Abortin is Murder August, 2009, Vol.7, No. 4

Formerly Stop the Killing of Young People (skyp) and soon, perhaps, Stop Killing Preemies

August, 2009, Vol. 7, No. 4
PO Box 7424, Reading, PA 19603
Phone – cell--484-706-4375 (new), machine -- 610-396-0332
Email – johndunk@ptd.net
Web – skyp1.blogspot.com
Circulation – 33`
John Dunkle, Editor

Abortion is Murder, a weak, pathetic response to baby murder, is sent out at least once a month. If the gestapo hasn’t jailed you for defending the innocent realistically, you either have to tell me you want it or go the website. Faxes and emails are free but snail-mail is free only for POC’s, $100 for others.
Because I believe we should use every legitimate means, including force (although “Dear Mr. Dunkle” has me thinking), in our attempt to protect those being tortured to death, I want to hear from people who’ve been forceful. I’d also like to hear from those who disagree with me.

Prisoners of Christ:
1. Evans, Paul Ross 83230-180, USP McCreary, P.O. Box 3000, Pine Knot, KY 42635
2. Gibbons, Linda - Vanier WDC, 655 Martin St. , P.O. Box 1040, Milton, ON, Canada L9T 5E6
3. Griffin, Michael 310249, Okaloosa Correctional Institution, Crestview FL 32539-6708 9/11
4. Howard, Peter Andrew 57760-097, FCI, Box 900, Safford, AZ 85546
5. Jordi, Stephen 70309-004, FCI P.O. Box 33, Terre Haute IN 47802 6/30
6. Knight, Peter CRN 158589, Port Philip Prison, P.O. Box 376, Laverton, Victoria, Australia
7. Kopp, James 11761-055, USP Canaan, 3057 Easton Tpk., Waymart, PA 18472
8. McMenemy, David Robert 08168-030, FCI Elkton, P.O. Box 10, Lisbon OH 44432
9. Roeder, Scott, Sedgwick County Jail, 141 West Elm, Wichita, KS 67203
11. Rudolph, Eric 18282-058 US Pen. Max, Box 8500, Florence CO 81226-8500
12. Shannon, Rachelle 59755-065, FCI Dublin Unit A, 5701 8th St., Camp Parks, Dublin CA 94568 3/31
13. Waagner, Clayton Lee 17258-039, United States Penitentiary, P.O. Box 1000,

14. Weiler Jr., Robert F. 39385-037, FCC - Delaware Hall, Box 1000, Petersburg VA 23804 (new)
15. Whitaker, Vincent , FCI, Box 699, Estill SC 29918

The Lord has asked people to make sacrifices related to opposing abortion which all but a handful have had too weak a heart to make. And they’ve looked for any pretense they could conjure up to claim that the sacrifice wasn’t required. They even deluded themselves, as people often do, into “believing” the pretense was real . . . When they get what they’ll get, they’ll fully deserve it. Peter Knight

Dear Mr. Dunkle, I’ve been reading “Abortion is Murder” for several years now. I watch you go back and forth on this question: May one use force to defend the victims in this holocaust? I don’t think so.
The reason we God-fearing folk should not defend young people by attacking their killers comes from the Old Testament. Unbelievers then were eliminated regularly by the Godly, at Yahweh’s command. Just read, as one example, what Moses ordered the sons of Levi to do to heretics, those who were worshiping the golden calf, and then look what he ordered done to pagan Midianites! He ordered all of them killed -- old people, young people, men, and women.
Today, we do not have to kill heretics and pagans because the abortionist does that. Every woman who walks into a killing place has turned away from God. And the young person she is carrying would grow up to be just like her. Thus does the abortionist now kill those whom, earlier, Believers were ordered to kill. (Abortionists are also eliminating many of the killing women themselves as they are three-and-a-half times more likely to die during the following year than women who carry to term.) Therefore, we must not kill baby killers. They are doing what The Chosen People did.
What, then, should we do? First we must try to stop the woman who intends to carry the child into the mill. We must try to turn this woman towards God. Moreover, if she does turn towards God, the boy or girl she is carrying will become her believing son or daughter. Beyond that, we must try to persuade others as well to turn towards God so that the law of the land reflects the will of God, not Satan.
Since your newsletter is written for those who by their actions disagree with the above, I expect some response. God bless the Godly, especially those who are not all-talk, like you and me. Jacob Koch
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Paul Ross Evans’ story continues:

