Wednesday, May 08, 2013

"Contraception" is Murder, June 2, 11-4, 2013



 

formerly, Abortion is Murder, and, before that, skyp

(stop killing young  people)

 

June 2, 2013,  Vol. 11   No. 4

PO Box 7424, Reading, PA 19603

Phone, 484-706-4375


Web, skyp1.blogspot.com

Circulation, 241

Editor, John Dunkle

 

  “Contraception” is Murder, a weak, pathetic response to baby murder, is sent out at least once a month.  If the gestapo hasn’t jailed you yet for defending the innocent realistically, you either have to tell me you want it or go to the website.  Emails are free but snail-mail is free only for PFCs, two grand for others.

 

  Because I believe we should examine every legitimate means, including force, in our attempt to protect those being tortured to death, I want to hear from people who’ve been forceful and from those who defend them.  I’d also like to hear from those who oppose the prolife use of force and call it violence.

 

 

Prisoners  For  Christ:

 

1.        Curell, Benjamin D., Monroe County Jail
301 N College Ave., Bloomington, IN 47404

2.         Evans, Paul Ross 83230-180,  FCI, PO Box 1500, El Reno, OK 73036

3.         Griffin, Michael 310249, BRCF, 5914 Jeff Atles Rd., Milton, FL 32583-00000

4.         Grady, Francis 11656-089, USP Terre Haute, PO Box 33, Terre Haute, IN 47808

5.         Holt, Gregory 129616   Varner Supermax, PO Box 600, Grady, AR 71644-0600    

6.         Kopp, James 11761-055,  USP Canaan, P.O. Box 300, Waymart, PA 18472 

7.         Roeder, Scott 65192  PO Box 2, Lansing, Kansas 66043

8.         Rogers, Bobby Joe 21292-017, USP Beaumont,  PO Box 26050, Beaumont, TX 77720

9.         Rudolph, Eric 18282-058  US Pen. Max,  Box 8500, Florence  CO 81226-8500

10.       Shannon, Rachelle 59755-065, FCI Waseca, Unit A,  P.O. Box 1731, Waseca, MN 56093   

11.       Waagner, Clayton Lee 17258-039, USP, P.O. Box 1000, Lewisburg  PA 17837

   

 

  The very brave Randy Engel has me thinking:

 

  The root of abortion is contraception! Let me say it again. The root of abortion is contraception!

  The court decision that ushered in Roe v. Wade was Griswold v. Connecticut.  And until Humanae Vitae is preached and preached and preached, attacking abortion is like cutting the snakes off the head of Medusa. They will grow back stronger than ever.

  Cardinal Burke recognizes the importance of individual bishops fighting the culture of death relentlessly. But it must include calling people back to the integrity of the sexual act itself. 

  Contraception is a love-killing act that precedes the baby-killing act. Both need to be fought vigorously by our shepherds.

 

  Will Randy persuade me to change the name of the newsletter again, this time by dropping the quotation marks around “Contraception,” and changing “is” to “leads to”?

  I use the marks to attack practices like the ingestion of RU-486 and the insertion of the diaphragm that do not result in contraception at all, but in murder.  And I did not realize that “Grisleyworld” was key!

  This comment from the Catholic bishop of Lincoln, Nebraska might influence my decision:  

 

  The Gosnell case suggests that our society’s view of human life is deeply wrong. It suggests that a culture of contraception cannot avoid becoming a “culture of death”—in which some lives are seen not as gifts, but as burdens.

 

  Engel writes in response to an interview Cardinal Burke gave to Hilary White on April 23 in LifeSiteNews.com, and she’s not happy with it:

 

  Surely Cardinal Burke jests. The NCCB/USCC [USCCB] is the main reason why we are in such an anti-life pickle especially its promotion of sex instruction and silence on government population control. For 40 years the Prolife Movement has had to fight the anti-life compromises of the NCCB/USCC along with the anti-life establishment.  Someone needs to sit Burke down and explain to him the facts of life and death in AmChurch with its homosexual-dominated hierarchy.. . .

  Instead of giving awards to pro-abortion politicians and leaders, they need to start acting like supporting the murder of the innocent is the atrocity it really is. 

  Cardinal Dolan (and other princes of the Church in the United States), stop honoring and kowtowing to the modern Hitlers in our midst. Hitler didn't kill the innocent personally, he developed the policies and authorized the atrocities.  When you honor our modern Hitlers and Stalins and Pol Pots and Maus, you become a serious part of the problem.

