Monday, January 10, 2011

Abortion is Murder, 8-12, February, 2011

Formerly Stop the Killing of Young People (skyp) and soon, perhaps, Stop Killing Preemies

February, 2011 Vol. 8 No. 12
PO Box 7424, Reading, PA 19603
Phone – 484-706-4375
Email – johndunk@ptd.net
Web – skyp1.blogspot.com
Circulation – 103
John Dunkle, Editor

Abortion is Murder, a weak, pathetic response to baby murder, is sent out at least once a month. If the gestapo hasn’t jailed you for defending the innocent realistically, you either have to tell me you want it or go the website. Faxes and emails are free but snail-mail is free only for PFC’s, $10 for others.
Because I believe we should use every legitimate means, including force, in our attempt to protect those being tortured to death, I want to hear from people who’ve been forceful. I’d also like to hear from those who disagree with me.

Prisoners for Christ:

1. Evans, Paul Ross 83230-180, USP McCreary, P.O. Box 3000, Pine Knot, KY 42635
2. Gibbons, Linda - Vanier WDC, 655 Martin St., P.O. Box 1040, Milton, ON, Canada L9T 5E6
3. Griffin, Michael 310249, Okaloosa Correctional Institution, Crestview FL 32539-6708 9/11
4. Jordi, Stephen 70309-004, FCI P.O. Box 33, Terre Haute IN 47802 6/30
5. Knight, Peter CRN 158589, Port Philip Prison, P.O. Box 376, Laverton, Victoria, Australia
6. Kopp, James 11761-055, USP Canaan, P.O. Box 300, 3057 Easton Tpk., Waymart, PA 18472
7. Little, David SJRCC, 930 Old Black River Road, Saint John, NB E2J 4T3
8. Moose, Justin – Piedmont Regional Jail, PO Drawer 388, Farmville, VA 23901 (new)
9. Richardson, Alonzo Lee 12898-021, FCI Pollock Federal Correctional Institution, P.O. Box 4050, Pollock, LA 71467
10. Roeder, Scott P. 65192, PO Box 2, Lansing Kansas 66043 (new)
11. Ross, Michael, Custer County Jail, 1010 Main St., Miles City, Montana 59301
12. Rudolph, Eric 18282-058 US Pen. Max, Box 8500, Florence CO 81226-8500
13. Shannon, Rachelle 59755-065, FCI Waseca, Unit A, P.O. Box 1731, Waseca, MN 56093 3/31
14. Waagner, Clayton Lee 17258-039, United States Penitentiary, P.O. Box 1000, Lewisburg PA 17837 8/25


The Lord has asked people to make sacrifices related to opposing abortion which all but a handful have had too weak a heart to make. And they’ve looked for any pretense they could conjure up to claim that the sacrifice wasn’t required. They even deluded themselves, as people often do, into “believing” the pretense was real . . . When they get what they’ll get, they’ll fully deserve it. Peter Knight
------------------------------------------------

Forgetting Our Lady of Guadalupe?
By Matthew Hanley

From the cross, Jesus gave us his Mother as our own; the beloved disciple John, by the design of providence, was not to be her only son. On December 12, 1531, Our Lady of Guadalupe – the “merciful Mother of all mankind” as she identified herself – spoke in the tenderest of terms to another one of her sons, Juan Diego:

Hear and let it penetrate into your heart, my dear little son. Let nothing discourage you, nothing depress you. Let nothing alter your heart or your countenance. Also do not fear any illness or vexation, anxiety or pain. Am I not here who am your mother? Are you not under my shadow and protection? Am I not your fountain of life? Are you not in the folds of my mantle, in the crossing of my arms? . . .Is there anything else that you need?

