formerly, Abortion is Murder, and, before that, skyp
(stop killing young
people)
April 1, 2014, Vol. 11
No. 23
PO Box 7424, Reading, PA 19603
Phone, 484-706-4375
Web, skyp1.blogspot.com
Circulation, 211
Editor, John Dunkle
“Contraception” is Murder, a weak,
pathetic response to baby murder, is sent out at least once a month. If the gestapo hasn’t jailed you yet for
defending the innocent realistically, you either have to tell me you want it or
go to the website. Emails are free but
snail-mail is free only for PFCs, two grand for others.
Because I believe we should examine every
legitimate means, including force, in our attempt to protect children from
being tortured to death, I want to hear
from people who’ve been forceful and from those who defend them. I’d also like
to hear from those who oppose the prolife use of force and call it violence.
Prisoners For Christ:
1. Evans, Paul
Ross 83230-180, FCI, PO Box 1500, El Reno, OK 73036
2. Griffin,
Michael 310249, BRCF, 5914 Jeff Atles Rd., Milton, FL 32583-00000
3. Grady,
Francis 11656-089, USP Coleman II,
P.O. Box 1034, Coleman, FL 33521
4. Holt,
Gregory 129616 Varner Supermax, PO
Box 600, Grady, AR 71644-0600
5. Kopp, James
11761-055, USP Canaan, P.O. Box 300,
Waymart, PA 18472
6. Roeder,
Scott 65192 PO Box 2, Lansing,
Kansas 66043
7. Rogers,
Bobby Joe 21292-017, USP
Beaumont, PO Box 26030, Beaumont, TX
77720
8. Rudolph,
Eric 18282-058 US Pen. Max, Box 8500, Florence CO 81226-8500
9. Shannon, Rachelle 59755-065, FCI
Waseca, Unit A, P.O. Box 1731, Waseca,
MN 56093
10. Waagner, Clayton Lee 17258-039, USP,
P.O. Box 1000, Lewisburg PA 17837
Recall
the argument Cal and I were having about baptism. I stopped posting it after the February 1
newsletter because we were drifting away from legal baby-killing, which is our
topic.
Cal
reminds me, though, that I’d promised to run this:
Cal,
The problem [Church teaching on Baptism] arises among
traditionalists because those who disobey the Church may be denied the
sacrament of holy communion.
me, Sure they
may, and many more than are should be.
If someone doesn’t believe what her Church teaches, she should find a
more compatible church, or she should not receive communion till she has gone
to confession.
Cal, Thus
traditionalists are gratified in that they need not wait in the communion line
with those who upset tradition.
me, If you put
it this way, you’d be closer to the truth: “Believing Catholics are gratified
in that they need not wait in the communion line with those who don’t believe.”
Cal, But then the traditionalists show their lack
of humility by conspiring to exclude the children of those who have disobeyed
the Church from receiving the sacraments as well.
me, Nope, that’s
not what happens. The Church especially welcomes the children of sinners,
and she especially welcomes sinners who have accepted the gift of a different
sacrament, confession.
Cal, In this case, the child in the Petri dish is being denied the
sacrament of baptism only because his or her parents disobeyed the Church and
conceived the child outside of proper moral boundaries.
me, Nonsense
Cal,
You would deny them the sacrament of Christian initiation even
though they are exposed to the grave risks of death!
me, No! We deny them because it is
impossible to give it to them!
Cal, We know Jesus was laid in a manger, which is an eating-trough for
animals. This is not the customary place for a child. In the same way, a Petri
dish is an eating-trough for bacteria and other microbes. It is not the
customary place for a child either. It is a sort of micro-manger. Yet the story
goes the three wise men came to venerate the child in the manger. His parents
had been shunned from the local inn . . . Thus the traditionalist who would not
offer gifts to the child in the micro-manger is not a wise man . . . . You have not shown from a theological or
canonical perspective why it is "impossible" to baptize the child in
a micro-manger. I have provided you the persuasive evidence to the contrary. If
above your head, you should run it by your son or monsignor friend.
me, I don’t do theology or canon law. I do
common sense. The sacrament requires that you immerse or pour water on
the recipient. You want to get rid of that requirement. Next you’ll
be wanting to get rid of the bread in communion or the vows in matrimony. Classic Protestant. Hey, I love
Protestants. (I keep my friend and
my son around till I need them.)
