Tuesday, February 19, 2013

"Contraception " is Murder, 10-13, March, 2013


 

formerly, Abortion is Murder, and, before that, skyp (stop the killing of young people)

 

March, 2013 Vol. 10   No. 13
PO Box 7424, Reading, PA 19603
Phone, 484-706-4375
Web, skyp1.blogspot.com
Circulation, 225
Editor, John Dunkle

 

  “Contraception”  is Murder, a weak, pathetic response to baby murder, is sent out at least once a month.  If the gestapo hasn’t jailed you yet for defending the innocent realistically, you either have to tell me you want it or go to the website.  Emails are free but snail-mail is free only for PFCs, a grand for others.

  Because I believe we should examine every legitimate means, including force, in our attempt to protect those being tortured to death, I want to hear from people who’ve been forceful and from those who defend them.  I’d also like to hear from those who oppose the prolife use of force and call it violence.

 

Prisoners  For  Christ: 

1.          Burt, John 209999, Raiford State Prison, P.O. Box 628, Lake Butler, FL 32054
2.         Evans, Paul Ross 83230-180,  FCI, PO Box 1500, El Reno, OK 73036
3.         Griffin, Michael 310249, BRCF, 5914 Jeff Atles Rd., Milton, FL 32583-00000
4.         Grady, Francis 131471, Wisconsin Resource Center, PO Box 220, Winnebago, WI 54985-0220
5.         Holt, Gregory 129616, Varber super Max, PO Box 600, Grady, AR 71644-0600
6.         Kopp, James 11761-055,  USP Canaan, 3057 Easton Tpk., Waymart, PA 18472
7.         Mower, Donny Eugene 65828-097, FCI ,PO Box 3997, San Pedro, CA 90731
8.         Roeder, Scott 65192  PO Box 2, Lansing, Kansas 66043
9.         Rogers, Bobby Joe,  Santa Rosa County Jail, PO Box 7129, Milton, FL 325872
10.       Rudolph, Eric 18282-058  US Pen. Max,  Box 8500, Florence  CO 81226-8500
11.       Shannon, Rachelle 59755-065, FCI Waseca, Unit A,  P.O. Box 1731, Waseca, MN 56093
12.       Waagner, Clayton Lee 17258-039, USP, P.O. Box 1000, Lewisburg  PA 17837   

  
A Thousand Bucks a Copy? 

Adam, Do you have a newsletter that you charge one thousand dollars for? Whew! I can only say, "Good Luck." A subscription to The New York Post doesn't even rise high enough toward a thousand dollars to talk about in comparison with yours. This is just for my personal nosiness, but, how many subscribers do you have? I wouldn't buy 200 of the flashiest, glossiest, highest class mags in the world for the price you are asking for yours. It would be miraculous if you have a singe subscriber. Sorry if this is too negative and I don't mean to hurt your feelings, but I do wish you good luck, at least.  

Me, Costs nothing for you, Adam, because I so much enjoy your repartee with the boys. Send me your address.  Oh yes, this month I have 225 subscribers.  How many of them pay me a thousand bucks to get hard copy?  Secret. 

Adam, Hey, I couldn't take something like that.  My repartee with the boys comes free, at no cost.  It's just something I do.  However, if you think you have a need to get your material in my hands, I'd be glad to look at it and see what you have.  My address is Adam Evenson, 1686 CR 415, Opp, AL 36467.  I'm rising pretty fast and not sure anything here will matter any longer to me in the near future, nor can I be sure that I will completely depart (not talking about death here), but of one thing I'm certain: cataclysmic changes are on the horizon.  I don't like to think about it much as I have two dogs I love and don't want to see them inconvenienced. This is the first time in my life I've not been optimistic about the near future and my old magic is not working so well right now, but I'm still what I am.  I enjoy a magical existence.  I don't see that ever changing.  Nature enveloped me in a cocoon a long time ago and the thing is crumbling away from me by sheer chemistry that's been cooking in me the whole time.  I am a butterfly about to catch wing and possibly fly away, into where only God knows.   

Me, That's fine, Adam, you get the whole thing via email anyway.  (I like your bio!)

