"Contraception" is Murder, 10-1. May, 2012

Formerly,  Abortion is Murder, and, before that, skyp (stop the killing of young people)

 

May, 2012, Vol. 10   No. 1

PO Box 7424, Reading, PA 19603

Phone, 484-706-4375

Email, johndunk@ptd.net

Web, skyp1.blogspot.com

Circulation, 236

John Dunkle, Editor

 

  “Contraception”  is Murder, a weak, pathetic response to baby murder, is sent out at least once a month.  If the gestapo hasn’t jailed you for defending the innocent realistically, you either have to tell me you want it or go to the website.  Faxes and emails are free but snail-mail is free only for PFCs, $800 for others.

  Because I believe we should examine every legitimate means, including force, in our attempt to protect those being tortured to death, I want to hear from people who’ve been forceful and from those who defend them.  I’d also like to hear from those who oppose the use of force and call it violence

 

 

Prisoners for Christ:

 

1.                Evans, Paul Ross 83230-180, USP McCreary,  P.O. Box 3000, Pine Knot, KY 42635

2.                Gibbons, Linda, Vanier WDC, 655 Martin St., P.O. Box 1040, Milton, ON, Canada L9T 5E6

3.              Grady, Francis Gerald # 040368, Outagamie Co Jail 5HLD03L, P.O. Box 1779, Appleton, WI 54912-1779

4.                Griffin, Michael 310249,  5914 Jeff Ates Rd., Milton, FL 32583-0000

5.                Jordi, Stephen 70309-004, FCI P.O. Box 33, Terre Haute IN 47802    6/30 

6.                Knight, Peter James,  P.O. Box 376, Laverton, Victoria, Australia 

7.                Kopp, James 11761-055, USP Canaan, P.O. Box 300, 3057 Easton Tpk., Waymart, PA 18472 

8.                Little, David SJRCC, 930 Old Black River Road, Saint John, NB E2J 4T3

9.                Moose, Justin 27494-057   FCI Talladega, P.O. Box 1000, Talladega, AL 35160 

10.              Mower,  Donny Eugene 65828-097, FCI Terminal Island, PO Box 3007, San Pedro, CA 90731

11..             Richardson, Alonzo Lee 12898-021, CCM,  716 McDonough Blvd. SE, Atlanta, GA 30315

12.              Roeder, Scott P.  65192, PO Box 2, Lansing Kansas 66043

13.              Rogers, Bobby Joe 0202B, PO Box 17800, Pensacola, Florida 32522

14.              Rudolph, Eric 18282-058 US Pen. Max, Box 8500, Florence CO 81226-8500

15.              Shannon, Rachelle 59755-065, FCI Waseca, Unit A, P.O. Box 1731, Waseca, MN 56093    3/31

16.           Waagner, Clayton Lee 17258-039, United States Penitentiary, P.O. Box 1000, Lewisburg  PA 17837 

 

 

  I changed the name of the newsletter again because at this point even “pro-choice” folks know abortion is murder but not even prolifers know “contraception” is too – and causes hundreds of times the number of deaths, and leads directly to the killing of the older guys.

  Embryocide led to feticide, which led to infanticide (something Obama supports, by the way), which is leading to senicide (euthanasia), and will soon lead to other forms of legal homicide -- uxoricide, parricide, modernicide, ambicide, sorocide, etc.

  When the “stronger” are permitted to kill the “weaker” because the latter are females, or Irish, or Africans, or Jews, or young, or old, or sick, or of a different religion, then civilians have turned into barbarians.  We are now a nation of barbarians.

  My favorite pro-death writer, Pat Richards of the abortion.ws blog, knows this too.  Of course Pat tells himself he can’t figure out why some politicians like Santorum are concerned about it:

 

  “But the fact that they are even talking about this issue boggles my mind, especially in light of the fact that 95% of the Catholics in this country use birth control anyway – the Pope be damned.”

 

  Pat’s right about the 95%. That’s why we Catholics are mostly to blame for this on-going modern nightmare.

