Formerly, Abortion is Murder, and, before that, skyp (stop the killing of young people)
August, 2012, Vol. 10 No. 4
PO Box 7424, Reading, PA 19603
Phone, 484-706-4375
Web, skyp1.blogspot.com
Circulation, 203
John Dunkle, Editor
“Contraception” is Murder, a weak, pathetic response to baby
murder, is sent out at least once a month.
If the gestapo hasn’t jailed you for defending the innocent
realistically, you either have to tell me you want it or go to the
website. Emails are free but snail-mail
is free only for PFCs, $800 for others.
Because
I believe we should examine every legitimate means, including force, in our
attempt to protect those being tortured to death, I want to hear from people
who’ve been forceful and from those who defend them. I’d also like to hear from those who oppose
the prolife use of force and call it violence
Prisoners For Christ:
1. Evans, Paul Ross 83230-180,
USP McCreary, P.O. Box 3000, Pine Knot,
KY 42635
2. Gibbons, Linda, Vanier WDC, 655 Martin St., P.O. Box 1040, Milton,
ON, Canada L9T 5E6
3. Grady, Francis Gerald # 040368, Outagamie
Co Jail 5HLD03L, P.O. Box 1779, Appleton, WI 54912-1779
4. Griffin, Michael 310249,
5914 Jeff Ates Rd., Milton, FL 32583-0000
5. Holt, Gregory 129616, Varner Super Max, P. O. Box 600, Grady AR
71644-0600
6. Jordi,
Stephen 70309-004, FCI P.O. Box 33, Terre Haute IN 47802 6/30
7. Knight,
Peter James, P.O. Box 376, Laverton,
Victoria, Australia
8. Kopp,
James 11761-055, USP Canaan, P.O. Box 300, 3057 Easton Tpk., Waymart, PA
18472
9. Little, David SJRCC, 930
Old Black River Road, Saint John, NB E2J 4T3
10. Moose, Justin 27494-057 FCI Talladega, P.O. Box 1000, Talladega, AL
35160
11. Mower, Donny Eugene
65828-097, FCI Terminal Island, PO Box 3007, San Pedro, CA 90731
12.. Richardson, Alonzo Lee 12898-021, CCM, 716 McDonough Blvd.
SE, Atlanta, GA 30315
13. Roeder, Scott P. 65192, PO Box 2, Lansing Kansas 66043
14. Rogers,
Bobby Joe, Santa Rosa County Jail,
P.O. Box 7129, Milton FL 32572
15. Rudolph, Eric 18282-058 US Pen. Max,
Box 8500, Florence CO 81226-8500
16. Shannon, Rachelle 59755-065, FCI
Waseca, Unit A, P.O. Box 1731, Waseca, MN 56093 3/31
17. Waagner, Clayton Lee 17258-039, United
States Penitentiary, P.O. Box 1000, Lewisburg
PA 17837
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jimbo
Is Excommunicated!
Jimbo,
James Charles Kopp, Prisoner For Christ in the Federal Penitentiary in Waymart,
Pa., and most prolific BB (behind bars) prolifer extent (well, let’s say tied
with Eric Rudolph for that honor), has been excommunicated.
Jimbo became a Catholic in the 80s.
Muslims observe their faith religiously and
Jimbo, being attracted to all thing religious, began sitting in on their prison
gatherings. When he decided to join them
this year for Ramadan, a nominal Catholic from Boston told the chaplin. The chaplin, Fr. Pham from Vietnam, would
have none of it.
“If you observe Ramadan,” Father said, “you
may not receive Communion.”
So Jimbo now may not receive Communion
(that’s what excommunicated means). He
fulfills his obligation as a Catholic to attend Sunday Mass (once a Catholic
always a Catholic) but he abstains from Communion.
God understands. I asked him.
But he said he would not be quite so
understanding with those religious who are obliged to correct Catholics like
Nancy Pelosi, Joe Biden, almost any Kennedy, Kathy Sibelius, etc., but who do
not correct them.
Then he said he will be even less
understanding with those who do correct but who do nothing when these
anti-Catholic Catholics refuse to accept correction and continue with their
anti-Catholic behavior, and receive Communion too.
