Formerly, Abortion is Murder, and, before that, skyp (stop the killing of young people)
December, 2012, Vol. 10 No. 8
PO Box 7424, Reading, PA 19603
Phone, 484-706-4375
Web, skyp1.blogspot.com
Circulation, 216
“Contraception” is Murder, a
weak, pathetic response to baby murder, is sent out at least once a month. If the gestapo hasn’t jailed you for
defending the innocent realistically, you either have to tell me you want it or
go to the website. Emails are free but
snail-mail is free only for PFCs, $900 for others.
Because
I believe we should examine every legitimate means, including force, in our
attempt to protect those being tortured to death, I want to hear from people
who’ve been forceful and from those who defend them. I’d also like to hear from those who oppose
the prolife use of force and call it violence.
Prisoners For Christ:
1. Evans, Paul Ross 83230-180,
USP McCreary, P.O. Box 3000, Pine Knot,
KY 42635
2. Griffin, Michael 310249,
5914 Jeff Ates Rd., Milton, FL 32583-0000
3.
Holt,
Gregory 129616, Varner Super Max, P. O. Box 600, Grady AR 71644-0600
4. Knight,
Peter James, P.O. Box 376, Laverton,
Victoria, Australia
5. Kopp, James
11761-055, USP Canaan, P.O. Box 300, 3057 Easton Tpk., Waymart, PA 18472
6. Lang, Ralph, Inmate, Dane
County Jail, 115 West Doty Street, Madison, WI 53703
7. Mower,
Donny Eugene 65828-097, FCI Terminal Island, PO Box 3007, San Pedro,
CA 90731
8. Roeder, Scott P. 65192, PO Box 2, Lansing Kansas 66043
9. Rogers,
Bobby Joe, Santa Rosa County Jail, P.O.
Box 7129, Milton FL 32572
10. Rudolph, Eric 18282-058 US Pen. Max,
Box 8500, Florence CO 81226-8500
11. Shannon, Rachelle 59755-065, FCI
Waseca, Unit A, P.O. Box 1731, Waseca, MN 56093 3/31
12.
Waagner,
Clayton Lee 17258-039, United States Penitentiary, P.O. Box 1000,
Lewisburg PA 17837
________________________________________________
________________________________________________-
It's easy to scoff at miracles, but
another thing I liked about Christ was that he never performed magic-trick
miracles; he didn't pull rabbits out of a hat, or produce gold ingots. He
performed the miracle of the loaves and the fishes; he made the blind see, the
lame walk, the deaf hear. He performed miracles to bring people alive; he
operated on a higher level of reality in order to bring love into the world.
He didn't go off and sit
in a cave and grant folks an audience one by one, like some wise old shaman, either;
he mingled. He ate and drank with people; he touched them, human flesh to human
flesh: demoniacs, lepers. And when he did heal, he never held the people up as
sideshow freaks or floor models to show how great he was...
The small, hidden,
anonymous God I found in the Gospels appealed to me deeply. It was the God I'd
found in sobriety, who worked through other people, who had a sense of humor,
who held me accountable and forgave me at the same time. Who didn't force or
judge, just invited me to do a little better, then put the challenges in my
path to teach me how. Christ subverted all worldly systems - political,
familial, financial: not for the sake of being subversive, but because acting
with utter integrity is automatically subversive.
He was left of the
furthest left and right of the furthest right, both radically liberal and
radically conservative. In one breath he could say, "Honor your father and
your mother" (Mk 7:10) and in another, "let the dead bury their own
dead" (Lk 9:60).
_________________________________
------------------------------------------
Dear John, The U.S. Supreme
Court in Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973) made it very, very clear, at p. 162,
that if you want to invoke the equal protection of the laws for children during
gestation, then the proper formula is: The unborn shall be recognized in the
law as persons in the whole sense.
This is where the Court concludes in Roe, at p. 162, that the reason it can allow abortion without considering the children's rights is this: "In short, the unborn have never been recognized in the law as persons in the whole sense."
So the proper legal formula for an amendment to the U.S. Constitution would read:
Amendment XXVIII
Section 1. The unborn shall be recognized in the law as persons in the whole sense.
Section 2. Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.