Cal, . . . The real reason why the Church throws
fire and brimstone at in vitro fertilization is to SCARE pious Catholics away
from asking the priest to bless and baptize the child in the Petri dish in the
first place.
me,
You keep confusing blessing with baptizing. You can bless that
child but you can’t baptize her. All seven sacraments (from Jesus) have
outward signs that must be observed. You also can’t break off a tiny
piece of the Host and mix it in the dish liquid so the child can receive communion,
or do seven thousand other silly things.
No, the real reason why the Church throws
fire and brimstone at in vitro fertilization is to SCARE pious Catholics, and
everyone else, from participating in a practice that results in killing people.
OK,
folks, this does end it. If you want to
read more, or contribute, you have to write Cal or me.
_________________________
--------------------------------------
Tobra’s
on the Rampage:
Blame it on my roots
I showed up in boots
And spoiled your black tie pro-life affair
My attire
Was not welcome there
And I did dare
To mention fags in high places
Bring devastating consequences that will dirty your pretty
pro-life amerikan faces
So I grabbed a glass of champaigne
Flipped you off and said prolife amerikans you
will stumble
You and your large house full of blessings will crumble
But you will never hear my complain
Cause I got friends in low places
Where the whiskey drowns and the beer chases my blues away
Think I will help the Prisoners of Christ
Cause they did something about baby killers and fags in
high places
PAUL ROSS EVANS here's a birthday bourbon toast
Happy birthday to you
May you find freedom and enjoy soon the sky so blue
_________________________
---------------------------------------
And
Frank’s Pissed Too:
MR John, Sir if you made it to your mail
box, and rerad BP-M0953 Form. Your
Publication been rejected off ther face of the earth. there no correspondence4 to me or any other
Federal inmate. Well only way is too here our case, you can write Regional
Director J. L. Norwood, 2nd Chgestnut St., Philadelphia, PA
19106. And I must seek Administrative
Remedy Program. That’s lot of bullshit,
we can fight the Federal Bureauy or however
Just put my name only in the Prisoner of Christ list. keep out the other state and federal inmates,
understand me. Sir John I am pro-life
110% + + + the federal bureau is the4 beast, house of Valley of death. however, and all kinds of criminal activity
you could dream. I put my self in
special house unit -2- stay clear of criminal activity. Can yu believe that Sir John.. Yes I must punish myself too be safe. I enjoy your article, Sir John. Well, do what you can at yur end, an I will
do the same, an God will reveal too al John so God Bless you sir, if I never
see ya inperson here on earth we can spend evelasting life in heaven OK!
So what was in this months publication? Save the return article for me sir John, I
don ‘t want -2- miss any of your publication stack them up for me sir untill we
get the federal bureau approve.
Well, save the children keep in your soul
God, woman, children first. Plust
stand up wen a woman enter a room John. put in your article that I am alive and
God Bless All. Francis Grady shingel
Dog. Godbless you John. peace
write soon sir John
______________________
---------------------------------
For the second time recently a local undercover agent distributes
writings she thinks disprove my contention that the use of force by pro-lifers may
be moral. I posted the first, written by
Joe Scheidler, last issue. This second
longer one is written by Monica Migliorino Miller. I divided it into two parts because in this
first part Miller actually supports the pro-force position:
Moral Principles on the Use of Force
The doctrinal and systematic theological
tradition of the Christian faith, since the time of the early Church Fathers
has much to offer in aiding a person to arrive at a correct understanding of
the issue before us. After all, we are not the first to wonder about these
things and probe into them. I have relied very heavily on this doctrinal
tradition primarily as it come to us in the form of the Christian Just War
Theory.