I had business to attend to fifteen miles away in a neighboring town, and I placed the bomb on the passenger's seat and departed. After I had attended the meeting planned for that morning, I drove to the post office and bought a book of stamps. The post office was very crowded, and I needed privacy to arm the explosive and seal the box. There was a gas station across the street, so I drove over to it.
I noticed that the stamps were the sort that need to be moistened before sticking to a surface. I was not about to lick them and leave my DNA on them, not after I had taken such care to wear gloves during construction of the bomb, and to keep the box free of any hair or fibers. So, I went into the gas station and bought a bottle of water. I held the stamps outside of the (ajar) car door, and poured the bottled water over the back of them. Finally, I was able to attach them to the box. I armed the bomb while sitting in the car, using the safe/arm switch, and sealed the box using a large amount of packing tape, while wearing gloves. I then wiped the outside of the package down one more time, to make sure that I hadn't accidentally left any partial fingerprints.

I drove back across the street to the post office, and put on a hooded sweatshirt. Lowering the sleeves to cover my fingers, I picked up the box with an awkward grip and marched into the post office. I mailed the bomb in a drop box and left.
In the following weeks I paid close attention to the media, via the Internet, especially in the San Francisco area.
As I had mailed the package, I had noticed a sign on the drop box which said that packages weighing more than a certain amount could only be mailed in person at a postal counter. I hadn't done that, obviously. I knew that the package would be delivered anyway. I had used an excessive amount of postage. But no news came from the west coast about the bombing. It was as if nothing had ever happened. I became frustrated by the silence, and so I continued to learn more about explosives by reading. I already had a fully functioning hit list. I knew that I could learn from any mistakes in my bombings by monitoring the media. Through trial and error, through hit and miss, eventually I would kill. Whenever I had time alone, I spent it researching future targets and learning more about bomb making.
During this time, I located permanent employment and new housing. I also made some bomb-making purchases, and acquired more chemicals and equipment.
At this time I composed two threatening letters. I sent one to an abortionist in Beverly Hills, an Abraham something-or-other, who murdered children for a living. I told him that he was an easy target, and that, just as easily as he had opened the letter, in security, I could have blown him up with an improvised explosive device. I told him that "The Right" would no longer tolerate such filth in society, and to "watch out." I sent another threatening letter to a pornographer in California, one Robert Zicari, who was in hot water because his pornography company had been distributing videos depicting pseudo-rapes and extreme sadism. I made both letters extremely intimidating, threatening their lives with mail bombs and mocking the smugness they operated in. "Look how easily I could have killed you, moron," I wrote to them.
One day, as I was walking downtown near the capitol building in Austin, smoking cigarettes and drinking espressos, I stumbled upon a tangled ball of human hair of all colors. I picked it up and put it inside the cellophane wrapper of my cigarettes. I included bits of this hair in the letters in order to "throw off" agents working for the regime in Washington.
A few weeks later, I found out about Michael Newdow. Mr. Newdow is an atheist in California who has continued to pester and threaten Christendom in many ways, ranging from objecting to Christian evangelist Franklin Graham giving the invocation at
President Bush's 2001 inauguration, to being plaintiff in a lawsuit to remove the words "under God" from the Pledge of Allegiance (Elk Grove Unified School District v. Newdow, which was eventually heard before the U. S. Supreme Court in June, 2004, and dismissed on procedural grounds). I felt that Mr. Newdow was an extremely important target, not only because of what he did, but also because of the arrogance in which he operated. But the more research I did on him, the more I learned about his personal life, and his daily activities. He had children who were often with him. I could not risk hurting his children, so I chose to intimidate and shake him up a little bit by mailing him an inactive bomb.