  ____________________________
  ------------------------------------------ 

  The “repartee with the boys,” referred to above, is an on-going email battle between those who believe using force is legitimate in defending the victims in this holocaust, and those who do not.  I’ve gone through miles of copy, some of which appear in garish colors and caps (and wastes my time making it legible) because that’s my topic, as you can see from the two paragraphs above the PFCs.
  Many of the hundreds who get these emails ask out, like this guy -- Remove me from these discussions/diatribes and generally logorrehic cacophonies -- not just because many are hard to read but because they are filled with anger.  Has any other pro-justice movement ever included so many “my way or the highway” people?
  Here are some relevant sections of the exchanges.  For various reasons I’m using numbers rather than names for each response.  

#1.  1 While teaching and walking on Earth Jesus never used violence directly against another person to harm them physically.

2 After He ascended and the church was burgeoning, none of the apostles or disciples are recorded in the Bible as having used violence against the state or against individuals, except when a sword was lifted in defense of Jesus on the night He was betrayed. And, in that sole instance, Jesus rebuked him and told him to put away his sword.

3 Jesus has not yet returned to rule as the Lion-Judge. Yes, He certainly has this capacity and apparently we will judge with Him one day, too.

4 But, the fact that He will one day return to judge violently does not give us the right to use violence now.

5 The question is, what do we do while we are in this in-between period? Do we follow what the disciples did, or do we begin to rule temporally, now, much as Jesus, Himself, will one day do?

6 Do the same rules apply to us as those that applied to the early church? Or, have the rules either changed, or because there are more believers now than there once were, and because we hold more of the strings of temporal powers, are the same rules applied differently to us?

7 Personally, I will stick with the model of action given to us by the disciples and by Jesus, Himself, during His sojourn on Earth. There are Biblical reasons and Scriptural support to follow this path. Going the way of using violence before His return is speculative, at best.

8 An alternative action for us would be to act in such a manner that we incur the punishment of the state and of others for our righteous, non-violent behavior. This might include actions along the lines of MLK's marches.
 

#2.  But whoso shall offend one of these little ones which believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea.

  Matthew 18:6-7 shows that Jesus taught capital punishment. If murder by abortion is not offending "little ones" then what is it? Was Jesus joking or what?
 

#3.  No one argues here that capital punishment is wrong and according to Romans 13, it is the job of the government to do such, not a particular church, not believers.

  I was at the execution of Paul Hill, rejoicing that the State of Florida put that murderer to death.

  Tell me you do not believe in killing abortion doctors and or bombing clinics for Jesus Mr. Pro-Life?
 

#4.  If you don’t believe stopping a babykilling abortionist from murdering any more children with the use of force is wrong, only the wrong person is doing the stopping, may I ask, why do you care?

  If someone is doing the government’s job for them, for free, what’s the big deal? All of us do wrong things at times, you seem to be focused on someone doing the right thing, but the wrong person doing it. If this is so, why are you spending keystrokes refuting this.
 

#5.  For those of you who wonder why we are debating it is simple.   A number of people on this CC list believe it is the will of God to murder abortion doctors or bomb an abortion clinics.  I do not.  I hate abortion and have preached against such for over 30 year publicly.  I have stood outside countless abortion clinics and N.O.W. marches.  I also believe in the death penalty.  If the crime fits, the state should execute and Paul Hill was put to death on Sept. 3rd, 2003.

  This year some of these people will celebrate his 10th anniversary as they consider his action as hero stature.  Who knows, they might follow his example or try to get someone to do so.

  I say Paul Hill became what he preached against.

  Let me repeat what these oxy-morons believe: “The best way to oppose the murder of in utero children is to murder abortion doctors and their staffs.”

  And they think they are prolife?  Why stop at the doctors, why not shoot the nurses too, they work there.  Why stop with the nurses, why not the receptionists?  Why stop at the receptionists, why not the police that keep the peace?  Why stop at the police, why not the judges, they allowed abortion.   Why stoop at the judges, why not the politicians, they made it legal.  And the lawyers that have kept it legal, maybe they need a bullet. Why stop at the politicians and the lawyers, why not the voters that put hem in office.  They are to blame.  Why stop at the voters, why not every tax payer because they support these places of murder.  Why not just shoot everyone living, with their kind of thinking.
 