--------------------------------------------
Lorraine
Dennis Maguire (LDM) is a former manager of a baby killing mill. Nowadays she just argues the pro-killing
position, and usually so illiterately that I can’t stand it. But then, when I
am about to give up entirely, she says something interesting. For example:
In
his post this week Pat Richards on the abortion.ws blog decries the fact that
NARAL stops supporting pro-death politicians over even one small prolife
vote. LDM comments:
Pat…you
are so right!! Many of the “pro-choice groups” will drop you like a “hot rock”
if you DO NOT…(blindly follow them)!! . . . . I have NEVER understood how we
can turn our backs on someone when they have supported us over the years when
they “say or do something” that is NOT… “Bullet point by bullet point” exactly
what the organization says . . . I am always very “sad” when we turn our backs
on our own . . . Since Dr. Tiller was murdered in his church on a beautiful
Sunday morning…the number of M.D.’s that are trained to do this type of
abortion has decreased dramatically!! . . . .
I wrote right in:
Holy
Moly: “Since Dr. Tiller was murdered in
his church on a beautiful Sunday morning…the number of M.D.’s that are trained
to do this type of abortion has decreased dramatically!!”
The
people on our side who condemn what Scott did (99% of us) would never say that,
even if we knew it to be true. It takes one of the killers’ helpers to
publicize what we all suspect — that only the use of force will do real damage to
the rampaging, pro-killing tank. The rest is “feel-good-stuff” God help us.
LDM,
you make my newsletter for the first time. I am happy you didn’t go when I tried to chase
you.
--------------------------------------
Rev. Don Spitz, The Great, emailed this:
I
just got off the phone w/ Ralph Lang 608-301-1726. Call him if you like. If you are interested, his mailing address
is:
Ralph Lang
Mendota Mental Health Institute
301 Troy Drive, Madison, WI 53704
301 Troy Drive, Madison, WI 53704
(He is a committed Catholic
person)
me: I tried, Rev., but hung up after ten rings.
I’ll try again later. What’s his story.
Rev: Hi John, His story is below, from a liberal
paper. He is in a mental faculty to be tested if he is able to stand trial. He
told me he was found competent to stand trial, both federal and state. Double
jeopardy does not apply to pro-lifers. If you call the facility, during the
day, they may be in groups or something, the evening is probably best, or
tomorrow which is a holiday.
NEW
YORK -- A man has been arrested after traveling to Madison, Wis. with the alleged
intention of killing abortion doctors.
Ralph
Lang, 63, was charged by federal prosecutors Thursday for attempting to injure
or intimidate a person who provides reproductive health services. He traveled
approximately 100 miles from Marshfield, Wis. to Madison on May 25. He is
scheduled to appear in United States District Court on Friday.
A
63-year old man was arrested by Madison Police Wednesday night after he
discharged a handgun inside his motel room. The round hit two doors, but there
were no injuries. The man immediately told motel staff about the gunfire,
saying it was an accident. He offered to pay for damages. According to federal prosecutors, Lang told Madison police that he had the gun "to lay out
abortionists because they are killing babies."
He
was arrested at 9:51 pm at a Motel 6 just 1.2 miles away from Planned
Parenthood: Madison East (CRHC).
The Wisconsin State Journal reports that Lang told officer Angie Dyer that he planned to go to the Planned Parenthood when it opened the next day and shoot the doctor who performed abortions "right in the head."
The Wisconsin State Journal reports that Lang told officer Angie Dyer that he planned to go to the Planned Parenthood when it opened the next day and shoot the doctor who performed abortions "right in the head."
Lang
said he had been in Madison with a gun last week, but was having "spiritual
struggles" and was not "100 percent in sync with God" so he did
not shoot anyone.
Lang
had a history of targeting Planned Parenthood buildings. Court documents said
he was arrested in 2007 outside a Madison branch, telling officers that
everyone in the building deserved to be executed and that police were failing
in their jobs by not carrying out the executions. Lang received a disorderly
conduct citation, according to court records.
A
Wisconsin state Senate committee approved a bill on Wednesday -- the day of
Lang's arrest -- that would allow residents to carry concealed weapons without
getting permits or receiving any training. The bill, approved 3-2, would allow
those over the age of 21 to carry guns in locations excluding schools, jails,
prisons, courthouses and law enforcement offices. The bill has yet to go to
vote.
Planned Parenthood opposes the bill.
Planned Parenthood opposes the bill.
This
incident occurred days before the two-year anniversary of abortion doctor
George Tiller's murder. Tiller was shot in the forehead by Scott Roeder, who
prosecutors found guilty of first degree murder. Roeder is now serving life
without the chance of parole.