I assembled the components, leaving out the essential piece — the power source — and secured it all inside of another cardboard mailing box. I also included a bag of pure potassium chlorate, which is primarily used as a component in bombs and pyrotechnical devices, and is not exactly something that one can purchase just anywhere. I did so to send a message to FBI and ATF agents that I knew what I was doing, that I could have killed Mr. Newdow, but had chosen not to.
As it happened, Mr. Newdow opened the package at a post office in California, in the presence of his daughter. The bomb squad was called, the post office was shut down for a time, trepidation caused, end of story, mission accomplished.
No one was hurt.
On that package, I believe the return address I used was that of a pornographic distributor in California, but truly I never expected the package to be opened by anyone other than Mr. Newdow. I knew that in his arrogance he would march right into the post office, and never suspect that someone might object to his actions. And that is what he did. This arrogance of his was the very thing I targeted. I aimed to strike out at the confidence in which these enemies operate; they never expect pacifist and plastic Christians to raise an objection. They are horribly mistaken about a certain segment of the Christian Right, however.
I hope that some of this man's smugness was altered. I believe that Mr. Newdow is simply a sad product of the confidence that this nation has generated publicly for years, encouraging society to act "any old way." Meanwhile, law enforcement officers are baffled as to why urban areas are overrun with drug use and violence.
But if Michael Newdow had not been a father, my bomb would have killed him that day. He knows this, and so do I. His daughter's presence saved his life, and he can thank her for that one day. He would have been eliminated that day, no question.
Meanwhile, back in Austin, I didn't know what had happened with this bomb, or any of them, for that matter. There was no mention of it in the news. The liberal media machine in California had silenced it. As weeks passed, I grew somewhat impatient.
I located two Satanists at this point. My primary target was a man named Bob Ferguson (aka Bob McDonald). This fellow circulated literature instructing people as to how to raise children to be Satan worshippers. I also found information on the Internet about another Satanist (there is a superabundance of them) who was just as guilty as Ferguson of crimes against Christianity.
I created another mail bomb, using the same type of cardboard box and the same type of loop switch detonator. I had recently made an online purchase of some high quality pyrotechnic oxidizers. I had also begun to experiment with using light switches as detonators. I built most of this bomb while sitting in my car in a grocery store parking lot in downtown Austin, on the corner of Oltorf Street and South Congress Avenue. I drove up South Congress to the post office next to McDonald's, bought a book of stamps, and mailed the device to the Satanist. I found it rather amusing at the time that when I purchased the book of stamps from a machine inside the post office, the machine malfunctioned and gave me two books of stamps, one for free.
It was late March, and still I monitored the media. Nothing.
Weeks went by, and as April 19th approached, I planned a bombing to commemorate this notorious date of expression of dissatisfaction against the government of the United States. (Editor note: Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols bombed the Alfred P. Murray Federal Building in Oklahoma City on April 19, 1995.)
I wanted to target a sex shop located in downtown Austin. I chose "Sinsations," on South First Street, because of its name, and because it encouraged and profited from sexual promiscuity and perversion, marital infidelity, child molestation, murder, and rape. It also encouraged the degradation of women in many forms.
I was getting bolder in my forceful actions. The bombing at Sinsations was really simply an experiment. I was all alone in my endeavors, with little or no money. I used improvisation in the construction of each device. Each one cost about $100, and propellants and shrapnel were used in each one.
This was the first time I had made a timed detonator. I fashioned it from an alarm clock. The bomb itself was massive. I drove up to the car wash next door to Sinsations at sunset. I had been driving around the area for weeks. Wearing a hooded sweatshirt, I placed the bomb in a trash container outside the side door of the store. I had a feeling that some of the wiring had torn loose when I left it, because the trash can was empty when I placed the bomb in it. I waited for a while, and thought about setting the trash can on fire, or phoning in a bomb threat. It never exploded, and agents seem to think that it was eventually disposed of in an Austin landfill. (tbc)
-----------------------------------------------------------------

And so does Chapter 2 of Eric’s book on abortion:

Slowly these egalitarian ideas captured the intelligentsia and from there filtered into the mainstream. “Educated” people in the early twentieth century came to believe in the inevitability of these ideas. “Progress” was a math formula figured out by Marx and Comte. Socio-economic forces were moving us to socialism. Those who accepted these ideas were “progressive.” Those who opposed them were “reactionary.” Just as the anti-abortion statutes reached their final form, the ideas that would ultimately dismantle them were rising to the surface.
In the nineteenth century tolerance for abortion was not expressed in public. Qualifications were emerging, though. Even though she condemned it, Elizabeth Cady Stanton said abortion was the result of “the degradation of women.” Depriving those husbands of children “who have made the strong-minded women. . .the target of jibes and jeers” was somehow just, she said.1 In public most feminists held views similar to Matilida J. Gage, who said “This crime of child murder, abortion, infanticide lies at the door of the male sex.”2 In the pages of their own newspapers, they were starting to express tolerance. Publicly Victoria Woodhull said she wished abortion was unnecessary, but she “understood” why a woman would get one.
After the turn of the century, the New Women arrived. Margaret Sanger was typical of the new breed of iconoclast. In her Woman Rebel, Sanger gave perfect expression to the egalitarian position on abortion: “The attitude of America law and ‘public opinion’ on the subject of abortion is about 1,000 years behind Turkey. In Turkey abortion is not punished.”3 Sanger’s Comrade Victor Meric stated the position bluntly: “If a woman is to free herself effectively, she must make herself absolute mistress of her body. She must recognize her absolute right. . .to suppress the germ of life.”4
In keeping with the view that man was the slave of material forces, there was a new approach to social relief as well. Older homes such as Erring Women’s Refuge had emphasized Christian charity and individual transformation -- change the person and she will change her environment. Margaret Sanger thought such institutions made “women a traitor to her class and aimed to reform her by means of a scrubbing brush or a club.”5 Material conditions caused social ills. Change those conditions and the social ills would disappear. Judge Ben Lindsey in his book The Companionate Marriage attacked the Christian “teaching about Original Sin and the Fall of Man.” He asked, “Why don’t you drop all that and commit yourself to the thesis that human beings are only too glad to be good if they can see their way to being so? What I say to young people is this: you are free agents. . . .The judge that must judge you is your heart and conscience. . .”6
“Social Worker” was the name given to the new class of reformers. One by one the old homes were closed down, or pushed out of the mainstream of relief work. In Cleveland, Ohio Mirian Morton was happy to see “professional social workers” replace the “benevolent old ladies, who had earlier distributed relief and spiritual salvation.”7 The social workers were morally neutral and saw the plight of the poor as primarily economic, not moral. Morality became utilitarian. By removing unwanted mouths to feed, egalitarians argued that abortion was one way to alleviate poverty. Abortion was now seen as compassionate and progressive, a means for poor women to escape a life of poverty. Abortion was good because that which cures poverty is good. And for the true progressives, abortion was a way of addressing female inequality in general.
Egalitarianism infected doctors as well. As educated “men of science,” they were expected to adopt the new progressive ethics. Just a generation earlier their fathers drove abortion out of the land. But they were “modern,” and had read Darwin, Marx, and Mill at college. They looked down on their fathers as “old fashioned,” and “unscientific.” Rather than using science as a tool, they saw themselves as the servants of science, science as interpreted by materialists such as Marx. Science was leading man somewhere, and they had to follow. Storer thought abortion a crime against God and Nature, the new breed had a different opinion. Dr. Henry Marcy argued in the Journal of the American Medical Association that the “product of early impregnation is of so little importance that abortion should not be established as a serious offense.”8 Dr. Klotz-Forest said, “Legally abortion is a crime. Honestly and scientifically it is not. One can only hope that good sense will triumph in the end, and that abortion performed, by an able practitioner in the best hygienic surroundings will soon come to be regarded as useful, necessary, and humane, even in cases in which the women requests it for no other reason than that she does not wish to have a child, that it is not her pleasure to become a mother.”9 The American Journal of Public Health applauded when the Soviet Union became the first country to legalize abortion in 1921: “legalized abortion is the only means for women’s liberation…”10 How modern.
(tbc)
------------------------------------------------------------------