#6.  The strategy defined at http://www.aogusa.org is the current “best” strategy for those who are determined to abolish legalized abortion. That strategy became current among those who could learn from the past after other options like assassinating abortionists had failed to abolish legalized abortion. If you read the words there, you will not find one syllable devoted to assassinating abortionists. Instead you will find a strategy that specifically admits that assassinating abortionists has failed to abolish legalized abortion and therefore advocates a different strategy, one that has already, on two occasions, resolved the most fundamental arguments that have occurred in the past on the ground you are standing on--if in fact you feet touch the ground in the United States of America. So, no you don’t have it correct when you say that these people believe the “best way to oppose the murder of in utero children is to murder abortion doctors and their staffs.”
 

#7.   So  are you now telling me that God does not approve of killing these abortion doctors?  And if one does that he is a murderer, no?  We know that no unrepented murderer goes to heaven, right?   So they go to hellfire, right?  And if that is the case, then you now agree with me that Paul Hill is now burning in hellfire.
 

#8.  I am saying that God, in matters of law enforcement, as the Apostle Paul tells us, does what is expedient. If the weak vessels who serve Him cannot enforce His Law one way, He gives them a vision to enforce it another way.
  That is what has happened with the strategy Rev. Paul Hill embodied. God used Him to teach us what we were going to be required to do to abolish legalized abortion in this nation. He taught us this way: The Rev. Hill, in good faith, attempted to abolish legalized abortion by showing how assassinating abortionists can remove the means of abortion from this nation. The fact that his example turned out to teach us what does not work does not diminish Paul Hill as a teacher, but proves him in that role.
  But you understand none of that because you don’t know what the word murder means. Yet you presume to teach others. The fact that you insist on calling it murder when a person is engaged in enforcing God’s law against murder is your problem of logic and truth, a problem for which you will give extraordinary account to God one day.
 

#9.  Very well if you wish to call me the “weaker vessel.”  Because I do not wish to murder for Jesus, call me weak all day long. I am just sure that we do not have one person in the Gospel or the Book of Acts who killed a sinner for Jesus.
  You have double vision: so you believe Paul Hill was right but you will not do the same.  He obeyed God and so do you but you do not kill these doctors as Hill did and you have said he is a good example.  If his example was just, why don’t you follow?
  Bottom line was Hill failed and no one has followed.  Therefore, that makes his way the wrong way. And I do understand the difference between killing and murder.  Paul Hill murdered.  Those abortion doctors murdered.  The government that executed Hill, killed him as a result of his crime.  They did not murder him.  He was executed as a murderer, not for stealing a candy bar. 
 

#10.  You utterly missed the point. I did not call you a “weak vessel.”  Read below and you will see that I said, “I am saying that God, in matters of law enforcement, as the Apostle Paul tells us, does what is expedient. If the weak vessels who serve Him cannot enforce His Law one way, He gives them a vision to enforce it another way.”
  For you to have been the “weak vessel” I was referring to in that context, you would have had, at some point in your life, to have considered enforcing God’s Law, something of course which no one has or ever will be able to accuse you of doing.
  No, I was calling myself and all the other men who could not bear to follow in Paul Hill’s footsteps the weak vessels. We could not bear up under the trial that Paul Hill bore so bravely that no one in this generation on earth has ever glorified the Lord Jesus Christ more, or we would have followed in his footsteps and assassinated so many abortionists that no one would ply that trade in this nation. But we were weak, not you.
  But even though we are weak vessels, we are not confused vessels, as you are, about the difference between murder and justifiable homicide.
  The fact that you thought I was calling you the “weak vessel” proves that you really are effectively functionally illiterate. Therefore it is no wonder you can’t tell the difference between murder and justifiable homicide. Even when you read the Bible or the dictionary or the Encyclopedia or case law precedent, you just can’t understand what the words are referring to.
  The root case of your condition is you have no real relationship with Him who the Bible calls the Spirit of Truth. In the absence of that relationship it is no wonder that you can’t understand what you read, nor speak to things you know about.
  Hopefully this example of your inability to learn will teach others to learn to seek the Holy Ghost for themselves. 

#11.  I have a question for you. The other guy Paul Hill killed was not an abortionist at all but rather a private security guard.  Would the security guard’s death be murder? If not why not?  One more question -- what if a bystander would have been hit and died.  Would that be Murder from your point of view? 