In
February of this year, a law
was proposed in South Dakota that would expand the
definition of "justifiable homicide" to include killing those who
present imminent harm to fetuses, which would legalize the murder of abortion
doctors. A nearly
identical bill was proposed in Nebraska a week after the
South Dakota bill was shelved.
Me: I love this story, Rev. That’s me! I can never repay you my debt.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Two letters from Jimbo, the first to
Jennifer McKinnley and the second to Archbishop Chaput:
1. Summerhill TV 56, Shaftesbury Ave., Toronto
Can., M4T 1A3
Dear Jennifer McKinley,
I'm
really not very good for quotes. The
best one on this subject I ever heard was from a man who pushed his daughter
into scheduling an AB at Dr. Slepian's clinic for October 24, 1998, the day
after he sadly died (not my intention).
He
said: "God bless you, Mr.
Kopp. Because of you I am now the
grandfather of a seven-year-old granddaughter who is the apple of my eye. My daughter turned around and went back home
after she saw blue lights flashing at the mill that Saturday morning. God bless you. I can't believe I came so close to killing my
own grandbaby.”
I met
this interesting man in the mid-Oughts.
If
anyone asks me how I feel about all this, I always ask, "What would you do
if someone put a gun to the head of your own daughter?" I've asked
thousands; I only get one answer.
I'm
glad you looked at Silent No More but I got no feel from you how it impacted
you or whether you will quote one of these brave women.
This
means a lot to me: all my emotion on the subject arises from no place other
than the women I've met post-AB, many of them ten minutes post AB; many, ten
years post-AB.
By
now, if SNM has "magnetized" your search and your heart,
you'll start to recognize the women around you who are suffering, many millions
up there and down here. Quote these
women word-for-word before you quote me, I humbly suggest.
Most Sincerely, James C. Kopp
P.S. Just in case you get through to Miss
O'Neill, I'd be grateful if you'd be so kind as to do me a favor. I wouldn’t be here if it weren't for the
brutally forced AB done on a polio victim who couldn't run away and tried to,
screaming and crying all the way (See, Welles, “Fresno 1983”).
If
Miss O'Neill ever runs into that woman in the course of her marvelous ministry,
I’d be so grateful if she could apologize to her on my behalf.
I
could've stopped that AB with simple actions, but prolifers stopped me. Sadly, that was the exact moment I fell
out-with the mainstream movement.
PPS.
Another thing that died that day was the political ideology called
“choice.” Any prolifer knows this, Miss
O'Neill will tell you, that all women who sign off do so only due to subtle or
unsubtle bullying by one or more of a “ring of powerful males,” all of whom
have summat to gain (boyfriend, husband, college prof., boss, father, doc,
etc.).
In
repleteness, though, in a discussion on this exact point, Mother Teresa told me,
“But they know." Later, I disagreed
with Sr. Clarissa about this due to the PP access to grade schools where we're
excluded. She insisted nevertheless.
Ms.
T. also said "And did you have a nice sleep?" the day she found out
I'd just spent my first night in jail.
She was a character, that one.
Bailed me out of the clink in Trastevere one day, too. What a character.
PPS.
The Welles book has tons of quotes.
PPS.
Don't forget the Canadian chapter of £DOJ] Vito Squad.
2.
H.E. Archbishop Chaput .
Chancery
Archdiocese of Philadelphia
Our Lady of Perpetual Help, St. Ladislaus, 27
Jun 2012
Dear Your Excellency,
The
Peace of the Lord be with you forever, but especially today!
Hoping you received my previous about tax resistance.
A
recent Inside the Vatican said H.E. Dolan will pay a fine rather than
buy Obamacare insurance that would hand out abortifacient drugs.
Paying for abortifacient drugs is mortally sinful whether it is done
through premiums or by paying a non-compliance penalty to the fed., which we
know for a fact will use the money to give abortifacient drugs to someone
else—anybody else.
Murder is murder. We can have no
part in it.
It
compounds the sin when the money used to poison children to death -- anybody's
children -- was money donated in good faith by lay people who entrusted it to
you to be used for Godly things.
I
implore and request you in the Name of Jesus and under pain of sin -- do not
pay premiums or a penalty, either one.
There
are worse things than jail. Hell, for
one.
With
humility and charity in Our Lord and with His Blessed Mother.
James C. Kopp
skyp1.blogspot.com (USP-CAA-BOP)
P.S.