One would be hard pressed to find more comforting words; they are positively riveting given their intimate connection with the miraculous image of Mary imprinted on Juan Diego’s tilma. How to explain, among many other things, the reflection, verified with modern technological equipment unavailable in earlier centuries, of Juan Diego (and others in the room when he unraveled his tilma) in the eyes of the Blessed Mother? And all beautifully depicted on coarse fabric that, unlike others of its kind, which last a couple decades at the very most, has not appreciably deteriorated in 479 years, despite over a century of exposure to the elements?
The extravagance of Mary’s reassuring words is magnified by the fact that they came the day after Juan Diego did not follow through with his promise to meet Mary again at the appointed time and place. He had spent that day tending to his gravely sick uncle. Knowing that he just went AWOL on the Queen of Heaven, though, he decided to take a shortcut to his destination the next day in order to avoid her. Haven’t we all, knowing our own shortcomings, or facing the hardships and counter-cultural demands that come with faith in Christ, taken shortcuts in one form or another? He was nonetheless greeted by Our Lady and heard these soothing words – even after she had explicitly told him earlier: “Do not forget me.”
Does this hold some significance today – as large numbers of people with at least some exposure to the Church are choosing to take other paths? Ex-Catholics, it is said, comprise the largest religious affiliation in our country today after Catholics themselves. For some, a painful personal experience led them away. For others, a particular doctrine is discomfiting. I’ve always wondered, though, what those consumed with the demand for women’s ordination, for example, make of the fact that Mary is exalted above all other creatures. L.A. is not the “City of the Angels” but of their Queen: Our Lady of the Angels. (Dude, you have to admit: that is mind-boggling!).
Many adopt a secular perspective chiefly to evade Catholicism’s moral code – even though peace depends on it; violating what’s stamped on the heart ensures disquietude that no amount of protest or self-styled spirituality can quell. Still others in the West today turn to the East (or some New Age amalgamation that leaves out the demanding asceticism and morality of Eastern religion, too) for the same reason, or simply because it is the in-thing to do, though some are also genuinely seeking meaning, truth, and spirituality. Even if the reasons ex-Catholics have for avoiding the Church do not quite resemble how Juan Diego sought to avoid Mary that one day – still, the Blessed Mother understands our humanity and stands ready to shower us with her maternal love.
While Yoga has been in vogue here in the affluent West, National Geographic reports that some Mexicans, particularly those surrounded by the plague of drug-cartel related violence and “the prospect of such a terrible death”, are turning “to death itself for protection”; the cult of La Santa Muerte (Holy Death) has, curiously, become the “guardian of the most defenseless and worst of sinners.”
Is not a certain forgetfulness – of Our Lady, of the Church – at work under such duress here as well? (There can be no doubt that vicious persecution, not just forgetfulness, officially characterized the Mexican government’s relations with the Church for much of the last century). Drugs today, Cardinal Ratzinger wrote, “point to an interior longing in man which breaks out in perverted form if it does not find its true satisfaction.” Such perversion comes full circle when this unholy image is held up as a means of coping with the chaotic fallout of drugs, which “reveal the vacuum in our society” in the first place.
Shortly after Our Lady’s appearance, the Aztec peoples of the region converted by the millions – and as a result, abandoned their practice of human sacrifice. How could we, with our state-sanctioned toleration of the taking of innocent human life in the womb, have forgotten about such basic injunctions? Our modern-day barbarity not only far exceeds in scale the Aztecs rituals; it has flourished in a culture that, unlike the Aztecs, was formed by Christian sensibility. Their gods ceased having power to make exacting claims upon human life; the idol of absolute individual autonomy – “choice” and the “right to privacy” – still demands its pound of flesh.
Our Lady said she came to give all her love and protection to the people, to hear their weeping, and “alleviate all their multiple sufferings.” There could scarcely be a more inviting and urgent message for an anxious, secular age – particularly one that has forgotten what matters most.
----------------------------------------------------------------