#12.  To understand what I think you must first understand that I think war was declared against the least of God’s children when the Supreme Court (SCOTUS) decreed unborn babies were not eligible for the protection of law in the United States. I’ll say the same thing another way: When SCOTUS gave a license to couples to murder their babies if they didn’t want them to live, war is the word that best describes what occurred, and a war zone is the place where wars are going on.

  As I’m sure you know, in wartime and in a war zone words mean different things than the same words mean in peacetime. In other words, the conditions in which murder occurs is different in wartime and in a war zone.
  The abortion mill is the epicenter of the enemies’ killing machine in this war against the unborn babies. Abortionists and other employees of the killing mills are front line soldiers deployed to execute babies whose parents have been deceived by the Supreme Court into thinking they have a right to murder their own children if they don’t want them to live. The abortionist’s body guard Paul Hill killed was a soldier in the war against the unborn in the same way the abortionist was. Obviously the body guard had to be prevented from protecting the abortionist if the abortionist was to be executed. So that’s the way it is for the soldiers in this war against the unborn.
  Now here’s the answer to your question about bystanders.  Had Paul Hill killed a bystander not employed by the murder mill, that would have been collateral damage, the same way Bin Laden’s family that was killed with him were collateral casualties in the War on Terror. But Paul Hill was careful—a good soldier—and the damage he created was justified by the fact that the people he executed were on the verge of murdering babies.
  The fact that this war has been going on for 40 years in the USASA and I have to explain the war to you today shows you, and the vast majority of Christians, have been brainwashed to what reality looks like from the point of view of those babies being legally slaughtered in the USA, or from the point of view of their heavenly Father.
  Now it’s your turn. Tell me why war has not been raging in this nation for 40 years. Either that, or admit there are no civilians in this war since each and everyone of us have proven by our refusal to defend the babies that we are just as culpable in their slaughter as the abortionists who rend them limb from limb. 

#13.  Points well taken. But, I think you've gotta re-think your strategy, too, my friend. Though you are focused on outlawing abortion, you have not been able to do so in 40-ish years. 

  I’ll make two comments about these thirteen responses. 

  First, the best is paragraph 3 of #10 (although I would have substituted “baby killers” for “abortionists”).

  Second, #’s 3, 5, 7, and 9 are written by an infiltrator (a “rat”) or by infiltrators.  We have one of those here in the Allentown, Pa. area too and over the years I’ve learned how they talk.  They use words like “abortion doctors,” “abortion clinics, “and say things like “murder abortion doctors and their staffs.”  Killers and killers’ helpers talk like that, not prolifers.

  Moreover, their hatred for people like Hill and Griffin (and other jailed prolifers and those who defend them) is more intense than that of the open killers’ helpers.  I used to go daily to the abortion.ws blog.  Nothing scared those public pro-aborts except people who broke pro-death laws, and these hidden killers’ helpers are even more fearful, and fear leads to hatred.

  And hyperbole is their m├ętier (see paragraph 5 in #5).

  And we know these spies are around.  Look carefully at what’s happening to Angel Dillard in Wichita.

  ___________________________________
  -----------------------------------------------------

 

Obamacare and Racism
 

  I retired from the University of Maine on 15 January 2010 after 36 years in the Department of Earth Sciences and the Climate Change Institute (70% research, 30% teaching). Most of that time was spent in Boardman Hall, which housed both units. Next to Boardman hall was Little Hall, named to honor Clarence C. Little, President of the University of Maine in the 1920s. This was when American immigration laws were changed to favor immigrants from northwest Europe, a time when Eugenics was “legitimate” science. In 1927 the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 8-to-1 in Buck v. Bell that compulsory sterilization of the “unfit” by the State was constitutional because, in the words of Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., “Three generations of imbeciles are enough.” The Supreme Court has never overturned Buck v. Bell, and today sterilization is mandatory “health care” in The Affordable Care Act, called “Obamacare” informally, as are contraceptives and abortion-inducing drugs. All three have one goal: no babies are born. Fines of $100 per employee per day are levied against employers who refuse to comply. This will bankrupt virtually any company. What has this to do with racism? It targets the “unfit” in America, which is code for Black people. What have “they” ever contributed to civilization? And not just Black people. Read on.