  -----------------------------------------

 

  The Catholic Bishops have formally responded to the HHS mandate put forth by the Obama administration (see attachment file). That mandate would seek to force churches, Christian business owners and parachurch ministries to provide health insurance with free "birth control" to their employees.
  I realize we are not all Catholics and that the media continues to frame this as a "Catholic issue." It is not. It is a matter all Christians need to consider as hormonal "birth control" products do work at least some of the time by causing an early abortion. This occurs when a fertilized egg, an embryo, cannot travel through artificially thickened mucous, as well as when the embryo cannot implant with success because the products produce a hostile, deciduous endometrium.
  I recommend reading Randy Alcorn's booklet, "Does the Birth Control Pill Cause Abortion?" You will find it online at http://www.epm.org/resources/2010/Feb/16/longer-condensation-does-birth-control-pill-cause-/ .
  Please take the time to resist this mandate. If we do not resist at this stage, many will make sinful compromises in order to comply with the government. Others will be punished as they refuse to comply. Christians who choose to honor God and resist the mandate will face fines, loss of business licenses, even imprisonment somewhere down the road if they choose to maintain a business without government licensing in order to feed their families. We need to resist, both for those weak in the faith, as well as for those who will resist no matter that the government  commands this.

  Catherine Ramey, M.Div.

 

  Here are Al’s comments on passages from the last newsletter,  April 2.  I’ve bracketed the passages:

 

  You wrote:

 

  [I got kicked out of “Pro-Life Berks” for advocating self-defense. So I went off on my own.]

 

  That's because they do not believe the unborn child has a right to defend herself.

  They condemn the "Silent Scream" victim for struggling against the suction tube. . . .  

  The inhumanity that issues from baronies within the right-to-life movement is well known: the craziness of a crusade against birth control; the view of women as second-class citizens; even the descent into bomb-throwing madness. The insistence that an unborn child must always be saved, no matter the cost, isn't compassion but a compassionate mask, and it obscures a face of cruelty.

  The "craziness of a crusade against birth control" was the standard position of almost all of Christendom until 1853 when the Catholic Church first approved birth control: scheduled abstinence or the rhythm method. Most more enlightened non-Christian religions are opposed at least to some degree to abortion. Hinduism: "bad karma." Mohammedanism forbids abortion after 120 days gestation.

  As "birth control" takes in all methods from abstinence to abortion, what is so "crazy"?

  How does trying to protect women from being pressured into killing their children make them "second-class citizens"? A number of the early suffragettes were vehemently opposed to abortion as they saw it not only as murdering the child but victimizing the mother: Susan B. Anthony for one.

  Find ONE pro-lifer/anti-abortionist who has ever thrown a bomb.

  Out of millions of pro-life/anti-abortion activists only a tiny number have ever even so much as physically attacked an abortuary. A few have set fires but none of them with firebombs. I can recall only one explosive bomb ever used against an abortuary.

  I have never encountered a single pro-lifer/anti-abortionist who "insist[s] that an unborn child must always be saved, no matter the cost."

 

[I’ve never heard of our almost hero, Daniel Ware, and googling him didn‘t answer much.]

 

  I know Daniel. He has visited and stayed with us. I haven't seen or heard from or of him in 15 years. We met him at the Paul Hill railroading in Pensacola in 1994.

 

  [“If someone is raped by her father and becomes pregnant (etc.), is Scott going to foot the bill for the child’s upbringing and care?”]

 

  No. The rapist is responsible. Rent him out as a slave and force him to work to pay.

  That aside, there are many organizations that will help or entirely provide for the mother and child in such circumstances.

  I saved a young woman from a further pistol-whipping, robbery and rape in 1980. As I saved her from further abuse, and perhaps saved her life, am I responsible for taking care of her?

 

  [The device, a bottle containing gasoline, was the source of a fire, which extinguished itself before emergency personnel arrived. The fire reportedly caused minimal damage.]

 

  He didn't know how to make a Molotov cocktail. . . .

 

  I’m omitting the four paragraphs where Al tells us how to make one.  

 

  The preceding is only for your entertainment. "Don't attempt this at home." It's OK, righteous even, for government to drop or pour this stuff on "The Enemy" but if you use it on the facilities of mass murderers who have murdered more Americans than have been killed (both Americans and "The Enemy") by US war actions, you are an Enemy of the People, and probably, in Flippo Benham's opinion, even an "Enemy of the Cross."

  Former Sen. Rick Santorum said in a statement, “While we can and should work to defund Planned Parenthood and push back against government mandates that force Americans and religious institution to violate their faith, violence against our fellow citizens has no place in a freedom-loving America.”

 

  And just how does he think abortionists and their accomplices will be stopped? Just send them letters in the mail asking them pwetty pwease to stop killing babies?