  Please act like men, like shepherds who defend the sheep from the wolves and fathers who face death rather than let their children be slaughtered. Please, Your Excellencies, stop giving us stones and snakes when we ask for bread and fish!

 

  Read the interview.  Do you think Randy is fair?

  ___________________

  --------------------------------

 

  Cal suggests I change the second paragraph in column 1 to this:

 

I think we can all agree there is nothing peaceful, nonviolent, or prolife about letting innocent children be killed. So I believe we should examine every legitimate means, including force, in our attempt to protect children from being tortured to death. I want to hear from people who’ve been forceful and from those who defend them. I’d also like to hear from those who oppose the prolife use of force and call it violence.

 

  Again, what do you think?

  ____________________

  ----------------------------------

 

  And Jake nails one in the local paper:

 

Editor:    It apparently escaped the attention of the Eagle, but, in the midst of the horrors of the Gosnell trial in Philadelphia, President Obama used the occasion to speak at Planned Parenthood and impugn the motives of pro-life activists.  It seems the only reason our president can think of for defending the lives of innocent, helpless unborn babies is to “drag us back to the fifties.”  Come to think of it, some of us would gladly swap today’s culture for that of the fifties.

  ___________________

  --------------------------------

 

  In Jewels Green’s remembrance here, I’m the “man who was also in attendance”:

 

  Did you ever love someone so much you ignored your own needs, putting those of your beloved ahead of yours?

  Did you ever love someone so much that you sacrificed your time and energy for only the hope of doing good for them, helping them, protecting them?

  Did you ever love a stranger so much that you did these things–without complaint–with unwavering dedication for days and days? Months? Years? Decades? …

  When I worked at an abortion clinic throughout my early twenties, I thought I knew the truth. In spite of my own life-changing and horrific experience of being pressured into an abortion and my subsequent suicide attempt–I had convinced myself (tricked myself?) into believing abortion was a necessary service. I thought we were doing good. I thought *I* was doing good. I thought we were helping these troubled women facing insurmountable obstacles. I thought we were relieving them of their burdens, eliminating their problems. We only eliminated their pregnancies–we only eliminated their babies–not their problems. I know that now, but decades ago I did not.

  We called the pro-lifers outside “anti’s”, short for “anti-abortion” and we openly joked about them.

  But there was one protestor, one man, who caught and held my interest. For years. He was routinely alone, and even if there were others present (especially on a Saturday, the busiest day in the abortion industry) he stood off to one side, obviously apart from the group. He was there every Saturday, and usually a couple of other days during the week as well. He was there in the rain, the snow, the blistering sun, without fail, for the more than five years I worked at the abortion center.

  He did not hold a graphic sign, he did not have a bullhorn, he did not shout, he never broke the law, he simply held a large picture of Our Lady of Guadalupe and he prayed. And prayed.

  At the time I was a rarely church-going Protestant, and poorly educated in the specifics of other faiths. I’d asked one of my co-workers what was on his sign and I was told it was “the patron saint of Mexico, Our Lady of Guadalupe.” Back then I didn’t know who “Our Lady” was, much less that every “Our Lady of [fill in the blank]” were all different appearances in different places and times of the one Virgin Mary, mother of Jesus. And I certainly didn’t know of the significance of Our Lady of Guadalupe in relationship to the protection of the unborn.

  Even then, when I firmly disagreed with him, I admired him. I was in awe of his dedication, his resolve, his strength, his courage. He was not a young man, and he had to have been uncomfortable–if not in pain–some of those days he selflessly devoted to praying for the unborn babies scheduled to die only a handful of yards away from where he stood. He prayed for the helpless babies of mothers and fathers he’d never met, never knowing if his sacrifice ever bore fruit. I remember often looking out the window at him and wondering what it was he thought he was accomplishing by his seemingly futile efforts to silently dissuade mothers from getting abortions. But I also remember realizing, with a raw and shameful honesty, that there was nothing–no person, no cause–that I cared enough about to do what he was doing.

  When I share my testimony and witness, I often mention this man, and how I credit him with planting seeds in my heart that helped lead to my eventual conversion–both to the pro-life worldview and to Catholicism.

  I can’t speak to whether or not he saved any babies, or touched the hearts of those who accompanied mothers seeking abortions, but I can tell you he reached me. Twenty-odd years later, it is he who I remember, who I still admire, for his refusal to become discouraged.