  Clarence Little, a biologist specializing in genetic engineering, was a staunch advocate of these policies. Along with Irving Fisher and Madison Grant, Little chaired the Executive Committee of the Eugenics Committee of the United States of America, affiliated with the International Commission on Eugenics. The Advisory Council included Lothrop Stoddard, author of The Rising Tide Of Color Against White World Supremacy (1920). Grant advocated Nordic racial supremacy in The Passing Of The Great Race (1916), eight printings, and The Conquest Of A Continent (1933). Grant promoted laws favoring Nordic immigration to America. “Nordic” was synonymous with “Aryan” in Nazi racial ideology. Missoula, Montana, home of the University of Montana, boasts a bronze statue of Madison Grant.

  Nordics had their heyday during the Viking era. What did they contribute to civilization? Rape, pillage and plunder. They made positive contributions only after they became Christians. “Race” had nothing to do with it.

  Clarence Little was also President of The American Birth Control League, and was closely allied with Margaret Sanger, who founded the League in 1921. It became The Planned Parenthood Federation Of America in 1942. Sanger was one of eleven children of Irish immigrant parents. She thought her own genetic endowment was superior and warranted a large family. Only the “unfit” were targeted in her birth-control campaign, writing,  “More children from the fit, less from the unfit—that is the chief aim of birth control.” (Birth Control Review, May 1919.)

  Little agreed. In his opening address as Chairman of the sixth International Congress of Geneticists in 1932, Little stated, “I favor legislation that will restrict the production of these poor unhappy people. Treat them kindly, segregate them mercifully, but don’t let them be released to go out again into the world and breed more of their kind.” (Herald Tribune, Ithaca, New York, 25 August 1932.) These human beings were to be treated like livestock on a farm.

  Sanger agreed. Most of her six-part Plan For Peace anticipated The Third Reich. Quoting verbatim from parts 2, 4, 5, and 6 (Birth Control Review, April 1932.):

2. To apply a stern and rigid policy of sterilization and segregation to that grade of population whose progeny are already tainted, or whose inheritance is such that objectionable traits may be transmitted to offspring.

4. To give dysgenic groups in our population their choice of segregation or sterilizations.

5. To appropriate farmlands and homesteads for these segregated persons where they would be taught to work under competent instructors for the period of their entire lives.

6. To take an inventory of the secondary group such as illiterates, paupers, unemployables, criminals, prostitutes, dope-fiends; classify them in special departments under government medical protection, and segregate them on farms and open spaces as long as necessary for the strengthening and development of moral conduct.

  These “farms” and “homesteads” would be virtual concentration camps, as Sanger made clear in her seminal book, Pivot of Civilization (1922). Sanger thought 70 percent of Americans qualified for this Final Solution. Adolf Hitler took Sanger’s “Peace Plan” to its logical conclusion: Auschwitz.

  Deception is essential when a large part of any population is slated for genocide. The sign above the entrance to Auschwitz promised, “Work Will Make You Free” (Arbeit Macht Frei). “Planned Parenthood” sounds more benign than “Birth Control” and allows Federal and State governments to fund Planned Parenthood’s genocidal abortion activities at an annual rate of a half-billion dollars. Black people in America are targeted. Black people are thirteen percent of the American population, but nearly forty percent of Black babies are aborted. At Planned Parenthood it is over half, with Hispanic babies also being targeted. When Barack Obama was re-elected President and pledged to escalate taxpayer funding of abortion, PP announced all its affiliates will now provide abortions. Affiliates are concentrated in Black and Hispanic neighborhoods. Obama knows this.

  This calls to mind the “Negro Project” Margaret Sanger described in a letter dated 19 October 1919 to financial patron Clarence Gamble of the Proctor and Gamble fortune: “The most successful educational approach to the Negro is through a religious appeal. We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellions members.” Such ministers were readily available. To name three, Jesse Jackson, Ralph Abernathy, and Jeremiah Wright, pastor to Barack Obama for two decades. How much better to have a “Negro” President of the United States beating the extermination drum, calling it “health care” not just in America, but in Black Africa too. A primary goal of the Obama Presidency has been to work with “population control” enthusiasts in the U.S., at the U.N., and elsewhere to target Black babies for abortion in African countries. In Kenya, Obama’s African “homeland”, this required a referendum that approved a new national Constitution, after a massive propaganda campaign funded by American taxpayers.