That is the proper constitutional challenge to Roe v. Wade. State amendments would be similar, except they would refer to their state legislatures for enforcement, rather than to the U.S. Congress.
In addition to clarifying the proper formula for personhood recognition, the Court also made it very, very clear, at pp. 157-158 in Roe, in footnote 54, it will not take any wooden nickels as substitutes for recognition in the whole sense.
This is where the Court concludes in Roe, at p. 162, that the reason it can allow abortion without considering the children's rights is this: "In short, the unborn have never been recognized in the law as persons in the whole sense."
So the proper legal formula for an amendment to the U.S. Constitution would read:
Amendment XXVIII
Section 1. The unborn shall be recognized in the law as persons in the whole sense.
Section 2. Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.
That is the proper constitutional challenge to Roe v. Wade. State amendments would be similar, except they would refer to their state legislatures for enforcement, rather than to the U.S. Congress.
In addition to clarifying the proper formula for personhood recognition, the Court also made it very, very clear, at pp. 157-158 in Roe, in footnote 54, it will not take any wooden nickels as substitutes for recognition in the whole sense.
What happened in Roe is that Texas, rather
than defending children in the whole sense, thought it could play the Court
off, by instead only offering a wooden nickel of recognition as a substitute.
As the Court tattles at pp. 157-158 in Roe, in footnote 54, Texas "faces a dilemma," rather than defending its unborn children in the whole sense:
"When Texas urges that a fetus is entitled to Fourteenth Amendment protection as a person, it faces a dilemma. Neither in Texas nor in any other State are all abortions prohibited. Despite broad proscription, an exception always exists."
As the Court tattles at pp. 157-158 in Roe, in footnote 54, Texas "faces a dilemma," rather than defending its unborn children in the whole sense:
"When Texas urges that a fetus is entitled to Fourteenth Amendment protection as a person, it faces a dilemma. Neither in Texas nor in any other State are all abortions prohibited. Despite broad proscription, an exception always exists."
The Fourteenth Amendment is code for being
entitled to the equal protection of the laws, rather than having no rights
anyone is bound to respect. Back during Slavery, the Court ruled in a case
called Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857), that African-Americans are
"beings so far inferior" that they have no rights we are literally
"bound" to respect (see p. 407).
But the
Fourteenth Amendment changed that. The same proposition is at stake today for
the unborn.
But today states still face a "dilemma" when it comes to full recognition. Those who call themselves "personhood" advocates get out the pen and draw a wiggly line to show what rights they would respect and where they think it would be going too far. They are not ready to embrace the fundamental proposition of the Fourteenth Amendment by recognizing the unborn in the law as persons in the "whole" sense.
But today states still face a "dilemma" when it comes to full recognition. Those who call themselves "personhood" advocates get out the pen and draw a wiggly line to show what rights they would respect and where they think it would be going too far. They are not ready to embrace the fundamental proposition of the Fourteenth Amendment by recognizing the unborn in the law as persons in the "whole" sense.
As
echoed by the Court in Roe, at pp. 157-158, footnote 54, "Despite broad
proscription" in these so called personhood amendments, "an exception
always exists."
Since the Court already made it clear it would not accept wooden nickels, you have to wonder who these people think they are fooling by proposing so called personhood amendments that reflect the exceptions their dilemmas cause them to add. But they do fool lots of people, including even themselves, and they rally their cause, and they have made an ongoing racket out of it.
It is hard to find anyone who will stand up for the proposition that the unborn have rights that we are literally bound to respect, rather than having rights merely in the figurative sense of as if it were so, with the line being drawn according to convenience.
As Justice John Paul Stevens tattles at p. 913 in Planned Parenthood v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992), which upheld Roe 20 years later, 505 U.S. 833 (1992):
"In short, the unborn have never been recognized in the law as persons in the whole sense.” [Citing Roe] Id., at 162. Accordingly, an abortion is not "the termination of life entitled to Fourteenth Amendment protection." Id., at 159.
Since the Court already made it clear it would not accept wooden nickels, you have to wonder who these people think they are fooling by proposing so called personhood amendments that reflect the exceptions their dilemmas cause them to add. But they do fool lots of people, including even themselves, and they rally their cause, and they have made an ongoing racket out of it.