  Oh - it's OK for "gummint" to use force against criminals but self-defense and defense of the innocent isn't if you don't have a badge?

  -------------------------------------

 

  Uh oh, looks as if Planned Parenthood  has entrapped Ricky as well as Chris.  This PP memo, sent to mill managers a while after Paul Hill’s execution, turned up recently:

 

Please note the following:

 

1.   Have no interaction whatsoever with protesters at your clinics.  If you have to pass by them as you arrive or leave, act as if they are not there. 

 

2.   We must stop other anti-choicers from imitating Hill.  If the numbers are accurate about the medical professionals who have left or are now avoiding our branch of medicine, we are being seriously threatened.  Remember, persuading doctors to enter the field has always been our most difficult task.

 

3.  To accomplish this we must repeat again and again that what Hill did was violent and violence has no place in the “pro-life” movement, and we must work hard to get the antis to embrace this belief. 

  Well-known anti-choicers should be targeted.  We have already persuaded a popular politician, Chris Smith from New Jersey, and a popular leader, Jack Wilke from Washington,  to focus their ire more on the “Paul Hill Types” than on us.  Persuading other “prolifers” to join them is a top priority (see #5).

 

4.  Another difficult task we have is to keep our clinics “insurance viable.”  If the insurance companies decide that we are too risky to insure, we will be out of business.  We must try to keep hidden our vulnerability here, and we must tie in clinic vandalism with Hill-type murder.   When fires are set, stink-bombs exploded, windows broken, paint splattered, and so on, we must “scream bloody murder,” and we must persuade anti-choicers to join us in our outrage.  We must help those antis who have adopted the “loving, peaceful, lawful” mantra to grow even stronger and maintain their leadership positions among the anti-choicers.

 

5.  An excellent way of controlling the anti-choice movement and weakening its ability to damage us is to use spies.  A good spy is able to gain the confidence of the anti-choicers, get into a leadership position, and stop them from being effective.   For one thing, the spy can determine who among the anti-choicers are the most threatening to our business; then she can usually get rid of them by attacking them publicly.  Another way the spy can help is by leading her followers away from an area where they might hurt us into an area where they are less of a threat.   A third way is to cause division – concentrate on the Catholic rosary whenever Protestants are around; persuade the “peaceful, prayerful, loving”  antis to avoid those who think defensive action is permissible; “stir the pot” to discourage mild anti-choicers from joining a group where emotions run high; and do anything else to keep the group from expanding.

  A fourth way the spy is invaluable is with her behavior towards our patients.  We want these women to experience comfort, relief, and satisfaction rather than fear, anger, and regret.  (Remember, their experience shared, determines in large part the success of our business.) The spy can best accomplish this by talking softly and encouragingly to our customers and discouraging those who would upset them.

  Spies do not come cheap but they are worth their weight in gold.  We now have eighteen and we need seventeen more.  If you are interested, get back to us right away and we can talk strategy and cost.

  -----------------------------------

 

  Keeping you up to date on my favorite pro-death blog, abortion.ws:

 

  Me -- Reactionary Kate Ranieri’s unreadable diatribe on the 4/25 abortion.ws blog attacks Joe, one of the toughest guys I ever met. Unreadable or not, the illiterates over there will love it as they love all hate-filled, pro-baby-killing posts. (The three literates will probably say nothing.)

  What I can’t figure out, though, is why Kate is not afraid of tough guys but is scared to death of weak old me.  Last Saturday she and two of her followers were hurling insults at Joe until I walked around to that side of the building. I’d hardly opened my mouth before Kate fled, pulling the acolytes with her.

  Now I love illiterates. I spent my life trying to make them literate, and sometimes succeeding.  Maybe a couple of the abortion.ws ones can visit the Allentown Women’s Center Saturday mornings to observe Kate’s strange behavior and to learn from me.  Nothing but good could come of that and it might even make Kate liberal.

 

  Pat Richards -- Let’s clarify, John. Are you saying Kate was there and you showed up and she saw you and she FLED? As if she saw you, was frightened and ran away? C’mon, Johnny boy, is that what really happened?

 

  Me – That’s exactly what I’m saying, Pat.  Kate might use a different participle (repelled?); I’d love to hear her side of the story.  But that is exactly what happened.

  (These days I respond only to the featured post over at abortion.ws.  My other responses kept getting erased.    From now on I’ll use the newsletter here to comment on comments.)