  Ironies abound. It is commonly accepted that 6 million Jews were murdered at Auschwitz, after a Nazi propaganda campaign branded them as sub-human untermenschen who polluted the “Aryan” race. The first Jewish woman on the U.S. Supreme Court, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, referring to the 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling that the U.S. Constitution allowed killing the entire next generation of Americans by abortion, stated in a New York Times interview on 7 July 2009, “Frankly, I had thought at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about overpopulation growth and particularly growth in populations we don’t want to have too many of.” What “populations”? Black Africans! That’s why the Federal Government heavily subsidizes Planned Parenthood. In 2012, PP surpassed 6 million abortions since Roe, with Black (and now Hispanic) babies targeted  (ALL News, Oct. – Nov. 2012, newsletter of American Life League). Cannot Justice Ginsburg see the irony?

  How deeply imbedded is this Institutionalized Racism? The 1902 Encyclopedia Britannica, published at the zenith of British imperialism, under the “Negro” entry, listed 14 characteristics that separated them from White people. Here are eight, in the order listed by Britannica. All of them put “Negroes” closer to apes and all are generally false:

1. The abnormal length of the arm which in the erect position sometimes reaches the kneepan.

2. Prognathism, or projection of the jaw.

3. Weight of the brain, as indicating cranial capacity, 35 ounces (highest gorilla, 20, average European 45).

5. Short flat snub nose deeply depressed at the base or frontal suture, broad at extremity, with dilated nostrils and concave ridge.

8. Exceedingly thick cranium enabling the Negro to butt with the head and resist blows which would inevitably break any European’s skull.

9. Correspondingly weak lower limbs terminating in a broad flat foot with low instep, divergent and somewhat prehensile great toe.

13. Frame of medium height, thrown somewhat out of the perpendicular by the shape of the pelvis, the spine, and backward projection of the head, and the whole anatomical structure.

14. The cranial sutures, which close much earlier in the Negro than in other races. To this premature ossification of the skull, preventing all further development of the brain, many pathologists have attributed the inherent mental inferiority of blacks, an inferiority which is even more marked than physical differences.

  This “learned” description of Black people recalls the 19th century caricatures of Irish immigrants drawn by cartoonist Thomas Nast when they were seen as a threat to America’s “Anglo-Saxon” stock. Nast depicted the Irish as apes. But Nast was a cartoonist. This was The Encyclopedia Britannica.

  Britannica didn’t stop there: “On his moral status, even when removed from the old associations and brought directly under more favorable influences, a lurid light is cast by the report of the Rev. Dr. Tucker at the American Church Congress for 1883 on the present condition of the black communities in the Southern States: ‘I know of whole neighborhoods where there is not one single Negro couple, whether legally married or not, who are faithful to each other beyond five weeks. In the midst of a prayer meeting I have known Negroes to steal from each other, and on the way home they will rob any hen-roost that lies conveniently at hand.’” Britannica’s “authority” is a White red-neck racist? Just asking.

  Well, isn’t Planned Parenthood promoting in public schools this very same “inclusive” and “multicultural” sexual activity and more, sodomy and seduction of children for example, all with generous government support and no parental notification?

  What is the source of Institutional Racism? We need look no further than 1859 when Charles Darwin published The Origin of Species By Means of Natural Selection or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. That’s the complete title. The “Favoured Races” part is conveniently left out today, but the 1902 Britannica took note. Darwin’s enduring legacy to mankind has been his notion that “science” shows we came from worms and our destiny is to be eaten by worms. End of story. Among the Intelligentsia, it has replaced the Biblical view that we were created by the Creator of the Universe, in His image and likeness, with the intention we would spend eternity with Him.  Quite a distinction. Only “intellectuals” would prefer the former to the latter explanation. It allows them to pretend they are “gods” themselves, since no higher authority is allowed. Always eager to be liberated by their betters, “elites” in the academy, the media, law, entertainment, government, and politics were quick to join in lockstep. So it remains today.