It is hard to find anyone who will stand up for the proposition that the unborn have rights that we are literally bound to respect, rather than having rights merely in the figurative sense of as if it were so, with the line being drawn according to convenience.
As Justice John Paul Stevens tattles at p. 913 in Planned Parenthood v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992), which upheld Roe 20 years later, 505 U.S. 833 (1992):
"In short, the unborn have never been recognized in the law as persons in the whole sense.” [Citing Roe] Id., at 162. Accordingly, an abortion is not "the termination of life entitled to Fourteenth Amendment protection." Id., at 159.
From this holding, there was no dissent, see
id., at 173; indeed, no Member of the Court has ever questioned this fundamental
proposition."
In other words, each of the so called "pro-life" Members of the Court "faces a dilemma" not unlike that of Texas in Roe v. Wade.
Though there was dissent in Roe over the states' rights, there was "no dissent" over the denial of the children's rights under the Fourteenth Amendment. Meaning, no Member of the Court even questioned the fundamental proposition of whether children are beings so far inferior that they have no rights we are literally bound to respect; instead, their only question was in what ways states should have say over abortion.
Justice Blackmun, who wrote Roe for the Court, joined Justice Stevens in tattling on the so called "pro-life" justices, saying at p. 932 in Casey:
"No Member of this Court - nor for that matter, the Solicitor General, Tr. of Oral Arg. 42 - has ever questioned our holding in Roe that an abortion is not the termination of life entitled to Fourteenth Amendment protection." 410 U.S., at 159.
In other words, each of the so called "pro-life" Members of the Court "faces a dilemma" not unlike that of Texas in Roe v. Wade.
Though there was dissent in Roe over the states' rights, there was "no dissent" over the denial of the children's rights under the Fourteenth Amendment. Meaning, no Member of the Court even questioned the fundamental proposition of whether children are beings so far inferior that they have no rights we are literally bound to respect; instead, their only question was in what ways states should have say over abortion.
Justice Blackmun, who wrote Roe for the Court, joined Justice Stevens in tattling on the so called "pro-life" justices, saying at p. 932 in Casey:
"No Member of this Court - nor for that matter, the Solicitor General, Tr. of Oral Arg. 42 - has ever questioned our holding in Roe that an abortion is not the termination of life entitled to Fourteenth Amendment protection." 410 U.S., at 159.
The Solicitor General was Kenneth Starr of
the Republican Administration. That is the lawyer who represents the Government
before the Supreme Court.
In other words, even 20 years after Roe, no one before the Court had ever questioned the fundamental proposition of the children's rights.
From this analysis it should be clear that the average American has a mistaken view of purported efforts to protect the unborn, at both the state and national levels.
In other words, even 20 years after Roe, no one before the Court had ever questioned the fundamental proposition of the children's rights.
From this analysis it should be clear that the average American has a mistaken view of purported efforts to protect the unborn, at both the state and national levels.
Sincerely, Cal /EC/
Mr. Eurica Califorrniaa
_______________________
--------------------------------------
Man gets 10
years for firebombing abortion clinic
A homeless man was sentenced to 10 years in federal prison on Thursday for the New Year's Day firebombing of a violence-plagued abortion clinic in the Florida Panhandle.
Bobby Joe Rogers, 41, pleaded guilty in July to charges of arson and
damaging a reproductive health facility.
The fire gutted Pensacola's American Family Planning Clinic. The
building's charred shell has since been razed.
Rogers, a transient with a lengthy criminal history, told detectives he
had been living in a parking lot near the clinic and decided to set the fire
because he was upset that abortions were performed there.
Rogers had attended some of the near-daily protests that had previously
taken place outside of the clinic and said he believed in the anti-abortion
cause. He had no record of social or political activism before the firebombing.
The building was the site of previous anti-abortion violence, including
a double-murder in 1994 when an anti-abortion activist killed a doctor and the
doctor's security escort. The building was bombed in 1984.
U.S. District Judge M. Casey Rodgers said she handed Rogers a lengthy
sentence because of his long history of drug and alcohol-related arrests and other
criminal problems in numerous states.
U.S. Attorney Pamela C. Marsh said the sentence shows that the
government takes abortion-related violence seriously: "We will continue to enforce
laws protect all the rights guaranteed our citizens under the United States
Constitution and federal laws, including access to reproductive healthcare
clinics in north Florida.”