Hello, folks, As you may know, POC Lee Smart is scheduled to be released from halfway house on June 12, at which time he will have completed his sentence. As far as I know, he is not scheduled to have any restrictions from having contact with folks opposed to childkilling.
As you probably are aware, the transition from imprisonment back to life on the outside can be very stressful, trying to find a decent job in middle age while having a criminal record. If you would like to help Lee out with a few bucks at this time, or know of someone who might wish to help, I'm sure it would mean a lot to Lee.
Lee's address after June 12 is not known, but you can send to Lee's mother, and Lee will be sure to receive what you send. Lee would prefer postal money orders, he says that those are easier for him to cash.
Lee’s mother does not want her address made public. If you can send Lee something, mail it to me and I’ll see he gets it

TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:

DATE OF CEASE and DESIST ORDER of JULY 1ST, 2009

I (Leland Smart) have been given a Direct Order to Cease and Desist any and all contacts, and/or associations with anyone involved within the christian pro-life community.

FURTHERMORE; I have been given an Order to Cease and Desist any communications, written, and/or e-mail(S), letters, phone calls, etc., from anyone involved within the christian pro-life community.

UPON penalty of further incarceration within the Federal Bureau of Prisons, I Declare that I (Leland Smart) have been issued a Cease and Desist Order, and have been Ordered not to have any associations and/or contacts with anyone within the christian pro-life community. I will not associate and/or communicate with anyone within the christian pro-life community.

ANY MAILINGS, e-mails, AND/OR communications will not

Respectfully Leland Smart

What about the Jewish pro-life community, which is minuscule, and the Muslim pro-Life community, which is humongous?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
.
Vengeance vs. Defensive Action

The shooting of late term abortionist George Tiller has revealed the hearts of pro-lifers: Some are cheered by Tiller’s death, others pull a long face. It should be noted that many who bewail Tiller’s death are secretly glad he is gone.
George Tiller was not your run-of-the-death-mill baby-killer. He was symbolic of the baby-killing industry. He grew in stature as he handily overcame personal obstacles and professional accusations. He made the black art of baby-killing acceptable, perhaps even noble to the public at large.
Tiller represented the baby-killing industry as their point man. He was the face that baby-killing Americans came to love, and pro-lifers love to hate. With legal impunity, wearing a shark-skin suit, Tiller killed the “big babies” with a smile.
Tiller was well connected, especially after the November Republican defeat. He did not squander his fortune, as most baby-killers do, on wine, women, and drugs; he invested wisely in politicians. Pro-choice-to-kill Governor Sebelius kept her protégé from being charged and convicted of a litany of violations of Kansas law. A rising star in Obama’s administration, Sebelius would have taken Tiller along with her. Maybe even as Surgeon General.
Wichita’s perpetual beacon of hope, Troy Newman, promised Tiller’s head on a platter. But every attack on Tiller was thwarted. Hoping against hope Troy petitioned Kansas’s Medical Board to pull Tiller’s license. Poppycock! That simply would not happen. Tiller, acquitted of violating Kansas’s laws, was in no serious trouble with the medical board.
The David and Goliath routine was looking bad for David until an unknown champion appeared on the scene. God’s chosen instrument, with a single bullet to the braincase, slew Goliath. Rather than take courage from this change of fortune, Troy and
his camp ran the other way thinking “Boy, the Philistines are going to be pissed!”
Sweating bullets, Troy was the first to apologize to both the pro-aborts and pro-lifers. “And gee, we were so close to getting Tiller’s medical license pulled!”
Now that we have set the stage, let us examine the pre-text for why Troy and others renounce this shooters brave, unselfish act: Troy tells us that the shooter is a “coward” and a “vigilante.” We all know what a coward is but the definition of a vigilante is “any person who takes the law into his or her own hands, as by avenging a crime.”
We do not know if the shooter's motive was vengeance or if he was acting in defense of the pre-born. The definition for self-defense and defense of others is “the right for civilians acting on their own behalf to engage in violence for the sake of defending one's own life or the lives of others, including the use of deadly force.”
Self defense and the defense of others is justifiable homicide.
This defense is denied Tiller’s shooter as our laws do not recognize the humanity and worth of the pre-born. Those of us who do recognize the person of the Preborn should understand that the use of force is justifiable in protecting the pre-born children, but such is not the case.
In the posts that I have read from Troy and others, they assume the shooter’s motive to be vengeance, rather than defensive
action. Troy was quick to condemn Tiller’s shooter without knowing his true motive. You can stab a man’s character as surely as you shoot his person.
I proffer this fine distinction because it is important to hand-wringing soul-searching theologians sorting through the dainty innuendos, presuppositions, and new and old winds of doctrine.
But I do not believe the shooter’s motive to be important, as it amounts to defensive action no matter what his motive was.
Tiller was a serial killer. He killed the week he was killed, and like the punctual rape of every blessed day, he was scheduled to
kill again. The shooter’s bullet, like David’s stone, stopped Tiller’s bloody hands cold.
But along with the death of George Tiller, is the toppling of the invincible baby-killing idol of aborticide.
Like the Munchkins in the Wizard of Oz, news of Tiller’s death was at first hard to believe. While many of us broke into a joyful song, others broke into a shameful retreat. dan holman
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Let me know if you’d like it made known that you are the author of this because either I never had or I lost that information. Also, does anyone know what IAAP stands for?