  Last week I had the privilege of speaking at a fundraising banquet for Lifeline of Berks County, a pregnancy resource center located about 45 miles from the clinic where I used to work in Pennsylvania. I told the story of this man, and the impact he had on me, and a woman approached me after the program to tell me she knew the name of the man I spoke about, and his name was Ed Kuchar. I usually maintain composure when I speak publicly about my experiences (I cry on the way home) but I could not hold back tears when she told me he had passed away a few years ago.  A man who was also in attendance that night e-mailed me today to let me know that he’d met someone who knew this gentleman, as well as his widow, and was looking forward to sharing my story with her.

  Our God is an awesome, unknowable, yet omnipresent force in our lives. In each and every one of us. His love and light will shine through anyone with an open heart. His light will dispel the darkness.

  If you are inspired and grateful for the lasting fruits of the steadfast witness of this one soul bearing witness to evil in defense of life, I invite to join me in praying for Edward J. Kuchar who was called home to our LORD in 2007. May he know peace beyond all understanding in the perfect, eternal, and loving embrace of our LORD.

  ________________

  ---------------------------

 

   I’ve told you before that I occasionally misplace letters PFCs send me.   Here’s one from Paul Ross Evans.  It has no date and I couldn’t make out the one on the envelope, but it must be two or three years old:

 

 Dear John,  I’ve watched, with concern, all of the hot spots in Northern Africa and the Middle East lately. This has been going on for years, has it not? As far as our pursuit of Taliban forces and Al Qaeda insurgency in Iraq and Afghanistan, after leaving so many young men and women behind, are we any close to defeating militant Islam?  I think not.  But we must support these efforts where they are given honestly.  It is clear that, throughout the “Arab Spring,” in countries like Libya and Yemen, and others, there is turmoil.  But where will this turmoil lead?  Once one tyrant is unseated, another shows up gaining complete control.  Militant Islam is a great enemy of Christendom.  In these types of dynamic social and economic situations, the Lenins and Maos are born.

  In the West on the flip side of things, we don’t have the sea of  social dissatisfaction and poverty that militant Islam recruits from.  This is a key factor in WHY so many are hesitant to give up the comforts we’ve come to know on this side of our vast planet, and trade them for --  risk of arrest, living on the lam, living in a prison, or losing one’s life. In thinking of such issues, I always remember the old verse that rings true:

      Ye have not yet resisted unto  

      blood, striving against sin.

      Hebrews 12:4

  I’ve said before, all men are not meant to resist in such a way.  I still feel this way.  I hear much talk in this newsletter, and in other circles, that all are called to be soldiers in the wordily battlefield.  All are called to resist evil. This much is true.  But we all must remember that there are different ways to resist evils, domestically and abroad.  For Paul also said:

      . . . we wrestle not against flesh

      and blood, but against

      principalities, against powers,

      against the rulers of darkness of

      this world, against  spiritual

      wickedness in high places. 

      Ephesians 6:12

    Living in countries – not necessarily 3rd world – but countries that do not have the luxuries and amenities that we have grown used to, a citizen glimpses the raw importance of God and Nation.  In the United States we have been taken care of so nicely for so long (most of us weren’t alive during the Great Depression) we have never known poverty or hardship, real hardship.

    Communism was successful in many Asian countries because their propaganda efforts focused on the “betterment of a poor class.”  Around the world at the time, such Communist literature and efforts circulated, we (Americans) were seen as self-righteous, pampered, pompous know-it-alls (as we are in most cases today.

  My point with all this is simple: In our efforts today to spread the Word of the Lord, sowing the seed of the Good News (and simultaneously battling the lies of Communism and Militant Islam), we must get off of our high horses.  Domestically, we have to relate to others, destroying the invisible barriers between those of us who have set out to resist abortion, homosexuality, and paganism vs. those who are at the cross    roads of embracing or rejecting such action/ideologies.  I’ll say, again, this is a form of resisting evil as well.

  Now, much has been said about forceful opposition against abortionists.  Obviously, I have chosen to go a certain way, opposing abortion through forceful action, and for that I have no regret.  Throughout history men and women of good conscience have forcefully opposed Evil and tyranny.  Throughout history communities and nations have made simple decisions to physically resist an aggressor who attacks the defenseless.