Many Christian theologians and moral thinkers
have wrestled with the very serious question of whether it is proper, and under
what conditions might it be morally licit to use force in defense of life (or
other goods such as property or land).
Going back to St. Augustine and St. Ambrose
the Just War Theory was forged. Shooting abortionists or destroying abortion
centers must be evaluated in light of the Christian principles that are our
heritage as the New People of God. After all, shooting abortionists and
destroying the mills, can be understood within the context of self-defense, or
defense of others.
Now, unless one is a principled pacifist,
such as Terry Sullivan, one can claim that, in principle and in practical
application, it is not always and everywhere wrong to employ force, including
deadly force in defense of life.
The
Christian religion is not categorically pacifist, though I think within the
tradition it is possible for individuals to have a vocation to pacifism.
Catholic priests, for instance, are pacifists. They cannot fight as soldiers in
an army.
St. Francis of Assisi (who was not a priest)
acted as a pacifist whenever his own bodily well-being was assaulted. Many will
argue that prior to Constantine the Church was pacifist, i.e., that Christians,
refused to serve in the army, and refused to defend themselves or others when
attacked. The historical record simply does not support this view. I can
provide a detailed examination of this point if others want it. The New
Testament itself does not condemn soldiers. For example in Lk. 3:14 some
soldiers presented themselves to John the Baptist for baptism and asked what
was required of them. John told them: "Don't bully anyone, Denounce no one
falsely. Be content with your pay." He does not tell them that their
profession is immoral which certainly required them to kill others if
necessary. In Lk. 7: 1-10 we have the story about the Roman centurion (this man
was not even a Jew). A centurion is a soldier with authority over 100 other
soldiers. His is a profession which involves the use of lethal force but Jesus,
instead of condemning him, or pointing out this ethical problem says instead
that in this soldier he has found a faith that exceeds that of the
Israelites! Obviously this Roman was a
righteous soldier. He cared about his servant and apparently did not abuse his
authority---but he was in a profession that used deadly force against others.
Now while soldiering is not condemned we must
take seriously Christ's teaching in the Beatitudes. Christ does teach that his
followers are to turn the other cheek and love their enemies. And so, in fact,
we are to do so. What Christ is teaching here is a whole moral attitude of
life. We are not to retaliate in vengeance when others hurt us and do unjust
things to us. We are to return love for evil. We are not to wish evil upon our
enemies. Love means to will the good for another---even those who do us harm.
The Christian faith does not teach that a
person cannot defend life against unjust attacks. And this is the whole point
in defense of life. If for example, my children were attacked, I can
justifiably shoot the attacker (if that is justifiable proportionate force to
repel him) to save my children. Believe it or not this does not mean I have
hated or directly willed that evil befall this attacker. In a true and real
sense his death is an indirect result of my primary object which is the defense
of my young ones. I do not seek his death directly. I seek the defense of my
children directly. I have not hated him. I have not willed evil against him. I
have sought legitimately to stop the attack---the result of which is the
possible the death of the attacker.
Christ admonished Peter "Those who live
by the sword will die by the sword." These words of our Lord are not a
condemnation of all use of force. Christ did not say these words to the
centurion, who apparently was not in an intrinsically evil profession. Again,
Christ is talking about a total moral attitude of life.
First, Peter resorted to force in a situation
that clearly called for self-sacrifice. How often had Christ preached to the
apostles that He was to offer up His life for the salvation of the world? Even
at this point Peter didn't get it. Peter was trying to subvert the providence
of God, the will of God for Christ at this moment. But the admonition of what’s condemned here is the living of a
violent way of life---even in defense of truth.
What's condemned is a person's placing his
trust solely in the use of force.
Miller
does a good job here showing that Christianity in general and Catholicism in
particular teach that the use of force may be moral. It makes me wonder if the agent can read
carefully the arguments she distributes.