Conspiracy? By Judy L. Thomas The Kansas City Star

More than 18 months after a Wichita abortion doctor was gunned down in his church, a federal investigation into a possible conspiracy continues in Kansas City. Federal agents have questioned more people in the past few weeks, while a grand jury convened after the murder of George Tiller is still under way.
The focus, according to those who have been interviewed, still appears to be on a Bible study group that Tiller’s killer attended.
At the same time, abortion-rights advocates are concerned that a recent North Carolina case signals an escalation in the threat of clinic-related violence.
Tiller was shot to death in May 2009 in the foyer of his Wichita church while serving as an usher. Scott Roeder of Kansas City was convicted of first-degree murder and sentenced to life in prison with no chance of parole for 50 years. David Lloyd, a Warrensburg attorney who used to attend Roeder’s Bible study group, said an FBI agent called him at the end of November. “I think they’re just barking up the wrong tree,” Lloyd said. “None of us were involved in any kind of vast conspiracy or whatever it is they’re looking for.” In October, two of Roeder’s former roommates who were members of the Bible study group told The Kansas City Star that they and several other members had testified before the grand jury in late September. The questions they were asked, they said, focused on whether Roeder had acted alone. More of Roeder’s former associates say they have been contacted by authorities since then, including two additional members of the Bible study. The group met in members’ homes on Saturdays. Those attending described themselves as Messianic Jews who, unlike mainstream Jews, believe that Jesus was the Messiah. “They’ve interviewed me at least nine times,” said Roeder’s former roommate, who led the study sessions at their house and testified before the grand jury in September. He asked that his name not be disclosed for fear of repercussion. “There wasn’t any conspiracy within the Bible study group,” he said. “We were not part of this pro-life movement. We were never involved in that.” After Tiller’s death, the Department of Justice announced it was looking into possible federal charges against Roeder, including a violation of the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act, or FACE, which was signed into law in 1994 to prevent clinic violence. Federal investigators also said they were looking into whether anyone else played a role in Tiller’s death.
Abortion-rights advocates have been pressing the Justice Department to investigate the possible existence of a network of anti-abortion extremists involved in clinic-related violence, including the murder of Tiller. They point to the recent case of a North Carolina activist as a reason for concern. In November, Justin Carl Moose signed a plea bargain with federal prosecutors on charges of distributing information on manufacturing and using an explosive. According to court documents, Moose provided detailed information and instructions on explosives to a person he thought was going to bomb a North Carolina abortion clinic. That person actually was a confidential informant. Moose told the informant that he was a member of the Army of God, a name associated with an underground network of anti-abortion extremists.
“I have set up groups,” the informant said Moose told him. “I have trained people and this is not my first rodeo.”
Authorities said Moose also used his Facebook page to advocate violence against abortion clinics and their employees and posted instructions on how to make explosives. One Facebook post, according to court documents, said, “End abortion by any means necessary and at any cost. Save a life, shoot an abortionist.”
Soon after Moose was charged, Justice Department investigators showed up in Kansas City to conduct more interviews on the Roeder case. So far, none of Roeder’s supporters — many of whom vocally support the killing of abortion doctors as an act of justifiable homicide — have been subpoenaed by the grand jury.
The Justice Department has remained tight-lipped.
“Our investigation remains ongoing,” said spokeswoman Xochitl Hinojosa. She declined further comment.
This isn’t the first federal investigation into a possible conspiracy of abortion clinic violence. In 1994, then-Attorney General Janet Reno called for an investigation, and a federal grand jury in Alexandria, Va., subpoenaed abortion foes around the country.
The investigation focused on about three dozen activists who advocated killing abortion doctors, including several from the Kansas City area. Many of those who were subpoenaed by that grand jury are now supporters of Roeder. The grand jury disbanded in 1996 without finding evidence of a nationwide conspiracy.
Kathy Spillar, executive vice president of the Feminist Majority Foundation, said Moose’s case, along with other recent incidents, indicate that the situation is escalating.
“Moose is with the Army of God,” Spillar said. “You’ve got an intersection of Army of God elements purported to have been talking with other anti-abortion leaders, and this intensified targeting and stalking of doctors. It points to how critical this federal investigation is.” Roeder’s supporters, however, call the investigation a witch hunt and say there’s nothing to uncover.
“Despite the tremendous budget devoted to building any kind of case possible, and especially how rare it is that there is even an illegal action any more, (another grand jury) reminds me of Chicken Little with his warning that the sky is falling,” said Dave Leach, an Iowa anti-abortion activist and friend of Roeder.
The Rev. Donald Spitz, director of Pro-Life Virginia who operates the Army of God website, said he recently discussed the grand jury investigation with Roeder. “He assures me there’s nothing there,” Spitz said. “And I agree. I think Scott would know better than to involve others.”
Spitz said Roeder wasn’t like Moose in North Carolina, who had been publicly advocating abortion clinic violence. “We communicated a lot on Facebook,” Spitz said of Moose. “I was telling him, you don’t need to be posting that stuff on bombmaking. If people want that information, they can get it themselves. But evidently, he didn’t listen.”

Because I maintain publicly that you may defend yourself against someone who is trying to kill you, I myself have been accused of being part of ”this conspiracy,” not only by the government and the enemy but by “pro-lifers” as well. Here’s a section from the tabs I’m keeping on one of these folks:

Thursday, April 8, In that case, Mrs. Koestel, Kathy is using you the same way she has used others. It is clear to me now that she hired you to try to prevent me from responding to her latest attack, which appears on page 3 in the April issue of her newsletter:

WHAT EXACTLY IS THE "ARMY OF GOD"?
Several people have asked what or who is the "Army of God". According to Wikipedia, a free online encyclopedia, the "Army of God" (AOG) is a Christian terrorist anti-abortion organization that sanctions the use of force to combat abortion in the United States. AOG activity began around 1981. "The Army of God uses 'leaderless resistance' as its organizing principle..."
The AOG considers those who have killed or injured an abortionist and/or abortion providers, or used violence against an abortion facility to be heroes. Scott Roeder, who killed the late-term abortionist "Dr. George Tiller last May, is their latest "hero".
Locally, John Dunkle has affiliated himself with this group. He is listed on the AOG website and he has a similar statement of the use of force on his blog and in his newsletter. He also thinks these killers, such as Paul Hill, Jim Kopp, Clayton Waagner, Eric Rudolph and Scott Roeder are heroes. Thus the reason we have been warned to stay away from John and for John to stay away from the rest of us.
While we all deplore the great evil of abortion, most pro-lifers do not condone the use of force to stop it. We know the power of prayer is stronger than any gun or bomb. The slow change in public opinion to now favor life is due far more to changing hearts, one person at a time, than from the use of bullets.