  Militant Islam resists the West through violent, daily-committed action.  They have lived outside in caves for a decade now, even during the cold winter months.  They sell their own homes to buy so-called anti-aircraft guns, and many thymes lose them after one use. They risk (high-potential) death, sneaking up to well-guarded roads to leave bombs, at the mere chance of inflicting injury.   They leave their families  and their homes for years, and most times come home to  nothing.  For what?  Because they believe that the West is a beacon of paganism, Evil, sexual immorality, homosexuality, child killers, and oppressors.  How far is that from the truth?  What do we really do to promote Christianity, and its values, anymore?  What are we more focused on in this day, making sure everyone is “satisfied and unoffended” or clearly defining Right/Wrong through upright moral codes?

  Here, in the “good ol’ U.-S.-of-A.,” we kill babies. There are men who get up early every day (and women), and feel perfectly safe driving expensive cars, wearing spotless lab coats, with the sole intention of killing as many babies as they possibly can in one day.  No one touches them.  No one bothers them.

  Here you have entire regions of planet earth resisting the West, these Middle Eastern peoples who have dedicated generation after generation to our destruction, all because “we degenerate their morals.”  Yet we, here in our smug homes flipping the remote control, won’t even raise a finger to defend a helpless child.  Why really is backward, demonic, and uncivilized?

  “Self-examination makes for a fine soldier.”

 

  See, Jimbo?  It’s not always their fault.  (Jim Kopp complains that PFCs don’t write often enough here.)

  ____________________________

  ----------------------------------------------

 

    Shulie

 

   If anyone doubts the existence of Satan, have her read “Death of a Revolutionary,” the story of Shulamith Firestone, in the April 15 issue of The New Yorker.

  The Ol’ Boy used Ms. Firestone along with Kate Millett, Betty Friedan, Gloria Steinem, Letty Cottin Pogrebin, Jo Freeman, Robin Morgan, Marilyn Webb, Ellen Willis, Elaine Showalter, Kathie Sarachild, Carol Giardina, Ti-Grace Atkinson, Susan Brownmiller, and others to usher in our era of child murder, but he ushered in Shulie with greatest intensity:  In March, 1969, Firestone organized the nation’s first abortion speakout, at Judson Memorial Church on Washington Square.”  

  A year later the whole state followed the lead of the woman in Greenwich Village, and four short years after that seven feminine men on the Supreme Court turned the whole country into Satan’s backyard.

 

  But look what happened to the women Satan used. The feminist writer of the article, Susan Faludi, tells us that “last fall, as I interviewed New York’s founding radical feminists, the stories of ‘social defeat’ mounted: painful solitude, poverty, infirmity, mental illness, and even homelessness.”

    Millet had a nervous breakdown and was committed to a mental hospital.  Ellen Frankfort, the author of “Vaginal Politics,” and Elizabeth Fisher, the founder of Alphra, committed suicide.  And on and on.  Atkinson said, “Sisterhood is powerful.  It kills sisters.” 

  But nothing compares to what Satan did to Firestone.  A friend tells us that he visited this “epicenter of the radical-feminist movement” at her Tenth Street studio apartment and a “cockroach was walking across her desk.  She went to crush it, and its guts smeared out in this really grotesque awful mess.  And her remark?  ‘That’s the story of my life.’”   Then  neighbors complained that “Firestone was screaming in the night and that she had left the taps running  until the floorboards gave way. . . .

  “She withdrew into her old seclusion, not answering the phone or the door.  One spurned visitor recalled that she heard a torrent of Hebrew coming from inside the apartment.  Firestone was reciting Jewish prayers. . . .  She again began to be hospitalized repeatedly, ultimately in the gritty public ward of Bellevue Hospital.”  But she kept returning to her public assistance studio.

  When they found her lying face down there, she had been dead four days.

 

  The Lord Jesus Christ is not the only one who needs and recruits martyrs to achieve his goals.

  _________________________________

  ----------------------------------------------------

 

  Scott has Neal thinking:

 

  John, the segment about Scott Roeder’s comments in the last newsletter got me thinking about how easy it would be to create a mathematical model for the likelihood of abolishing legalized abortion using the present tactics advocated by the law-abiding as well and the law-attacking portions of the pro-life movement.

 

  Neal draws up the mathematical model here that shows it will take us 100 years to end abortion if we wait until a hundred baby killers are terminated.  (Someone had predicted that legal baby killing would end when a hundred of their killers had been stopped cold.) 

 

  Now I confess I get very perplexed when the most serious group of abortion abolitionists (the people who read your newsletter) come up with a strategy that requires another 80 years of abortionist post-birth abortions before we have even a theory of how to stop this legalized abortion.  I get perplexed because I see those 80 years as actually the day by day legalized slaughter of app. 4000 babies per day.  Oops, that’s another factor in the equation: 4000 X 365 days X 80 years= 63.8 hectagazillion little eviscerated people.