  -------------------------------------------

 

  I love what Terry Hughes says here in this passage Mike Bray sent.  The connection with baby killing is that all these global warmists ultimately fall back on the argument that we have to kill  people to keep the earth from getting overcrowded.

 

  The following is an excerpt from some ongoing casual email commentary from my friend, Terry Hughes, Professor Emeritus of Earth Sciences and Climate Change, University of Maine. Enjoy the perspective you don't hear from the scientists with an ideology to grind.

  Dear All:
  Every time I comment on "man-caused" global warming, I include my rebuttal to those who insist it would be a catastrophe. So I will repeat my rebuttal once more. Global warming, man-caused or otherwise, would be a BLESSING. The population-control racists, almost always Liberal Progressives who embrace Darwin's view and the view of the 1902 Encyclopedia Britannica that Black people are subhuman compared to White people, but will no longer state that openly, insist that carbon dioxide is a "toxic" gas. Plants LOVE carbon dioxide. To plants it's what oxygen is to us. And WE depend on plants to survive. Plants don't depend on us. Agricultural production would SOAR with more atmospheric carbon dioxide. The climate warming it would facilitate would open the Arctic sea ice back from Arctic coastlines, opening the Northeast and Northwest Passages to the Orient, cutting shipping costs (distances) in half. Arctic permafrost would thaw, opening one-seventh of Earth's surface to petroleum, natural gas, coal, mineral, and agricultural development, with vast lands open for expansion of the human population and the cities, farms, and seaports they would build. And let's not forget the human potential for creativity that would be released. Liberal Progressives see people, especially non-White people, as mouths to feed not as minds to nurture. In Arctic and sub-Arctic latitudes, there could be TWO harvests per summer because of 18 to 24 hours of sunlight per day (photosynthesis for plants). Land opened by warming would be ten times land lost by rising sea level in the worst-case scenario of sea-level rise. And we don't even know if and how much sea level might rise.
  The Liberal Progressive fear mongers have NO ANSWER to these points. That's why they brand us as troglodytes at best and hate-mongers at worst, when it is THEY who hurl these invectives at those who disagree with them. Two can play that game. I would like to read a sober SCIENTIFIC objection to the points I've made above.     

   I'm waiting,

 

  I’ll just add that I’m old enough to have lived through the “evolution” excuse to kill others as I am now living through “global warming” excuse.  The argument then, endlessly repeated as now, was “we’re just apes anyway, and animals kill other animals all the time.”  But being simply animals, if true, might benefit us, as Terry says global warming would, because most people love animals.

  -------------------------------------------

 

How Liberals Distort The English Language to Deceive and Manipulate    

                 by David  L. Goetsch

 

  Because they convey meaning, words can powerful tools. Hence, they should be used with care. Like most tools, words can be dangerous if used improperly. In fact, they can become weapons. Depending on the intentions of the speaker, words can either inform and communicate or deceive and manipulate. For two decades, liberal wordsmiths have been distorting the English language to deceive and manipulate Americans. So why do liberals find it necessary to distort the English language to deceive and manipulate? The answer is simple: because many liberal beliefs, practices, and policies are reprehensible to the American public. If these beliefs, practices, and policies were called what they really are, Americans would rise up and reject them.

  One of the best examples of how liberals distort the English language to deceive can be found in what they call themselves: “progressives.” If the American left is progressive, then what is progress? Is bankrupting the American economy progress? Is using government entitlements to garner political support progress? Is encouraging an entitlement mentality progress? Is promoting a victim mentality progress? Is perpetuating racial strife progress? Is transforming America’s public schools and colleges into leftist indoctrination centers progress? If these things are considered progress, then the left is certainly progressive. But if these are seen for what they really are, the left should stop calling itself progressive and start calling itself destructive.

  For another example of how the left distorts the English language to deceive and manipulate Americans, consider the term abortion. Abortion conjures up images that liberals want to avoid at all costs, images of unborn children being brutally torn apart in their mothers’ wombs. Not an image most people, including liberals, would want to be associated with. Consequently, liberal wordsmiths went looking for a different term, a term that would conjure up positive images.

  In the process, abortion became choice, a term that not only distorts what actually happens during an abortion, but turns the discussion away from killing babies to supporting women’s rights. The new term was well chosen, particularly if your purpose is to deceive. After all most people want to be in control of their lives, to be able to make choices. Liberals want abortion to be about a woman’s right to choose, but they don’t want to talk about what that choice really means, nor do they want to admit that the unborn child has no say in the choice.