She has actually petitioned the bishop to excommunicate me because I
publicize that very teaching. And then
she distributes this? It boggles the
mind.
However, because something may be moral doesn’t mean it is moral. And in the second part I’ll post next issue, Miller tries to prove
that in the present holocaust the use of force on our side is actually immoral.
________________
--------------------------
Linda Cantabene Epstein writes in The
Allentown, Pennsylvania, Morning
Call:
How nice it was to read the March 9
front-page article on the local women’s movement that was well timed for
Women's History Month.
As the day before, March 8, was International
Women’s Day, nearly 50 women and a few men gathered at our home for a tea party
for Planned Parenthood Pennsylvania Advocates. Amy Taylor, national political
director for Planned Parenthood Action Fund, generously attended and shared
some terrific insights into the political process. It would be comical, except
for the fact that some far-right-leaning groups seem to be funding our
government right back to the 1800s.
It does sometimes take the sacrifices of a
few to help many, but everyone can help prevent the closure of vital and
necessary health services clinics for women that provide basics like cancer
screening, family planning and birth control. Have your own tea party and keep
the conversation going and the funding for women's health in place. Support
your Planned Parenthood.
One of the area’s pro-lifers, Joyce Mazalewski,
responds:
Unplanned Parenthood Planned Parenthood is the largest
abortion provider in the nation. They
performed 333,964 abortions during 2011-2012 - almost 1.2 million over a 3 year
period. They only made 2,300 adoption
referrals and provided less than 30,000 prenatal services. "Contraceptive" drugs were given to
1.4 million victims inducing chemical abortions. Last year their income report exceeded $87
million and their net assets totaled more than $1.2 billion yet they received
$542 million from taxpayers! They do
not perform mammograms for cancer screening nor does any affiliate hold a
license necessary to do so. They have
failed to report rapes, criminal child sexual abuse, and sex trafficking. They have, however, accepted a donation from
a donor who indicated they wanted a black baby to be aborted.
They promote sexuality in children beginning
in their formative years in schools.
Sexually active children armed with contraception not taken or worn
properly, results in multiple abortions.
Cha ching.
Their foundress, Margaret Sanger, refers to
blacks as “human weeds, who never should have been born.” In keeping with her philosophy many
facilities are located in inner cities.
Any good that they may do is far outweighed by the damage they have done
to expectant mothers and their unborn children.
The Call
also posts an article about a long
time employee of the Allentown Women's Center seeking a donor for her fourth kidney
transplant. A prolifer responds:
ALL Life is Precious My heart and prayers go out to
Kathleen Romanick, the Bethlehem mom seeking her fourth kidney transplant. One would imagine that Kathleen must have
lived her life in such a way as to treasure and respect life.
Unfortunately, that is not the case. Kathleen has been an employee at a local
abortion mill for MANY years where she counsels expectant mothers seeking abortions. As the abortion mill is a ‘for profit’
business, one would speculate the counseling given would have leaned towards
procuring the abortion.
None of us is assured of a tomorrow and yet
in Kathleen's line of work the unborn are not assured of even a today. I do pray that Kathleen receives her kidney
transplant as ALL life is precious - those born – unborn – with disease and
without disease. We are all precious in
God’s eyes. I’m sure Kathleen
is a lovely woman who is precious to God and to her family and friends. I further pray that she embraces all life –
including the most vulnerable among us – the unborn.
________________
--------------------------
Two
hours before I learned officially of Freddy’s demise, this arrived from
Tobra. Genius.
REV FRED PHELPS is dead
Died peacefully in a hospice bed
FAGS BURN IN HELL
Will be how FRED is remembered well
Big Momma and her friends attend a raid
To ensure homosexuals don't get anymore Mississippi aid
The paper reports the buildings with the rainbow flags burned good
Unidentified sources brought the fire and wood
Two hours later this arrived from Michael. Eloquent.