  Now here’s why I think this equation is important.  I get so pissed off when I think about people who think they are leaders in the resistance to legalized abortion when sacrificing another X hectagazillion people is the best strategic thinking they can come up with that it tempts me to figure out a way to just start shooting these abortionist mothermurderers until I personally get the remaining 92 abortionists in Mike Bray’s mathematical model.  But obviously I couldn’t plan, much less talk about, actually doing something like that without getting in very serious trouble.  So I confine my reaction to creating mathematical models that show how utterly preposterous the “strategies” to stop abortion have been up until God showed me the New Army of God strategy explained at http://www.aogusa.org.

  But alas, people have invested so much of themselves—their time, money, hopes—into utterly doofus strategies that everybody except them know have no power whatsoever to abolish legalized abortion that they won’t even think about admitting those strategies are as bankrupt as the USA is going to be and ask the Living God what He wants them to do now that they’ve realized they are bankrupt.  So I stay pissed off and languished.

 

  The only people who piss me off more than the once forceful people who refuse to take a delayed enlistment in the New Army of God I advocate are the law abiding pro-lifers whose strategic theories require a mathematical model that includes infinity as an operative element in the equation they sell to their supporters . . . .

  ______________________

  -------------------------------------

 

  Cathy Ramey introduces this latest gem from Terry Hughes:

 

  The attached document is from Dr. Terrence Hughes, a distinguished emeritus professor at University of Maine. He has written on the Kermit Gosnell case the media decided to largely ignore out of fear the truths expressed in the trial might "risk a woman's right to abortion."
  I invite you to read the article and gain in nderstanding as to why God is judging America. This is not our only national sin either. It makes it clear why God chose Obama to be the "king" at this time; he is just a useless idiot in the hands of an amazing God.     Stand firm

 

The Kermit Gosnel of Pennsylvania Avenue

           

  The President of the United States has admitted he is aware of Kermit Gosnell, a late-term abortionist in Philadelphia who routinely delivers babies alive so he can murder them like Jack The Ripper, but Obama has refused to condemn Gosnell’s serial slaughters, which have been endorsed by Planned Parenthood, America’s leading “provider” of abortions. After cancelling his Thursday speaking engagement at Planned Parenthood’s annual fundraising banquet, claiming he had to go to Texas to mourn victims of a fertilizer plant explosion, Barack Obama made his PP appearance on Friday (26 June 2013) and concluded his speech to a wildly cheering audience by announcing, “I’m fighting with you every step of the way…Thank you Planned Parenthood. God bless you!”

  Why would the “Black” President of the United States invoke God’s blessing on an organization that takes a half-billion dollars annually from American taxpayers and is dedicated to killing without limit the Next Generation of Americans, targeting Black Americans In particular, with 70 percent of PP Abortion Auschwitzes (yes, Auschwitzes) located in Black neighborhoods? Good question. Here’s the answer. PP was founded by Margaret Sanger (Sangre?). In a 1939 letter to patron Clarence Gamble of the Proctor and Gamble fortune, Sanger described what she called her Negro Project. “The most successful educational approach to the Negro is through a religious appeal. We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.”

  Who trumps a Black preacher in advancing this agenda? A Black President of the United States! Especially a President who for twenty years attended the church of preacher Jeremiah “God Damn America” Wright, who baptized his children and whose pro-abortion enthusiasm fits like a glove Obama’s “God Bless Planned Parenthood” enthusiasm.

  Sanger has friends in high places. On 7 July 2009, the New York Times reported U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg as saying, “Frankly, I had thought at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about overpopulation growth and particularly growth in populations we don’t want to have too many of.” Oh? Weren’t we told when the U.S. Supreme Court “legalized” abortion in America in its 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling, the goal was to secure “reproductive rights” for women? Doesn’t that mean a “right” to reproduce? Now we find out it was all about preventing “populations we don’t want to have too many of” from reproducing? Doesn’t that sound a lot like the Arbeit Macht Frei (“Work Will Make You Free”) sign above the entrance to Auschwitz in its attempt to deceive? Judie Brown, President of American Life League, reported in her Oct. – Nov. 2012 newsletter, ALL News, that PP has now murdered over 6 million human beings by abortion, equaling the number of Jews Hitler murdered at Auschwitz and other Nazi extermination camps.