I freely admit that I have been "radicalized" by the failed pro-life bowel movement. The use of bloody baby pictures has most assuredly incited me to think of doing violence to clinics, as well as to those who have done those horrible things to womb children. The so called leaders of the bowel movement are guilty of radicalizing people like me and Scott, by insisting on showing the bloody pictures, and calling abortion murder. It is the height of hypocrisy to show bloody children to men of conscience, and then turn around and call them cowards, when such men take actions the picture incited them to do. The current round of self preservation statements by the bowel movement "leaders," have grieved me to the bottom of my soul. I stand in open rebuke of all the pretentious leaders who have condemned Scott Roeder as a coward when it was their actions that have incited him most to act. They show us pictures of dead children, call abortion murder, then condemn anyone who would dare truly to act on the words that were never sincerely meant. I do not care how many collars you put on backwards, if you have done such things, you have sinned against Scott Roeder, and you have condemned the pro-life bowel movement to failure. If it were not for IAAP, I would be sharing a cell with Scott, or a dirt quilt with Paul Hill. IAAP represents the truth, without inciting violence. It has given many a place to take action who have totally rejected the failed tactic of showing dead children in public. Even if the phony leaders of the failed prolife bowel movement haven't the courage to repent of the evil they incited, I publicly do so now. And I publicly apologize to Scott Roeder for my part in this mess. We simply can not have it both ways. I will never condemn people for taking action a failed movement incited them to take. And if these so called leaders were honest, neither would they.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Hello John I want to thank U again for continuing with Eric's book in your newsletter As U know I am working to put his book in print. I have a graphic artist working on the cover and he needs some statements for the back of the cover from those who have read it there -- two or three sentences of comments.
Since I am not familiar with any of the prolife people other than M. Bray and Don Spitz I would appreciate U sending out this notice or printing it in your July newsletter if it is not too late. Your help is gratefully appreciated.
Thank U. Patricia Rudolph

PS Sorry I could not reach UR son for this book project but a printer here in town has offered to help. It will be printed however on Amazon.com books on demand
---------------------------------------------------------------

These two phone calls of 6/26/2009 are on my answering machine. I told the Reading police about them, 10 a.m., 7/2/09, but I could see the cop behind the window was annoyed with petty stuff like this, so we agreed to drop it and I left.

#1 -- John Dunkle, I have reason to believe that there is going to be counter-terror against right-to-lifers, and I have further reason to believe that you are going to be a target, and I would strongly recommend you take a vacation somewhere outside of the country and that you take your family with you because I don’t think they are safe in the USA. Good luck.

#2 – You should know that even though your website only lists a post office box, your address at 204 South 4th Street in Reading is on the net!

I recognized the voice. It was cruel.
--------------------------------------------------------------------

I wrote Robert recently telling him I’d lost these writings. But I just found them.