So, respond I will (Mrs. Koestel, Kathy’s lawyer, had told me to have no contact with her whatsoever):

In paragraph 1 Kathy quotes Wikipedia -- the AOG is “a Christian terrorist anti-abortion organization.” That is pro-abortion propaganda. Kathy has spread pro-abortion propaganda before and it’s why I started to suspect that she is pro-abortion herself.
The truth is that many years ago someone distributed clandestinely a booklet with that name. The booklet described ways to break the laws that enable legal abortion (similar to Joe Scheidler’s Closed: 99 Ways to Stop Abortion). Pro-aborts jumped on the secrecy to claim that it was put out by a large and very dangerous group of pro-lifers. Someone the pro-aborts would consider dangerous, someone like Shelley Shannon or Eric Rudolph or James Kopp, comes along about once every five years. The existence of “a terrorist anti-abortion organization” is pure fiction.
Today The Army of God is the name of the Reverend Don Spitz’s website, and that’s all it is. The Rev. posts pictures of the bloody parts of babies that have been aborted, like the pictures Kathy herself displays. He also posts biographies and writings of most of the seventeen people who are incarcerated for having used force in our abortion war.
In paragraph 2 Kathy calls killers “abortion providers” and a killing mill an “abortion facility." Pro-aborts, not pro-lifers, talk that way. Her use of pro-abortion language is another reason I suspect her of being a pro-abort.
The second sentence in paragraph 3 is accurate. I do edit a newsletter written mostly by the jailed prolifers mentioned above, and I use The Army of God website to find out who’s in prison, who’s out, and where the transfers are. The other three sentences are inaccurate: sentence 1 – there is no group; sentence 3 – Clayton Waagner did not kill anyone. (Moreover, thirteen of the seventeen incarcerated prolifers did not kill anyone either. See how Kathy twists the truth?); sentence 4 -- I have not been told to stay away from anybody other than Kathy, and I don’t know of anyone except her who’s been told to stay away from me.
Paragraph 4 is one response to thirty-seven years, and counting, of legally killing each year over a million innocents, but I think it is a woefully weak response. I’ll talk more about that later.
--------------------------------

“Can anything good come out of Nazareth?” John 1:46

Many of us over 50 feel like aliens in the land of our birth. We have been conquered from within. The Christian mores which were the bedrock of civilization are forsaken. Sodomy, fornication, adultery, and aborticide are normalized and considered as American as apple pie and Chevrolet!
Social upheaval begins with humanizing God and deifying man. We reject God so we might reject God’s law. “Science” is become a god word, while God’s word is mocked as a myth.
Scientific theory is inferior to theology because it denies the existence of the Creator. Scientific theory substitutes the theory of Evolution for God’s revelation declared in His word. The fine instruments which help us study the cosmos and micro cosmos are useless to dogs, pigs, and blind ignorant savages.
Worldly Christians accept whatever the world accepts. A cultural Christian accepts whatever the culture accepts. A biblical Christian’s opinions are shaped and honed by the bible. Cultural Christian’s opinions are shaped by popular mainstream media. Cultural Christians want to fit in; their biggest fear is to be radically different from the people around them. Most American churches breed “cultural Christians.” Cultural Christians, rather than seeking God’s will for their lives, make Jesus Christ into their image, after their likeness. “What would Cheeses do?” they ask. Their Cheeses loves everybody and goes along to get along. Have you hugged a sodomite today? Cheeses is their smiling teddy bear in the sky wishing everybody a nice day and a fine time. Cultural Christians have women, sodomite, and lesbian “pastors” praying for God to bless their wicked enterprises and ungodly lifestyles, while sheltering and healing them from the consequences of their sin.
We should not be surprised that the pro-life movement is made up of cultural Christians. They are not so different from their pro-abortion counterparts. We should call them “lame duck pro-lifers” (LDPs) because they give lame arguments about “fetal pain” while ducking the real issue of rank murder. LDP’s oppose personhood efforts in several states. “The culture isn’t ready for this!” they complain. Lame duck pro-lifers prefer the aborting mom over the womb child. They quibble over rules, regulations, proper methods, procedures, and timing of baby-murder. They disavow civil disobedience to protect baby, and frown upon graphic displays of aborticide. After years of pouting and whining, some LDP’s have come around to accepting graphic displays only because they are so widely used and recognized as effective in saving lives. Most LDP’s are too fearful to use graphic signs. They are afraid of offending someone. The opposite of offense is defense. Lame Duck Pro-lifers have been waging a losing 38 year old defensive war.

America is doomed; she is in her death throes.
• We should not fight to preserve a military which is led by lesbian and sodomite officers.
• We shall not fight alongside lame duck pro-lifers over the proper etiquette of child sacrifice.
• We should not try to resuscitate a depraved school system which lacks common sense.
• We should not revive the American dream of a godless Bohemian lifestyle and perpetual adolescence.
• We do not support government which permits, protects, and promotes with our tax dollars the wanton killing of human beings here and abroad.
• We cannot support America’s endless wars and wasteful spending sprees. A body politic which “eats out our substance, and corrupts our manner.” Much more could be said.