BUTTERCUP SALUTES
dandydon: folks tonight we wish to salute a fine
upstanding gentleman who was kind enough to torch a fatal fetal female facility
in floRIDa
kathielee: that's
right yall, MR. BOBBY JOE ROGERS lit up that floRIDa facility to ring in the
new year
howardcosell: so let
not old acquaintances be forgot
let's not fail to send mr. rogers our congrats as well as some
dough ray me
frankgifford: you will
find more about MR. ROGERS when you scroll down &also by reading about him
& other POC's on REV SPITZ Army of God website
buttercup; MR. BOBBY JOE ROGERS WE SALUTE YOU
SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAALLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUTTTTTTTTTEEEE
Ain’t Tobra fine, not to mention Bobby Joe.
________________________________
------------------------------------------------------
Here’s a peaceful, prayerful way to oppose
child killing:
"I didn't get there early enough to see the customers arriving, but I was there when they were exiting,"
she said. "Every woman was crying. Every one. I was not prepared for that. And this is 'women's rights'?"
She
had another profoundly sad realization as well:
"Every woman was brought in by a man. The parking lot was full of men pacing, smoking or sitting in their cars. For every abortion, there is a man -- a father presiding over the death of his child."
She recalled the TV shows of years ago, where nervous fathers paced in hospital waiting rooms, reacting with joy when the nurse came in to say, "It's a girl!" or "It's a boy!"
"What a contrast to this scene," she said, "where all these men were waiting to hear one thing: 'It's over,'
which is followed by taking a weeping woman home.”
God have mercy."
"Every woman was brought in by a man. The parking lot was full of men pacing, smoking or sitting in their cars. For every abortion, there is a man -- a father presiding over the death of his child."
She recalled the TV shows of years ago, where nervous fathers paced in hospital waiting rooms, reacting with joy when the nurse came in to say, "It's a girl!" or "It's a boy!"
"What a contrast to this scene," she said, "where all these men were waiting to hear one thing: 'It's over,'
which is followed by taking a weeping woman home.”
God have mercy."
And here’s a more forceful way:
If
one does violence to the blood of another he will be a fugitive until death; let
no one support him. ~
Proverbs 28:17
I have been offering abortion-bound women my
personal help through pregnancy for almost twenty years now. Half of those
women are what is popularly known as “post-abortive.”
Friends, I can no longer tolerate the
unbiblical and therefore fraudulent terminology for mothers who kill their
living infants.
I believe that I have been patient, using
scriptures to try to clarify the reality of total human depravity. Jesus makes
it crystal clear that "murder
comes out of the heart". (Matthew 15:19;Mark 7:21)
Perhaps
it was Ann and her precious baby. They may have become my “last straw.” Let me explain:
Ann murdered her 18 week baby by procuring
the services of a baby-killing abortionist. She went to the baby-killer. He
didn't come to her. Ann carried her baby into the abortuary two days in a row
to submit to the violent abuse of her son or daughter. She paid $1130 to have her
dismembered, piece by piece, while she was still alive, this morning.
I want to tell you all of the ways in which
this young mommy was given the opportunity to love her baby.
Ann:
*
was counseled at a local pregnancy
center
*
was informed about fetal
development
*
saw her baby on ultrasound three times*
was given “options counseling”'
*
was taken through a problem-solving process
*
was provided with wonderful ways to overcome the obstacles of her pregnancy*
received my personal offer of help on Day 1
of her killing process
was given a Tiny Hands book
was given detailed information and a brochure
about adoption
was told that God knew her baby before He
formed her in the womb (Jer 1:5)
was told her baby was a gift from God (Ps
127:3)
was given God's commandments about sexual
immorality & murder
was told that abortion is the pre-meditated
sin of murder for which the guilty will be cast into the lake of fire *
was offered help by a gentle couple outside
the killing place on Day 2 of her killing process
Please, do not comment on this note with
reasons why you think women who kill their babies by abortion are “victims.” I don't want to
hear it. Ever. Again. I am sick to death of it and I am not going to put up
with the lies. Any. More.
THE.
BABIES. ARE. THE. ONLY. VICTIMS. OF. ABORTION.