If 10% of the bishops hang tough -- a reasonable estimate -- jail risk
is slight. L'audace, l'audace, toujours
l'audace!
P.P.S.
None of Scripture nor 20 centuries of teaching ever promised no
jail. Action based on avoiding jail in
this context is likely error, especially in our indulgent culture.
cc:
H.E Dolan, ITV
--------------------------------------------
Dr. Frank writes from New York:
Regarding
the following:
Well, let's see, should a Catholic vote for Obama or Romney? Why don't we just make that -- who should any person of any faith vote for?
If a person has no respect for the traditional marriage, between one man and one woman, then vote for Obama.
If a person has an affinity for the homosexual lifestyle, then vote for Obama.
If a person has no respect for human life and tearing little children apart in the womb with many suffering excruciating pain, doesn't bother you, then vote for Obama.
If a person has a penchant for socialism/communism then vote for Obama.
The choice is clear.
Obama should be soundly defeated -- a massacre -- the worst defeat by any president in the history of our country, if only voters would just ask themselves, who would Jesus Christ vote for? And who would satan vote for?
The problem is that morality and Democrats don't mix. They vote the party line and if the Democrat candidate was the devil, himself, they would vote for him. You think I'm kidding? Well, the closest thing we have to the devil in this world is Barack Hussein Obama. He's a hypocrite, a first class liar and a monster -- look up the definition.
Well, let's see, should a Catholic vote for Obama or Romney? Why don't we just make that -- who should any person of any faith vote for?
If a person has no respect for the traditional marriage, between one man and one woman, then vote for Obama.
If a person has an affinity for the homosexual lifestyle, then vote for Obama.
If a person has no respect for human life and tearing little children apart in the womb with many suffering excruciating pain, doesn't bother you, then vote for Obama.
If a person has a penchant for socialism/communism then vote for Obama.
The choice is clear.
Obama should be soundly defeated -- a massacre -- the worst defeat by any president in the history of our country, if only voters would just ask themselves, who would Jesus Christ vote for? And who would satan vote for?
The problem is that morality and Democrats don't mix. They vote the party line and if the Democrat candidate was the devil, himself, they would vote for him. You think I'm kidding? Well, the closest thing we have to the devil in this world is Barack Hussein Obama. He's a hypocrite, a first class liar and a monster -- look up the definition.
----------------------------------------------
Cal writes from Hawaii:
Dear John, Alan Sears is
at the helm of the Alliance Defending Freedom, formerly the Alliance Defense
Fund. Sears' article ("Why Do Abortion Advocates Hate Ultrasound
Pictures?," LifeNews.com, 7/18/12) shows one side of an important picture.
But on the other side of the picture we see a different story, "Why Do
Pro-Life Advocates Hate Personhood Amendments?" Then it dawned on me, they
hate the responsibility. They fear being called upon to have the courage to stand
up for the person, so they invent a fictional world where they can advocate
"life" while excusing themselves from defense of the person.
Is Cal
kidding? Lots of us defend the person
about to be tortured to death as she should be defended. Let’s see, there’s Shelley, Jimbo, Michael,
Scott, Paul, Frank, Steve, Justin, Clay,
Bobby Joe, Eric. I’m sure I’ve forgotten
a few. With all these folks doing what
has to be done, we’ll stop killing little kids around 1290. I’ll be long gone by then, so it‘s not my
responsibility.
Regina Dinwiddie writes from Colorado:
Dear Precious
Family, Please pray for Shelley
Shannon. Her dear sister, Roxy just passed away. Shelley is also very sick with
what sounds like the classic symptoms of Gall Bladder disease. I called Waseca
Correctional Facility, they were very abrupt and said that because of HIPPA
(confidentiality laws) they could not speak to me about Shelley's medical
condition. I said I know you can't speak to me about it, but I can speak to
you. I want you to make a note that I am a nurse and Shelley's friend of 24
years and I am concerned about her health. I know that this condition can be
very serious and she needs further help. Finally, they relented and will make a
note of it. Please pray she gets the medical attention that she needs. That she
will be sent out for tests and that the doctors and radiologists will be able
to see the problem and resolve it with minimal pain and suffering for Shelley
and speedily. "Answer me speedily.." Psalm 69:17.