  Another example of how liberals distort the English language to deceive and manipulate can be seen in their use of the term gay instead of homosexual. The word homosexual conjures up an image of sodomy, not a pleasant image. But the term gay is different. It is synonymous with pleasant sounding terms such as happy, joyful, cheerful, and glad. The fact that homosexuality is sodomy is not changed by giving it a nicer sounding name. But liberals understand that if you tell a lie often enough for long enough, people will come to accept it. This is exactly what is happening in America today with regard to homosexuality.

  A practice that was once considered so reprehensible to American society that its proponents had to stay in the closet is now widely accepted. In fact, homosexuals have made substantial inroads during the Obama administration. They may now openly display their sexual preferences while serving in the military and, in a growing number of instances, may even marry.

  To see just how successful the left has been in distorting the English language to manipulate public opinion on this issue, just ask yourself this question: When was the last time you heard a journalist use the term “homosexual”? In fact, when was the last time you heard anyone use the term? Rather, the term “gay” has gained almost universal acceptance. Even those who oppose homosexuality typically use the term “gay.”

  Adopting the very terms used to manipulate you, is a sure sign that the other side is winning the battle. In other words, when conservatives allow liberals to dictate the words that will be used to describe controversial socio-cultural practices such as homosexuality, they are ceding ground on an important battlefield in America’s culture war. Words have meaning. As such they can be either useful tools or powerful weapons. The left has chosen to use them as weapons, and they are wielding these weapons with great effect.

  But there remains one inescapable fact the left cannot overcome in waging a culture war against conservative and Christian principles. If liberals cannot call the practices they favor by their real names, they are making a tacit admission that these practices are wrong. If these practices were right, liberals would be proud of them and would call them what they really are.

 

  Neal Horsley and his enemies are on the warpath again.  The topic here is the prolife use of force.  I’ve selected a few of their exchanges you might find interesting:

 

  Neal,  The babies need to be defended from being murdered. The message of the gospel is irrelevant to their defense, exactly as it would be if I saw your child being abducted by a child molester and I responded by quoting John 3:16.
  Many Christians in antebellum South likewise responded to the "niggers'" need for political action that would abolish slavery by idiotically reiterating the message of the Gospel; instead of giving them what they NEEDED: equal legal status with non-niggers. The babies are in this way the new niggers. Their cruel slaveholders need to be FORCED TO LET THEM go, whether they voluntarily yield to the gospel or not.

  Jonathon,  This is why Neal reasonably referred to you as a moron. Only a fool would suggest that evil people killing innocent people need only be responded to with the Gospel message to the exclusion of political and defensive force. You don't apply this standard to your own sweet ass or the needs of those you love. This calloused, sanctimonious moronic response is why the babies continue dying legally. Satan would've loved to've pulled this scenario off centuries of Christian history ago, but he had to patiently wait for this moronic generation to grace the scene. Unless you repent, you won't like Jesus when you meet Him.

 

  Enemy,  Do you suggest that the savage killing of 620,000 men in the civil war was right and justified? On what grounds in the Gospel do we kill hundreds of thousands of people to force slavery to end? Talk about unclear on the concept.
  In your email, you say, "Only a fool would suggest that evil people killing innocent people need only be responded to with the Gospel message to the exclusion of political and defensive force." The North invaded the south, so the defenders of slavery were also the defenders of their land and homes against that aggression. Your analogy completely breaks down.
  We do need better defensive action, but not violence. What if a thousand persons were densely packed around the baby butcher's premises. They could not do business, and there are not enough cops and jails to haul them all off to.

  Jonathon,  The failure is not our unwillingness to use violence, but our thin numbers inadequate to do effective non-violent action.  If thousands were packed around the killing center, that would be defensive action, not the Gospel message. If Christians had given the black people defensive action, God wouldn't have turned the whole nation over to the punitive slaughter that was the war between the states. There is a sense in which everything true Christians do, including service in the ministry of the law, is an organic outgrowth of the gospel message. But the ministry of the law, whether performed by a Christian or not, applies equally to all people who are lawbreakers whether or not they reject the gospel. And yes, when necessary, it involves violence.