  Why invest so much time, money, and energy in producing worm food? This mindset has now infected ordinary people in “developed” nations. One-child sex-selection abortions are rampant in India and China. Europeans shun bearing and raising children. Latin America and Islam are going this route. Only Black Africa is holding out. Since producing “worm food” is unappealing, Survival Of The Fittest requires castrating and spaying those who still treasure children. Most of them live in Africa and in countries formerly engaged in the African slave trade, America in particular. All the manufactured hysteria over a phony “population bomb” now linked to “catastrophic man-caused global warming” is a smokescreen to hide the true agenda of drastically reducing this “breeding” population. Propaganda, coercion, and economic imperialism are the tools. “The World” needs African economic resources more than it needs Africans, who only produce children. This was the goal of National Security Study Memorandum 200, drafted by Henry Kissinger for Richard Nixon and it remains a cornerstone of U.S. foreign policy today.

  Obamacare is designed to keep children from being born and targets elderly and handicapped people with Death Panels, not to mention Sanger’s “illiterates, paupers, unemployables, criminals, prostitutes, and dope-fiends.” They are Obama’s “unfit” who keep the rest of us from enjoying la dolce vita. That’s something like Margaret Sanger’s 70 percent of us, much more than the 13 percent who are Black. Obamacare could have been defeated three times: in Congress, in the Supreme Court, and in the 2012 general election. It wasn’t. So what “race” is being targeted for extermination? Why the human race, of course. And who has targeted the human race? Why we have, of course. As Dostoevsky wrote in The Brothers Karamazov, “If there is no God, everything is permissible.” Darwin Uber Alles!

  If the real target of the Darwinists is the whole human race, why are Black people singled out so prominently? Because Darwinists think Black people really are inferior to White people and closer to apes. Darwinists will never state this openly, that’s Politically Incorrect, but Darwinian ideology demands they believe this. So they use Black people as surrogates who can get targeted preferentially—at first. That is, until everyone else gets accustomed to the idea of terminating “the unfit” in concentration camps, initially meaning Black people. Once that is accepted, the “unfit” categories can be expanded to include everyone on Margaret Sanger’s list—and more.  It’s a list that expands to include everyone who holds “unfit” views. Ultimately the human race.

  Who could possibly seek this goal? Lucifer-become-Satan. In his pride he thought Heaven was his “entitlement” because he was the equal of God (Isaiah 14:11-15). When his pride entitled him to Hell instead, by his own choice, “Better to reign in Hell than serve in Heaven” (Paradise Lost, Book 1, line 263), and God had opened Heaven to mankind through Jesus Christ, Satan’s rage against us was all-consuming.

  Obamacare is presented to us as an “entitlement” by Barack Obama, but in reality it is a death-sentence for future generations (abortion) and for the most vulnerable of our generation (Death Panels). Why? Is it because, wittingly or not, Barack Obama has sold his soul to Satan? If he has, Obama, like Lucifer, worships only himself, but he doesn’t like himself. He has no close friends, not even himself. His associates are expendable—after he has gotten what he wants from them. What does he want? Power. Absolute Power to resist his deepest fear.

  My personal view is Obama, half White and half Black, hates us all because he hates himself, a child of miscegenation with no heritage of his own, abandoned first by his own father, then by his mother. Ultimately, he hates God, the Father of our common humanity who created us to spend eternity with Him, the fountain of Life, because he loves us. Why else has Obama embraced Death so tightly? This is why he reveres Darwin’s view of our—and his—destiny. Worm food. Notice that Isaiah 14:11-15 states those in Hell will be covered with worms. Worm food. Darwin tells us we are all just worm food. And so we are. Those embracing Lucifer have given their soul to one who hates us, and not to Jesus Christ who loves us. At the deepest level of his being, Obama has chosen Hell. Fearing being alone, he wants to take us with him, but not out of love. He can’t love. We have re-elected as president a sociopath who is insane. A madman occupies the White House.                               Terry Hughes

  _______________________________
  ----------------------------------------------- 

To send money to the federal Prisoners, those with eight digits after their names, make out a postal money order to the Prisoner’s name and number. Then send it to Des Moines, Iowa 50947-0001.
  Ask the non-feds how they may receive money – check, money order, etc. It varies by state.
  ___________________________________
  -----------------------------------------------------
  Receipt of this excellent missive notwithstanding, if you wish to be excluded from such blessings in the future, simply advise me.