Women have played the “victim” while they are
pregnant, when they are
going to kill their babies
and then, when they want more sympathy later,
they play the “victim” card as a “post-abortive woman.” I will not be a party to it. So, I fear that
even though I will lose friends, I am not willing to go along with the diabolical
lie that makes mothers pity themselves and become objects of pity from others while four
thousand innocent babies are being carried by mothers through the doors of
abortuaries as I type this message.
I am one of the people who are there,
pleading for the lives of the children and reaching out to the girls and women
who are walking into the building. No one can ever accuse me of being uncaring.
I have cared & prayed & wept & fasted & pleaded & wept
& wept & wept till my heart is broken. NO ONE CAN DO A SURGICAL
PROCEDURE ON A MOTHER WHO IS NOT IN THE KILLING PLACE. NO ONE CAN DO A SURGICAL
PROCEDURE, OR INDUCE LABOR, OR PRESCRIBE A SET OF KILLING PILLS TO A MOTHER WHO
IS NOT THERE. NO ONE CAN MURDER A BABY BY D & E, D & C, PROSTAGLANDIN
(DELIVERY) ABORTION WITHOUT HER WRITTEN, SIGNED, EXPRESS CONSENT.
Jesus said: "I came not to call the righteous, but sinners to
repentance." (Luke 5:32;Matthew 9:13;Mark 2:17) The Lord
Christ came to die for sinners who KNOW THEY ARE SINNERS. Not for fornicators and
murderers who profess to be “victims.”
When
we act as if people who fornicate and murder do it out of “ignorance,” we undermine
the whole gospel.
I am
sure I will have to hear this rot for the rest of my life, but not here. This
is going to be an abortion no-spin zone. The poor little innocent babies who
have suffered and are suffering. The dear children who have perished and are
perishing. And in the overwhelming majority of the cases their violent sufferings
and murders were at the hands of their sexually immoral mothers (and all who were co-conspirators to
their murders).
Those dead human beings deserve to be treated
as if they were more than a “choice”
or a “decision”
or even a “mistake”
or “regret.” I
will not participate in nor tolerate the lie of victimhood of aborting and
post-abortive mothers.
People like us, who are fornicators and
murderers, don't need post-fornication
counseling or post-abortion
support, we need to repent in godly sorrow over our sin. We need to
be born-again. We need a new heart!
When post-abortive women refer to themselves
as victims or as someone who "lost"
a child, it upsets me and it speaks to what I call a "false justice"
movement. This is so popular, especially among my generation and younger. It is
people centered and self focused, and is very deceiving because it looks as
though we are helping these women. However, the only real justice comes from
repentance, application of the true Gospel and a focus on JESUS and the
depravity of our own hearts.
I think of the many girls and women we met at
the killing place who turned away from murdering their babies. They have made
the sacrifices of time and treasure, working day and night to raise and to
provide for their children. They are reaping what they have sown in their sin,
but they are taking responsibility for having sex. Many are doing without
things they want to give their babies what they need. It is the ultimate irony
that the women who murder their babies and don't have to endure all of the
grueling days and nights of serving their children and paying to raise them
become the ones with the status of “victim.”
My friend John Barros has been
pleading with mothers who are laboring & delivering their live babies into
the toilet for two straight days. One of the mommies is 24 weeks pregnant! How
much do you want to bet that some years from now these women will tell their
teary-eyed stories about how they were a 'victim'
of abortion & felt they 'didn't
have any other choice'. They will conveniently forget that God sent
real people to intervene & love them & their babies through pregnancy.
But they WOULD NOT. They are without excuse. Now or on the Day of judgment. May
they repent & cry out to Jesus, before it's too late.
Except for extremely rare situations of very,
very young girls who are being used & abused by rapists, teens &
women who murder their babies by abortion are not innocent 'victims', they are guilty perpetrators.
I want to surround myself with humble
Christians who KNOW they are sinners. I have no interest in trying to tiptoe
through the pew-lips with professing Christians who say they are 'victims' who need some
sort of extra-biblical 'healing' .
I am looking for true fellowship with people who know they are hell-deserving
wretches (like me)
& who are unashamed of Jesus & His Word. I dare not trust the sweetest
frames who promote unbiblical, humanistic, woman-centered hogwash.