Much could be said regarding the message of
Westboro and the reaction of both the world and the churches of God (of at
least their dissonant members). But, to be brief and timely in
eulogy, we shall restrain ourself.
Calling out the message that “God Hates Fags”
in the heat of the “gay liberation movement” when American Christian churches
are busily accommodating themselves to the latest trend in Godlessness is at
the least an act of independent thinking. More accurately, it is an act
of prophetic posturing. Jeremiah comes to
mind with his inarticulate
nudity and culinary bizarreness. Phelps and the Westboroans were low on
that totem pole of strange figures. A quick look at asceticism, celibacy, poverty, and all manner prophetic
witness regarding the fact of sin, judgment to come, and the salvation in
Messiah will yield some stories which seemed strange to the hearers.
Only one God? Only one wife? No
copulation with the women or men of one’s choice? No sex with
animals? Only one basic set of laws contained on a couple stone tablets?
Radical ideas when they first came into the
ears of pagans. And as we “Christians” have accommodated ourselves to the
neo-pagan trends of our apostate times, a prophetic voice as Westboro has
been, pricks our ears.
Brother Phelps, rest in peace. MBray
__________________
---------------------------
James
C. Kopp on the Animated Visual Arts:
GOD AND THE MOVIES
I believe God has found a way to get the
message of fighting against evil, of prolife and antiabortion across to us, in
the movies, and this message has been ignored.
Just as most people of a generation ago are
without excuse, those who saw Operation Rescue in the news everyday, and have
seen the big graphic signs, so also are the even more head-in-the-sand
Americans and other Modernists who go to the movies. One by one, a bit at a
time, the message about the fight against evil and the Christian message, and
the existence of diabolic forces was presented to them, and they ignored it.
Part of the problem is that there is an information overload and people don't
look at information as for enlightenment, but simply as distraction from their
own conscience. This could be a reason they don't get it, even when it’s put in
front of them.
But of course
there is more to it than that. They are willfully ignorant. They don't want to
know. They want to know the address of the mill and how much it costs, but they
don't want to know anything more than that.
Below are a few examples of messages God has
sent, I believe, even through secular films, and Modernists are without excuse,
even if they brag they've never been to church.
BEFORE THE PALL
The Ten
Commandments
The Robe
The Bells of St.
Mary’s
Pennies From
Heaven
It’s a
Wonderful Life
AFTER THE PALL
(... the Modern Pall started about July
27,1963. Just so you know. See Windswept House by M. Martin)
Fame -- a TV series spun off this movie about
a bunch of high school kids trying to break into show business. Dancers,
singers, comedians, actors. At one point a young woman has an alliance with
another student, and then, the movies depicts a heartrending scene in the mill
where she's pouring her heart out to the nurse there about how she really
doesn't want to abort, but she doesn't know what to do, etc. It is very clear
from the monologue that a tiny bit of compassion would have saved mother and
child. The camera turns to the nurse, a Nurse Ratchett dressed in old school
uniform.
"Will that be cash or charge?" the nurse says mechanically. What a
huge commentary against abortion and the fake compassion and money grubbing of
babykillers, and yet this entire scene was completely ignored by film critics.
The Exorcist -- ( Please see Hostage to the Devil by Malachi Martin.
Don't underestimate the veracity of this flick.) [tbc]
------------------------------------------
Quote of the Day: Republicans want to redefine rape,
Democrats want to redefine homicide.
Cal
----------------------------------------
For back issues of this newsletter go to
skyp1.blogspot.com
--------------------------------------------
To send money to the federal Prisoners, those
with eight digits after their names, make out a postal money order to the
Prisoner’s name and number. Then send it to Federal Bureau of Prisons, PO Box 474701, Des Moines, IA 50947-0001.
Ask the non-feds how they may receive money –
check, money order, etc. It varies by state.
---------------------------------------------
Receipt of this excellent missive
notwithstanding, if you wish to be excluded from such blessings in the future,
simply advise me.
No comments:
Post a Comment