  ------------------------------------------

 

  I’ve been visiting the homes of the baby killers with my A KILLER LIVES HERE sign since 1970. The latest, whom I plan to visit on May 20, is Jimmy Anasti.  Jimmy’s been killing people for about a half year now at the Planned Parenthood mill here in Reading. Occasionally I get nasty phone calls and vile, anonymous letters and emails.  A few, though, are like this:

 

  Dear John,  Several of my neighbors received a copy of your letter expressing your concern about a neighbor of ours who is in the medical profession and in his field performs legal abortions. I shared your letter with members of our prayer and Bible study group last evening at our church. We included you and our neighbor in our prayers.

  Jesus tells us "we are to love our neighbor as ourselves." He does not specify anything about what that neighbor does. Can we show our Christian faith and love for this doctor by harassing him and his family in their private residence on a Sunday afternoon? In practicing what you suggest we would also be harassing the neighbors who live next door.

  Every member of our group strongly oppose the killing of anyone - not only unborn babies. Can we not find positive ways to express our concerns which may serve to convince those who participate in the taking of human life?  We can certainly pray for them and it does not have to be in a public arena outside their place of operation or private home. We can pray for the young women who are desperate enough to seek this answer to an unwanted pregnancy. We can commit to working with Crisis Pregnancy Centers to help young women choose to give unwanted children up for adoption and then find good homes for these little ones. We can support young women who choose to keep and raise this "formerly unwanted" child.

  We would strongly encourage you to reconsider your decision to invade our neighborhood on Sunday afternoons seeking to embarrass or shame one of our neighbors by creating a public scene in the guise of saving lives. We are a bit curious as to why you chose this particular doctor and our neighborhood as a place to vent your zeal.

Sincerely,  ____________

 

  I emailed back:

 

  Hi _________,  Thanks so much for you May 3 letter about my planned May 20 prayer vigil outside of Jimmy Anasti’s home on Powder Way.  I didn’t open it till a minute ago because I thought it was a dues request from a Mennonite Church around here that I support.

  You’ve offered a number of reasons why I should not carry out the planned vigil.  I’ll respond to just one here; otherwise, we’d get bogged down: “Jesus tells us ‘we are to love our neighbor as ourselves’.  He does not specify anything about what that neighbor does.”

  Oh, but ________, he does!  Some of his neighbors were desecrating the Temple and he grabbed a weapon and attacked them (tough love)!  Pulling the arms and legs off young people is a lot worse than desecrating the Temple.  If he were walking around today,  I wonder what Jesus would do to people like Jimmy?

  But thanks again for writing and, especially, not anonymously.  I’ve been doing this for years and it’s very rare for an opponent to stand on her or his own two feet.

 

  I sent this email the next day:

 

  Now ____, let’s look at paragraph 3 where you say that every member of your group strongly opposes the killing of anyone - not only unborn babies.

  Let’s assume, then, that it again becomes legal to kill Jews.  You would, of course, oppose that.  You would pray for those who participate in killing them (but not near their private homes nor places of operation).  You would pray for those so desperate to get rid of the unwanted that they have to resort to killing them.  You would commit to working with Jewish Help Centers to try to convince the potential killers to deport rather than kill;   you’d even go so far as to try to get the Jews deported to nice places.  And, finally, you’d support those who find out that can live with Jews, who don’t have to resort to killing them or deporting them.

  Your heart, then, ____, would be in the right place.  But what about others who feel the same way you do but decide they should do other things as well? Some like me decide that they should make their opposition public.   Others decide that the new little Auschwitzes where the murders take place should be damaged, demolished if possible.  Still others decide that the most effective way to save Jews is to stop their killers in their tracks (see Paul Hill).

  You might not agree with any of these methods of opposing this new “German Holocaust,” ____, but don’t you think you should let other prolifers have the freedom of choice?  Must you spend time opposing their choices when the killers out there are still running wild?

  Now here’s the kicker: Jews are not legally being murdered again, unborn babies are.  And make no mistake, if we continue to allow the killers to have their way, Jews, or old folks, or Catholics, or the disabled, or Mennonites, or some other group will be next on their list.

  ------------------------------------------

 

  To send money to the federal Prisoners, those with eight digits after their names, make out a postal money order to the Prisoner’s name and number.  Then send it to Federal Bureau of Prisons, PO Box 474701, Des Moines, Iowa 50947-0001. You can send a check directly to the others.

 -------------------------------------------

 

  Receipt of this excellent missive notwithstanding, if you wish to be excluded from such blessings in the future, simply advise me.

  -----------------------------------------