I am convinced that the problem stems from
people honestly believing that human beings are basically good. They think that
if a girl or woman 'knew better,'
she
wouldn't sin. Say what?
Where did the doctrine of original sin go?
This note is not a personal attack against
anyone in particular. It was meant to take a stand for what is biblical &
true & to take a stand against what is a humanistic/therapeutic
lie. People (all people)
sin because they have a sin nature. The evil that they think, say & do comes
out of their own wicked stony heart. They are responsible for every way in
which they transgress the Law of God in thought, word & deed. God holds
them responsible & His Word says they will reap what they sow, in this life
& in the next if they are never born-again. Try to find the word 'victim' in the Bible. I
challenge you.
God is particularly tenderly disposed towards
orphans. Because they are like the invisible ones. The underdogs. They are easy
to dismiss because they have no power. No one has to 'impress' or 'please' them to gain
favor. It's sad. Really sad, because these innocent children are the real 'victims' in ruthless
societies.
You will be hard-pressed to find any
reference of murderers as 'victims'
in the Bible. Babies are the innocent victims. Aborting women are
the guilty sinners (perpetrators).
This is the reason why we need a Savior. If a woman is led to believe that she
is not really a sinner, but a person who made poor decisions based on
misinformation, why would
she need the Savior's BLOOD?
This really is a crucial matter because, as
Charles Spurgeon said: "Every
truth leads towards holiness; every error of doctrine, directly or indirectly,
leads to sin." And, I believe with all of my heart that
millions of babies are murdered, in part, because of the worldly, humanistic
philosophy that tolerates sexual immorality & child-sacrifice & calls
the perpetrators 'victims'.
This whole fraudulent 'victim' mentality scam
is not from the Bible. Let the Word of God be true & every man a liar. Let
it be established that the Word of God is the absolute, authoritative way of
truth & life, here & in eternity. Biblical truths (including God's Law) are
not just 'important' for
salting & lighting the world, & in teaching us for our sanctification
& for evangelizing, they are INDISPENSIBLE!
"...if we walk in the
light, as He is in the light, we have fellowship with one another, and the
blood of Jesus His Son cleanses us from all sin." ~ I
John 1:7 We cannot & must not substitute the truth as it is in Jesus to
perpetuate fanciful, man-pleasing, self-indulgent philosophical, sociological,
psychological & soul-damning spiritual errors.
We cannot alter the verities of the Bible to
satisfy the whims & fancies of the humanistic psychologist's day. When you
make sinners into 'victims'
you are effectually dismissing & negating what God has to say to fallen (& redeemed) men &
women. The doctrines of original sin, human depravity, general revelation
cannot be compromised with fatally flawed humanistic worldly philosophies lest
they poison the well of life with falsehood. Jeremiah warned the people against
the flatteries & lies of false prophets who he exposes & rebukes
saying: "They have
healed also the hurt of the daughter of My people slightly, saying, 'Peace, peace'; when there is no peace." (Jer
6:14;8:11) Adam Clarke noted that the 'hurt'
is the SIN of the people: "Here
the prophets prophesied falsely; and the people continued in sin, being
deceived by the priests and the prophets."
I will not be a party to it. I want to clarify something. My writing is
against the lie of calling women who have murdered their babies 'victims'. That does not
mean that I am hard-hearted against these mothers. Half of all of the thousands
of moms I minister to have already killed one (or more) children. I have the
blessed opportunity to love them with both the mercy and truth of Christ every
week as we share the way of salvation outside abortuaries.
In our attempt not to be hard-of-heart towards aborting
& post-abortive women I fear that we have become hard hearted against the babies. We
have relegated the little boys & girls to impersonal terms like 'decision' 'choice' or 'option' .& the
women who have conceived them (most
by sexual immorality) become 'victims'.
It's crazy.
Perhaps some think I care too much about the
babies and not enough about the women who murder them. I'd like to ask them to
consider that maybe their 'concern'
for post-abortive mothers has caused them to care too LITTLE for the babies.