We have seemingly lost the fight for the soul of our nation. It has been handed over to the devil for further torment. Though our efforts seem futile we shall continue to fight for a lack of anything better to do. We shall warn, rebuke, and continue in hope of plucking a few brands from the fire as we patiently await our Master’s return. dan holman
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hello, folks, Over the years I have kept in contact, off and on, with Michael Griffin. Right from the beginning, when I first began to correspond with him in 1994, I avoided any discussion with him of the use of force in the defense of preborn children, as it was my understanding that Mr. Griffin had strongly repudiated his own act of killing the abortionist David Gunn. It was my object to serve him, not to argue with him or attempt to change his mind about anything.
In his Christmas card to me this year, Mr. Griffin mentioned that he had given an interview to 60 minutes,* and sent me the URL so that I could find the transcript of the broadcast on the internet. (See the URL and the text below.)
It was quite a surprise to me! If these borts who produced this program have quoted Mr. Griffin correctly, he now no longer repudiates his killing of the abortionist Gunn! This came as total news to me, and a bit of a shock actually. I really don't know what the facts are, if Mr. Griffin has changed his view and now believes his killing of Gunn was a righteous act, or if he always believed it was righteous, or what. I do hope, if the Lord be willing, to send Mr. Griffin a copy of the transcript, in case he does not already have access to one, so that he can have the opportunity to make corrections, should he believe that the program misrepresented his views in any respect.
If I get any further info on this, I'll try to send that to you as well. If you yourself can shed any light on it, beyond what I have written here, I'd be grateful to hear from you. Also, please feel free to forward this to anyone if you think it might be something that he or she might benefit from reading.
Just a note, Mr. Griffin has written to me that he has been exercising and taking care of his health for several years now, much more than he did when younger. It's nice to see him looking so well in the photo that accompanies the story below.
May God bless you, David Rydholm
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

The cross is near extinction in the ancient lands of its origin By Jeffrey T. Kuhner

An Iraqi policeman stands guard at the scene of a car bomb attack in front of a Syrian Catholic Church, in Baghdad, Iraq, Monday Nov. 1, 2010. Islamic militants held around 120 Iraqi Christians hostage for nearly four hours in a church Sunday before security forces stormed the building and freed them, ending a standoff that left dozens of people dead, U.S. and Iraqi officials said. (AP Photo/Khalid Mohammed)
As Americans celebrate Christmas in peace in our nation, many Christians across the Middle East are in peril: Muslim fanatics seek to exterminate them.
Over the past several years, Christians have endured bombings, murders, assassinations, torture, imprisonment and expulsions. These anti-Christian pogroms culminated recently with the brutal attack on Our Lady of Salvation, an Assyrian Catholic church in Baghdad. Al Qaeda gunmen stormed the church during Mass, slaughtering 51 worshippers and two priests. Father Wassim Sabih begged the jihadists to spare the lives of his parishioners. They executed him and then launched their campaign of mass murder.
Their goal was to inflict terror - thereby causing chaos in the hopes of undermining Iraq's fledgling democracy - and to annihilate the country's Christian minority. After the siege, al Qaeda in Mesopotamia issued a bulletin claiming that "all Christian centers, organizations and institutions, leaders and followers, are legitimate targets for" jihadists.