Mr. Dunkle, Three brief items:

1) I will be released from disciplinary segregation on the 19th. My correct address is (see above)
2) In the most recent issue, Frank Joseph M.D. stated, “Remember, ‘Thou Shalt Not Kill’ applies equally to the killer of Tiller and to the children in the womb.” NO IT DOES NOT!!! Else how could Phinehas’ act (Num. 25:7-8) be “counted unto him for righteousness unto all generations for evermore”? (Ps 106:30-31). Ex. 20:13 applies only to the unjust taking of life.
3) To Tobra Potter, Please send me your address again. The officers “Lost” my address book amongst many other things when they moved me to disciplinary segregation.. Robert Weiler

Robert was segregated for mailing “Ezekiel Letters” like the one below, which was sent to The National Abortion Federation and returned as undeliverable:

Dear Babykillers, I am writing to warn you of the judgment that shall come upon you should you not repent of your abominations immediately. Do not think you can escape justice for violating God’s Law. Do not think he shows mercy to those actively rebelling against him. Nay, he will bring a sword against you. Your blood will be upon your own head. You have sown death, and death you shall reap. Your destruction shall be as Sodom and Gomorrah of old. This is a warning, it may be your last.
This letter is not, nor is it intended to be, a threat. I write to warn you of the actions that God, not I, will execute should you stiff-neckedly continue to disregard His Law.
The Watchman (Robert Weiler)

Now that Tiller the Killer is burning in Hell, “pro-life” organizations are tripping over each other to be the first to condemn Scott Roeder’s righteous act. However, I believe that any truth worth speaking has already been worded better in Scripture. Therefore, I respond to Mr. Roeder’s actions in this manner:
Then stood up [Scott Roeder] and executed judgment . . .
And that was counted unto him for righteousness
Unto all generations for evermore. (Ps. 106:30-31)
I encourage those within the antiabortion movement to stand beside Mr. Roeder and his family. Pray for and with them.
Scott Roeder showed that he has the courage to defend the unborn; he showed that he actually sees the humanity of the unborn. May he be an example to the cowards speaking out against him who affirm the humanity of the pre-born but deny them the rights inherent to humanity.
Organizations like “Operation Rescue,” and “Priests for Life” who have spoken out against Mr. Roeder need to understand that the unborn are entitled to a defense, even if it means the death of the unjust aggressor.
Tiller himself chose his fate. He showed that only death would protect the children from his murderous hands. He did not stop when his abortuary was bombed. He did not stop when Shelley Shannon put the bullets in him. He had the audacity to serve as an usher at a “Christian” church with blood on his hands. Indeed, he proved that the only good abortionist is a dead abortionist.
Sincerely, Robert Weiler
------------------------------------------------------------------

Maybe a Little Mouse Angel in Heaven
By James Kopp

I am so sad to have to report that our dear little Breezy has left this miserable vale of tears. She died October 27 or the early hours of the 28th, and thank God Almighty there was a measure of breathing at the end, although she was such a tough guy and a non-complainer that it may be hard to know. But she was not suffocating at the end, an idea too horrible to imagine for me.
You cannot teach an old dog new tricks, and though i chill with the Byzies and hang with the Romans, i cannot ever leave my Evangelical roots learned at my Mother's knee: I must hear a sinner repent and claim Jesus, there's just no other way. But that's me. The Lord can have mercy, and the Holy Spirit can translate stuff. I feel as if I am not permitted to do these things: I must work for the only goal I know. But, the Lord can fill the gap. We can't know for sure, much as we'd like to. Jesus is in the assurance business (Revc.12:5), and I am in the Jesus business. Even for people who do confess Him, and, as He says, that includes many hypocrites, or worse. If it weren't so, abortion would have stopped by now. Jesus is in the assurance business,
and i am in the Jesus business. I can't know, or guarantee. That's His turf.
Still, i wanted to thank you so much, so very, very much for helping to carry this burden these months. I felt it quite clearly, your prayers while she was alive, and i felt quite strongly, and i felt quite strongly that all He was asking us to do is pray and write little letters. (tbc)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Now I will begin a long letter from the doyen down under, Peter Knight:

Greetings John, You may possible recall, John, that in December, 2008, you published a letter from someone called Greg Cunningham. Greg Cunningham is a director of an organization which bears the falsehood name – “The Center For Bio-Ethical Reform”. This is an organization which, in a weak effort to convince pro abortionists to change their views, produces and sells images of aborted babies.
Greg Cunningham is one of those who condemn the martyr Paul Hill. And condemn the method he used for addressing the problems of abortion. If you recall the letter, you’ll probably remember that it was nonsense from the first line right through to the last. There was no let-up at all. Unfortunately, though, it is nonsense which is purported to be truth by a number of people.
There are a couple of things which Greg Cunningham mentioned which I don’t think I’ve said anything about before, at least not to you. Greg Cunningham, like Aram Berard, says that he has convinced himself that if similar actions were taken against abortionists to the ones they’ve used millions of times themselves, then that violent reaction would so greatly influence people whose concerns are with other issues, that those people would be driven to resolve those other disputes in what G. C. described as “a wave of simultaneous jihads.” What Greg Cunningham is saying here is – never use violence for a just cause, because someone with a simple mind might be influenced by that to use it for an unjust cause.
There are a large number of very violent incidents mentioned in the Bible. Many people, over many centuries, have been influenced by these to use violence themselves. Almost every Jew and Christian, including Paul Hill, has cited these incidents to justify his own use of violence. So if Greg Cunningham’s reasoning is to remain consistent, reasoning which says that the possible bad influence of violence is a reason for condemning Paul Hill’s actions, then he must say that the Bible should be banned, or at the very least, that its many incidents of well-publicized and influential violence should be edited out. After all, that’s where Paul Hill got his ideas from in the first place. So remove the initial cause. Remove the initial bad influence before it does any further harm and creates any more Paul Hills.
Jesus made a bad mistake and lacked foresight when he flogged the merchants out of the temple. He should have had the wisdom of people like Greg Cunningham and known that those with susceptible minds would be influenced by that and use it to justify acts of violence for many hundreds of years to come. Just how important was it for him to take to them with a whip anyway? In all probability they came straight back in as soon as he left. Why do we need to retain this one in the Bible? Shouldn’t it be taken out so that Jesus’ mistake can be corrected? And if it can’t be edited out completely, then couldn’t it be changed a bit to say that they’d merely been requested to leave, without saying how forceful the request was? After all, if we’d had a wiser man like Greg Cunningham or Aram Berard there, that’s how they would have handled the situation. You’d never find any whips in their hands.

And what of Elijah’s slaying of the 850. Why mention and be concerned about Paul Hill’s puny contribution when you’ve got an incident like that influencing people? Chop chop chop chop chop chop, 850 of them in just one afternoon. Surely that’s one which we simply must get rid of for Greg Cunningham. Or if it can’t be removed completely, why can’t we have a different translation of the Bible for Aram Berard and Greg Cunningham? A translation that says that after being given a stern warning to repent and mend their ways the 850 went home to live happily ever after. After all, that, once again, is how the situation would have been dealt with if we had the wisest of the wise there instead of Elijah. How much better a publication would the Bible have been if we had Greg Cunningham standing there in place of Elijah and Moses and Joshua and David and Jesus and all the rest of them?
Don’t simply judge whether it’s a just cause for using violence. Consider the possible side effects on very simple-minded people. That’s what I think G.C. is saying. And he asserts that the side- effects of a violent reaction to abortionists would be just so catastrophic as to outweigh any advantages.
So what then is a realistic assessment of how the pros and cons stack up as regards what would have happened had there been 200 or so Paul Hills in America – one in each one-and-a-half-million people, and a similar proportion elsewhere? The pros in America alone, over the past four decades, are that there would have been no abortionists around to take the lives of fifty million children from them. Anyone who suggested that that justifies violence would have greatly influenced other people so greatly that their actions would have caused greater loss of life elsewhere, or half as much (twenty-five million) or one tenth as much, or one hundredth as much, or one thousandth as much (fifty thousand) they are a complete rat bag who has or pretends to have paranoid delusional fears – “a wave of simultaneous jihads” no less. (tbc)