Love Regina
-------------------------------------------
Will the New York
City radical elitists have their way. or will the good red-blooded
citizens of one of our great states have
theirs:
A federal appeals
court affirmed the last provision of a long-disputed informed consent law today,
ruling that the state of South Dakota can require abortionists to inform women
seeking to terminate the lives of their unborn baby that they face an increased
risk of suicide.
Attorney Harold
J. Cassidy called the decision of the full 8th Circuit Court of Appeals “a
fabulous victory for the women of the
state of South Dakota.”
Cassidy represents Leslee Unruh, president of the Alpha Center of Sioux Falls, and Stacy
Wollman, president of Care Net of Rapid City. They were allowed in intervene in
the case filed by Planned Parenthood against the state’s new law.
“This victory
represents the fourth separate decision of the 8th Circuit reversing the
district court in this one case, two decisions issued by en banc (full) courts
four years apart – a rare occurrence that underscores the importance of the
issues presented by the case,” said Cassidy.
“As a result of
this case upholding all eight major provisions of South Dakota’s Abortion
Informed Consent Statute, pregnant mothers will now be informed: 1) that ‘an
abortion terminates the life of a whole, separate, unique, living human being;’
2) that the mother’s ‘relationship with that second human being enjoys
protection under the Constitution of the United States and the laws of South
Dakota;’ 3) ‘that relationship and all rights attached to it will be
terminated;’ and 4) the abortion places the mother ‘at increased risk for
suicide ideation and suicide,’” he said.
The court’s opinion said even Planned Parenthood’s own
testimony documented a link between abortion and suicide.
To understand
Planned Parenthood’s agenda get “Marketing of Evil: How Radicals, Elitists, and
Pseudo Experts Sell Us Corruption Disguises as Freedom.”
Planned
Parenthood’s own expert, Dr. Nada Stotland, admitted that one of the studies,
which determined a suicide rate after abortion of 31.9 per 100,000 as compared
to a suicide rate after live birth of 5.0 per 100,000, ‘indicates an
association; not causation, but an association’ between abortion and suicide,”
the judges wrote.
Commenting on the
decision, Steven H. Aden of the Alliance Defending Freedom
said “a woman’s right to make a fully informed choice is more important than
Planned Parenthood’s bottom line.”
“If Planned
Parenthood truly cared about the well-being of women, it would not try to
prevent them from being informed of the well-documented risk of suicide that
accompanies abortion,” he said. “The 8th Circuit has done the right thing in
upholding a reasonable law that protects the well-being of women by making sure
that the truth is not hidden from them.”
The Sioux Falls
Alpha Center’s Unruh said the ruling “gives hope to the hopeless.”
“These are women
who had abortions who were coerced, persecuted, broken. These women did a very
courageous thing in going to the South Dakota legislature and telling their
stories,” she said. “These judges have believed them, listened to their hearts
and have ruled on their behalf.”
The lawsuit was
brought by Planned Parenthood against the state after the legislature in 2005
adopted the new informed consent requirements for abortionists.
Cassidy noted
that normally a statement of the importance of the decision would suffice.
“However, we feel that, in this instance, given the fact
that South Dakota’s Informed Consent Statute, passed to protect the interests
of pregnant mothers in South Dakota, was the subject of false claims and
protracted litigation that took seven years to conclude, and required the interveners
to win four different appeals in the Eighth Circuit, requires further comment,”
he said.
“Throughout the legislative processes, over the past
eight years, and all during the pending of this litigation, as well as that of
the new case now pending in the District Court (in which Alpha Center and Care
Net are party interveners), Planned Parenthood has threatened expensive
litigation and counsel fees. Planned Parenthood has argued that they should be
free to perform their radical abortion practices the way its New York City
office prefers and that the people of the state of South Dakota should not
impose regulations that reflect the values of the people of the state; and the
people should not protect the interests of their pregnant mothers.
“Planned
Parenthood has been proven completely wrong on every issue in the case. The
state statute is a constitutionally valid method to protect pregnant mothers,”
he said.
“The people of
the State of South Dakota have stood up to the threats, false accusations and
litigation tactics of Planned Parenthood. In the process, the people of South
Dakota have shown that they will not be intimidated by threats of litigation,
threats of payment of attorneys’ fees, and will hold fast to their conviction
that a handful of people in New York, with a radical philosophy, will not dictate
to the people of South Dakota, when, if, and how they will protect their women
from harm, pressure, coercion and false and incomplete information when making
the most important decision of their lives,” he said.