I'd like to ask a question of all those who
are convinced that women are VICTIMS of abortion. If people REALLY honestly
believe that women are VICTIMS of abortion, why aren't they lining the streets
outside the abortuaries, trying to SAVE the women from being 'victimized'? Where are
the tens of millions of living, so-called 'victims'
of child-sacrifice? They sure aren't out trying to stop other women from
killing their babies, I'll tell you that much. Most days there is NO ONE
outside the murder mills here in Raleigh. One of the killing places in Orlando
has had no Christian witness for YEARS. There has been no one intervening most
days at MANY of the abortuaries that we minister at. If so many people are
supposedly 'convinced' that women are being 'victimized' at these places, where
are these bleeding hearts they when the women come to kill their babies? Why
would they WAIT till after they were 'victimized'
to offer them 'support'
instead of intervening to prevent their 'victimization'?
When we encourage a woman who has sinned by
fornication & murder to look at herself as a 'victim' we do violence to the teaching of
the Bible & we do her a great disservice as well. Why? Because we let her
think that her own volitional acts against the Law of God were not that bad,
therefore, the bloody Cross of Christ is not that great.
Nancy Uhde, Patte, I'm hoping (and assuming -they say
that's bad) that you don't mind if I have been sharing this note far and wide
;)
Patte Smith, Absolutely, Nancy. Feel free. I believe that
until we stigmatize murdering innocent children it will continue to be
considered the sacred cow of 'difficult choice'.
If professing Christian people knew all about
what was happening at the death camps & were going around during the Nazi
holocaust saying: "These Nazi's are victims themselves. They need our
sympathy. They don't know what they are doing. Don't tell them that the Bible
says that they are wicked & they must repent & beg Jesus for mercy.
That will drive them away. And, don't worry about the Jews who are being
murdered at the death camps. Poor things, they will go straight to heaven
anyway, because they are God's chosen people. Now, let's invite the Nazis to
retreats. We don't want them to feel bad about themselves. Let's tell them that
they just need to be healed. Let's tell them that God loves & forgives
them".
Would that have been honoring to the Lord & would that have shown love to those who are being led to slaughter?
Would that have been honoring to the Lord & would that have shown love to those who are being led to slaughter?
Jacinta Reeve, Amen and God bless you Pattie. My twin 4 yr
old boys start school next year and my heart I believe is being prepared to go
to these killing places here in my home town. We had the boys when I was 42. I
aborted years ago, killed my baby for selfish reasons. Since tapping into your ministry over the
last months I have been able to repent and reflect on my actions. Thank you for
your bold truth. It’s hard to read
sometimes but worth knowing this truth and stirs the Spirit to council, comfort
and guide.
Carol Nicholson, Wow, Patte, that is deep. I looked it up the
scripture. What came to my mind as well, are the many false teachers,
especially so many that have written books that teach a broad road, misleading
many into hell. Many churches, and professing Christians help them by inviting
them to speak, and preach, then allowing them to sell their books and cd's, and
get rich. Then we must wonder, how much of this wealth goes into fishing for
souls. Then even if the answer is 100%, does this justify our helping them, and
exalting them?
Patte Smith, Jacinta, I am so
grateful to God for how He has given you deep understanding of your sin & a
deep comfort in His Son's saving blood. Those of us who know how wicked we are
& how much punishment Jesus has born for our sins, love Him much. Amen?
Patte Smith, Man's religion is to build up the creature.
God's religion is to throw the creature down in the dust of self-abasement, and to glorify Christ. ~ J.C Philpot
God's religion is to throw the creature down in the dust of self-abasement, and to glorify Christ. ~ J.C Philpot
The lady who tries to control pro-life
efforts here in Reading promotes the peaceful way to the point of ostracizing
someone who favors the more forceful and who addresses those entering mills this way—
“in the name of Jesus do not kill your baby.”
The fellow who says that gets into occasional
scuffles, as you can imagine, but he saves babies. The peaceful would-be controller does not.
________________________
-----------------------------------------
To
send money to the federal Prisoners, those with eight digits after their
names, make out a postal money order to the Prisoner’s name and number. Then send it to Federal Bureau of Prisons, PO
Box 474701, Des Moines, Iowa 50947-0001.
You can send a check directly to the others.
_________________________
------------------------------------------
Receipt
of this excellent missive notwithstanding, if you wish to be excluded from
such blessings in the future, simply advise me.