Since the 2003 war in Iraq, Christians have faced a relentless assault from Islamic extremists. Many of these groups, such as the Assyrians, consist of the oldest Christian sects in the world, going back to the time of Christ. Some even speak Aramaic, the language used by Jesus. The very roots of our Christian heritage are being extirpated.
Religious cleansing is taking place everywhere in Iraq - by Shiites, Sunnis and Kurds. Before the toppling of Saddam Hussein, there existed more than 1 million Christians in Iraq. They are now mostly gone - scattered to the winds, sacrificed on the altar of erecting an Islamic state. Churches have been closed or blown up. Hundreds of thousands have been expelled. Nearly two-thirds of the 500,000 Christians in Baghdad have fled or been killed. In Mosul, about 100,000 Christians used to live there. Now, just 5,000 remain. Soon there will be none.
The rise of radical Islam threatens Christian communities not only in Iraq, but across the Middle East. In Egypt, Coptic Christians routinely are murdered, persecuted and prevented from worshipping - especially during religious holy days such as Christmas and Easter. In the birthplace of Christ, Bethlehem, Christians have largely been forced out. In Nazareth, they are a tiny remnant. In Saudi Arabia, Muslim converts to Christianity are executed. Churches and synagogues are prohibited. In Turkey, Islamists have butchered priests and nuns. In Lebanon, Christians have dwindled to a sectarian rump, menaced by surging Shiite and Sunni populations.
The Vatican estimates that from Egypt to Iran there are just 17 million Christians left. Christianity is on the verge of extinction in the ancient lands of its birth. In short, a creeping religious genocide is taking place.
Yet the West remains silent for fear of offending Muslim sensibilities. This must stop - immediately. For years, Pope Benedict XVI has been demanding that Islamic religious leaders adopt a new policy: reciprocity. If Muslims - funded and supported by Saudi Arabia - can build mosques and madrassas in Europe and America, then Christians - Catholics, Protestants and Orthodox - should be entitled to build churches in the Arab world. For all of their promises, however, Muslim leaders have failed to deliver. In fact, the situation has only deteriorated.
Clearly, some Muslims cannot live in peaceful coexistence with non-Muslim peoples - especially in countries where Muslims form the majority. Christian minorities living in the overwhelmingly Muslim-dominated Middle East pose no possible danger to Islamic hegemony. Hence, why the hatred against them?
This is a repeat of an old historical pattern: the periodic ebb and flow of Islamic jihadism. From its inception, Islam has been engaged in a struggle with Christian civilization. Led by the Prophet Muhammad some 600 years after the birth of Christ, the Muslim faith spread across the Middle East through violence and war. Christians were either forcibly converted or slowly expelled from their ancestral lands. Following the conquest of the Arabian Peninsula, Muslim armies invaded North Africa, Spain, France and the Balkans. At one point, they even reached the gates of Vienna - until they were repelled by the brave knights of Catholic Croatia. The sword of Islam sought to conquer Christian Europe.
Bernard Lewis, the foremost historian on the Middle East, rightly argues that the Crusades were not the result of Western imperialism; rather, they signified a belated - and only partially successful - effort to liberate once-Christian territories from Islamic aggression. Europe was saved; Jerusalem and the Middle East were not.
Today's anti-Christian pogroms are not new. They are what Christians have historically faced - persecution, death and martyrdom. In Roman times, Christians were thrown to the lions in the Coliseum. In the Islamic world, they are being murdered, raped, beheaded and thrown out of their homes. The only difference is the means, not the end.
The Christians of the Middle East are dying for their convictions, as did so many others before them. For this, they will receive their just reward in heaven. Their deaths are a salient reminder that, contrary to liberal myth, Islam is not a "religion of peace." Instead, it contains a militant segment bent on waging a holy war against infidels and erecting a global caliphate.
There is, however, a true religion of peace. It began with a baby boy born in a manger in Bethlehem. Jesus, the Prince of Peace, came to shine a light into the dark souls of men. As Christians recall and celebrate that humble birth, we also should stand in solidarity with those who are, 2,000 years later, still being persecuted in His name.

Dr. Frank comments: It states, "radical" Islam, when in reality it should be just plain "Islam" that's killing Christians. They all read from the same Koran and the message they get from this unholy book is to kill all the infidels if they do not convert to Islam.
I am sick and tired of hearing that it's not all Muslims who are terrorist, that it's just the radicals. This is bull-crap. There should be no compartmentalization. If some take from the Koran that they should kill Christians then the Koran is an evil book, period, and all people of the Islam faith are guilty and to blame for the killing of Christians throughout the world as well as the attack on the Twin Towers that killed about 3,000 people.
IF THERE WOULD BE NO ISLAM RELIGION THESE PEOPLE WOULD STILL BE ALIVE AND CHRISTIANS AROUND THE WORLD WOULD NOT BE KILLED. THIS IS IRREFUTABLE. Frank Joseph M.D.

I comment: Why do Catholics and Jews, but not Muslims, kill their children? (That’s the sign I place every Tuesday morning outside Planned Parenthood here in Reading.)
--------------------------------------------
-----------------------------

Hello John, I decided to post a copy of those two recent letters I sent to you to someone else. Rather than get a photocopy of the two of them and send it in that haphazard and hashed up form, I decided to write the thing again and combine the two. The temptation was there to change a couple of things and add a bit more and I succumbed to it, mainly just toward the end, about the last three quarters of a page. I’ve sent you a photocopy of it. If you do print this, the better thing to do is to use it rather than the others. This that I’m writing now is on the reverse side of the last page of it.
It’s quite a while since I’ve done so, but I happened to read the introduction to your newsletter in the last issue. I noticed the $100 price tag you’ve got listed for post office delivery. By gee that’s steep, 7 or 8 dollars an issue. I can’t imagine you get many poor people placing orders at that price. For that matter, I can’t imagine you getting orders from anyone at that price. I seem to recall a time, maybe 4 or 5 years ago, when I saw a $6 per annum price tag there. Maybe you’re trying to deter mail orders though. You’ve certainly gone the right way about it if you are. I know it would take at least a couple of hours and probably more to publish each issue, but if I wanted people to read something, I don’t think I’d be charging a dollar a page for mail delivery.
There are still plenty of people around who don’t have a computer and can’t afford a hundred dollars. I’ll likely be one of them when I leave prison next year. When that issue comes out that has a hundred million prospective mail order readers, you are going to miss out on a lot of business at $100. With a hundred million prospective mail order readers it still can’t be imagined that any more than a handful are going to be keen enough to shell out $100. I’d be lowering the price way down and hoping to get most of those hundred million to order, even if it meant hiring a mail handler or two or three.
I don’t know how much Eric Rudolph got paid for writing his book. I suppose probably nothing. Probably just put in the long hours hoping someone would benefit from it.