Another new law
adopted in South Dakota is subject to a second challenge by Planned Parenthood.
The law requires that a physician have a personal interview with a woman
seeking an abortion. The woman must be offered counseling by state-approved
counseling centers before the abortionist can schedule the procedure.
In South Dakota,
Planned Parenthood flies abortionists in to a facility where they perform
abortions. The law requires doubling the visits, because an abortionist could
not interview a woman and perform an abortion on her during the same trip.
The law also
requires that an abortionist determine whether the woman is being coerced into
the abortion and imposes a waiting period.
Several of the
requirements no longer are being challenged by Planned Parenthood, and they are
going into effect in the state. Remaining under challenge is the counseling
requirement along with the three-day waiting period.
The state
recently announced: “Pursuant to the 2011 and 2012 legislation and the order,
beginning July
1, 2012, doctors who perform abortions must assess each woman for
pre-existing risk factors such as coercion and must advise the woman about the
risk of adverse psychological outcomes.”
During the 2012
legislative session, South Dakotans amended several portions of the 2011
abortion law, and Planned Parenthood followed up with an amended complaint.
Planned Parenthood dropped its challenge to the provisions regarding coercion
and a risk-factor assessment but continued challenging requirements regarding
the referrals to the pregnancy help centers and the three-day delay.
As a result, the
two sides agreed to an order that the coercion and risk-factor assessment
provisions could go into effect right away.
“The remaining
challenged provisions – the requirement for involvement of the pregnancy help
centers and the three-day delay – will continue to be enjoined pending the
outcome of discovery, briefing and argument before the district court,” the
state’s announcement said.
According to a
statement by the Alpha Center of Sioux Falls and the Black Hills Pregnancy
Center of Rapid City, two abortion alternative centers to which women may be
referred, the decision from Judge Karen Schreier opens the door to substantial
new requirements for abortions.
“Planned
Parenthood can no longer have a clerk schedule abortion surgery – which has
been its practice – without a physician first seeing a pregnant mother,
compelling a change in the practices at the Planned Parenthood abortion
facility,” the statement said.
“Only a physician can schedule an abortion, and only
after the physician first performs an assessment, which includes an assessment
to determine if the pregnant mother is being pressured or coerced into having
an abortion. Until now, no such assessments were performed, and no physician
saw the pregnant mother until after the surgery was scheduled and only after
she was required to sign a consent for the abortion and only after she was
required to pay for the abortion,” the statement continued.
In today’s
decision over the 2005 law, the appeals court ruling said: “To succeed …
Planned Parenthood must show that the [suicide-abortion link] disclosure at
issue ‘is either untruthful, misleading or not relevant to the patient’s
decision to have an abortion.’”
“The legislature expressly required the
disclosure of an ‘increased risk,’ not a causal link. Based on the accepted
usage of the term ‘increased risk’ … the usage of that term … does not imply a
disclosure of a causal relationship,” the court said.
Instead, the section “requires a disclosure simply
that the risk of suicide and suicide ideation is higher among women who abort.”
The judges also said, “We hold that the
disclosure facially mandated by the suicide advisory is truthful.”
“The state legislature, rather than a federal
court, is in the best position to weigh the divergent results and come to a
conclusion about the best way to protect its populace. So long as the means
chosen by the state do not impose an unconstitutional burden on women seeking
abortions or their physicians, we have no basis to interfere,” the court said.
Kate Ranieri, a killers’ helper from Allentown, PA, posts an effective
prolife response to the above:
Kate I’m not really
clear why doctors need to tell women about the alleged harms of abortion (which
there are relatively few). We can thank the anti abortion minions for all the
work they do to tell women about affects of abortion (which are lies, of
course).
And if suicide is a potential side effect to
abortion, shouldn’t we expect the legislators to mandate that doctors warn
women of the very real potential for post partum depression, suicide homicidal
thoughts about killing or harming their children?
Me,
Goes right
into my newsletter. Let the killers’ helpers talk. No way this holocaust will
survive that.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To send money to the federal
Prisoners, those with eight digits after their names, make out a postal money
order to the Prisoner’s name and number.
Then send it to Federal Bureau of Prisons, PO Box 474701, Des Moines,
Iowa 50947-0001.
You can send a check directly to the others.
-------------------------------------------
Receipt of this excellent
missive notwithstanding, if you wish to be excluded from such blessings in the
future, simply advise me.
No comments:
Post a Comment