I took a couple zeros off that price tag. Here’s the start of Peter’s article:

Dear John, “Meanwhile, if you think Peter is on to something, two courses of action remain. One of them illegal. Since for me, doing anything illegal is not an option, I have only one.”

That quote I’ve just given is from the November AIM and it’s your reply to what I said in my previous letter. The number one question here, John, is this: Has this devotion of yours to the government and its corrupt laws come at a cost, a high cost, an incredibly high cost, at the cost of throwing God’s law into the rubbish bin after you’ve defecated on it, or do people who claim to be Christian find that having a shit on God’s law is an acceptable cost for the “privilege” of paying homage to pro murder politicians and judges? That’s a very easy question, so you should have no troubles coming up with the answer.

Whether you and your many fellow government worshippers considered it to be a high cost at all when the government demands that you defecate on God’s law, it’s perfectly clear that you didn’t consider it to be an unacceptable cost. Because you’ve done it. And done it repeatedly just so many times. It’s also perfectly clear that the millions of lives lost as a result of your devotion to the government were not considered an unacceptable cost either.
God’s law in Matthew 7:12 demands, as you would only ever expect from God, that his people do for others what they would want others to do for them. That’s a great law. It’s no wonder it’s called The Golden Rule. As with all his laws, this great law was given for us by God for the purpose of bringing about justice.
That’s not what the government sees as the purpose of God’s Golden Rule though. As you would only ever expect from completely corrupt people, the government views God’s Golden Rule as having been given to us by God so they could “prove” their “superiority” by getting you to have a shit on it each and every day of your life at their request. The government and their laws demand that you do not do for God’s persecuted unborn children what you would want others to do for you if a murderer was about to take your head off.
Specifically, what does the government demand of you? The government demands that you allow there to be abortionists. Since whilst ever there are abortionists, there will be deaths for their victims; by demanding that you allow there to be abortionists, the government also demands that you submit and allow there to be death for their victims. How easy is that to see?

Although this is not as long as Peter’s previous letter, it’s only the first page of eight. Hang in there. I will.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

31 comments:

John Dunkle said...

1/10 nots

"...it seems every day there is an anti-choice person accusing a pro-choice person of being a Nazi, of 'genocide,' or worse, if there is anything worse than genocide..." There might be nothing worse than genocide, jane, but one instance can be worse than another. Just compare the six million Jews killed by the Germans to the sixty million preborn killed by us (and maybe six million more Jews among them).

John Dunkle said...

1/11 nots

Live with it. Those of us who know that we are torturing to death thousands of people a week will say that. Those of us who deny that will call it hate speech.

John Dunkle said...

1/12 nots

I usually save my comments on skyp1.blogspot.com. I forgot to, though, here. It went something like this: the liars call us liars, and the killers call us killers. Paltrow, one of the most egregious proponents of killing the innocent who's ever lived, accuses Sarah Palin of inciting violence. Satan has to be the one who speaks through the voices of those who defend the killing of the young. People themselves are simply not capable of such depravity -- until they die.

John Dunkle said...

1/11 eers

the worst product of a hack writer

John Dunkle said...

1/12 nots

I have heard people call Clinton the first black president!

John Dunkle said...

1/12 eers

You run this video every year and you never post the straight answer I send you: Of course penalties should be attached,lesser ones for the desperadoes like some pregnant women and all drug addicts, greater ones for the baby killers and the drug sellers. Why does this guy act as if he is asking "the great question"?

John Dunkle said...

1/12 eers

Dizzy, did it ever occur to you that your problem started here: "Even when I was in a long-term relationship"?

John Dunkle said...

1/13 nots

But I will will add “you don’t want to go in there because it smells like blood and death” right under "mom, don't let him pull off my arms and legs," on the list you've gathered for us. So maybe it is one of your good ones. (And what is it about that lady, Kate, that drives you so crazy? I can't think of anything else but jealousy.)

John Dunkle said...

1/14 nots

You don't mean paradoxes, Kate. You mean dichotomies.

John Dunkle said...

1/15 nots

Catholic anti-Catholics form the largest faith-based group in the USA. That's where you and Jimmy are, isn't it?

John Dunkle said...

1/15 nots

three strikes -- long, boring, and deceitful

John Dunkle said...

1/15 nots

John Dunkle said...

1/16 nots

three strikes -- long, boring, and deceitful

John Dunkle said...

1/16 nots

Your videos, Kate, actually make us look good. At the last minute, you kind of recognized that. So you stuck in those first two pictures.
Back in the '80s, during the first "rescue" I saw, killers' helper Bill Baird and his group climbed the fence the cops had used to encircle the rescuers. The TV stations and the print media on Long Island ran pictures of that next day to "show" that the sitting and peaceful rescuers had, as you say above, "nothing peaceful about them." Finally, on this small stage, I can expose y'all.

John Dunkle said...

same

Now here's a paradox: "pro-life" Kathy Kuhns posts videos that make us look bad and "pro-death" Kate Ranieri posts videos that make us look good. (Could they BOTH be undercover agents?)

John Dunkle said...

1/17 eers

I count a dozen contributors to this blog, and you haven't been able to come up with anything new since Thursday. Kate Ranieri at thenotsodailyherald is all by herself and she comes up with two or three things every day! They might be stupider than your posts (if that's possible) but come on, get off your butts!

Ask yourselves this too: Why have I been able to find three powerful poems about the horror of killing young people (I read them Saturday mornings in Allentown) but none about the advantages of doing so? Ask yourselves why you and your sisters are all anger, vindictiveness, and sterility? Where's the poetry?


!

John Dunkle said...

1/17 nots

Kate, compare this -- "the authors cite statistics that dispute some...who believe women choose abortion because...of economics" to this -- "that she could not afford a baby now (73%)"! Do you peruse the stuff you post?

John Dunkle said...

1/17 eers

"work to reduce stigma against both abortion and pregnancy" -- you live in a dream world, ps. People who stigmatize abortion love life; people who stigmatize pregnancy love death. And never the two shall meet.

John Dunkle said...

1/18 nots

Kate, compare this — “the authors cite statistics that dispute some…who believe women choose abortion because…of economics” to this — “that she could not afford a baby now (73%)”! Do you peruse the stuff you post?

What’s wrong with what I said above? Why haven’t you erased it yet?

John Dunkle said...

1/18 nots

Kate, compare this — “the authors cite statistics that dispute some…who believe women choose abortion because…of economics” to this — “that she could not afford a baby now (73%)”! Do you peruse the stuff you post?

What’s wrong with what I said above? Why haven’t you erased it yet?

John Dunkle said...

1/18 nots

Kate, compare this — “the authors cite statistics that dispute some…who believe women choose abortion because…of economics” to this — “that she could not afford a baby now (73%)”! Do you peruse the stuff you post?

What’s wrong with what I said above? Why haven’t you erased it yet?

John Dunkle said...

1/17 nots

Not just you, Kate, but so many other killers' helpers accuse me of cherry picking when I underline what you write. You try to hide what you say by burying it amid vituperation and other nonsense. When I expose you, you freak out. Others like you are Chuckles, Rog, Sonia, and a hundred odd high schoolers who have more serious problems, all from the abortion.ws blog. Get over it, all right? You have a decent model over there, Pat. Pat rarely screams and excoriates and is therefore so much more effective.

John Dunkle said...

1/19 nots

"If you want to know why some people have such strong feelings against catholics, take another look at this latest report." You've got it backwards, Kate. Some people are anti-Catholics. They are ever alert to the "latest report" that confirms their feelings. These "latest reports" are invariably supercilious. They are easily dismissed, but that doesn't stop other "latest reports" from soon replacing them.
The more interesting point is what caused the anti-Catholicism in the first place. Let's start that discussion with yourself (if you've got the guts).

John Dunkle said...

I didn't ask you to expand on the anti-Catholicism; I asked you to examine why you yourself are an anti-Catholic.

John Dunkle said...

1/19 eers

I'm with you VV, anything to make you look ridiculous.

John Dunkle said...

1/20 eers

Just AboutAGirl dreaming again. Bill Gates? Warren Buffet?? Satan???

John Dunkle said...

1/20 nots

It's tomorrow, dupes.

John Dunkle said...

1/22 nots

"...their own agendas..." -- love it

John Dunkle said...

1/25 nots

“I am not implying that the cases are equivalent. ” A tiny spark can lead to the light.

John Dunkle said...

1/25 nots

They are all grisly houses of horror, Kate. Ed Rendell and his wife are the reasons they are particularly grisly in Pennsylvania. This thug did more for the baby-killing industry even than Clinton or Obama. If you ran one of these mills here, you could be sure that no one would ever bother you no matter what you did. First as chief cop, then as mayor of Philly, then as governor, Rendell promoted baby killing, with his wife leading him with a nose ring.

John Dunkle said...

1/25 nots

Just finished PZ Myers standard anti-Catholic diatribe: sexual relations with children and other animals are just fine; families suck; societies, other than ours yet, are queer; history began in 1397 (and so did your life when that became your cell count); etc.; etc. When ya gonna get over this, Kate?