  Why couldn’t a Jewish Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court see the connection? Why has the High Court persisted in defending abortion 40 years later when the American death toll is rapidly approaching 60 million, ten time the number of Jews murdered by Hitler? Make no mistake about this. The Supreme Court ruled in 1973 that the U.S. Constitution ”guaranteed” the “right” to kill the entire next generation of Americans. Every single human being. How did the highest court in the land come to be dominated by sociopaths who don’t know right from wrong?

  PP’s abortion tentacles are slithering into every facet of American life, with lavish funding by the Obama Administration and Congress increasing every year, so taxpayers now subsidize PP with a half-billion dollars annually, while American unemployment and debt climb to ever higher levels. PP is actively getting political support for brainwashing children from K through 12 in public schools with its pornographic “sex education” propaganda in which the only “sin” is having a baby and the only “salvation” is unrestricted abortion. Undercover investigators James O’Keefe and Lila Rose have videos documenting PP provides abortionists for the U.S. sex-slave traffic, killing babies of pregnant underage girls, mostly from Latin America, trapped in that criminal marketing of human flesh, and documenting that PP accepts money specifically earmarked to abort Black babies. PP fights any attempt to inform pregnant women about the dangers of abortion and to provide life-affirmative alternatives. PP is determined to keep pregnant women ignorant and aborted, taunting the mythical hillbilly who wants them barefoot and pregnant. PP operates Abortion Auschwitzes every bit as criminal as Kermit Gosnell’s House Of Horrors in Philadelphia. Gosnell calls it the Women’s Medical Society clinic. Sounds a lot like “Arbeit Macht Frei” doesn’t it?

  Gosnell’s House Of Horrors has been blacked out by the fanatically pro-abortion “mainstream” media. Gosnell’s charnel house has nonetheless become known to the American people: ripped and stained surgery beds that are decades old, blood-stained furniture and blankets, rusting dirty disposable surgical instruments reused again and again, ultrasound, defibrillator, EKG, pulse oximeter, and blood pressure equipment that is broken and not used, an “emergency exit” door that is padlocked, the overpowering stench of death from decaying dead baby parts everywhere, and the smell of urine and excrement from “feeding” cats literally made Pennsylvania investigators vomit. Gosnell has a specialty: drug-induced labor so he can murder babies born alive. He either cuts their throats or jams scissors into the back of their necks and “snips” their spinal cord. And if he doesn’t do it, his “assistants” do it, even teenage girls with no medical training. And they joke about it. Gosnell bragged he murdered one baby who survived his abortion and was so big “I could have walked him to the bus stop.” Gosnell also has a sexual fetish. The feet of babies he has murdered fill large jars all over his Women’s Medical Society “clinic”.

 

  When the pro-abortion media finally began to cover Gosnell’s trial in Philadelphia, it downplayed eye-witness testimony and accused pro-life activists, such as Operation Rescue which exposed Gosnell and demanded a criminal investigation, of “forcing” Gosnell to become a “back-alley butcher” like those the media claimed, without proof, were rampant when abortion was still criminal activity. The truth is, the Pennsylvania Department of Health and Philadelphia’s politically correct law enforcement establishment refused to investigate Gosnell, despite repeated complaints from his female victims. Even when he murdered one of them, “the law” protected him.

 

  One more thing. Kermit Gosnell, like Jeremiah Wright is an “almost white” Black man. The women he aborts and the babies he murders are Black. His decrepit Abortion Auschwitz operates in a Black neighborhood. Just what Margaret Sanger wanted. And our Black President refuses to condemn him by name or even mention him. Just as Margaret Sanger wanted. Had Gosnell been active back then and if abortion had been legal, she could laud him when she roused the rabble at Ku Klux Klan rallies.

  Now we learn that PP runs an abortion charnel house in Wilmington, Delaware, much like Gosnell’s, with local and state authorities casting a “blind eye” on its criminal activities. Two whistleblowers, Jayne Mitchell-Werbrich and Joyce Vasikonis, who worked there, called it a “meat market style of assembly-line abortions where the abortionist refused to wear gloves, surgical instruments were reused without being cleaned, and ‘bloody drainage’ remained on abortion tables between procedures, exposing women to blood-borne diseases.” And what does the President of the United States say? “God bless Planned Parenthood!” Obama on gun control: “If there’s a step we can take to save even one child, we should take that step.” Obama on murdering over 6 million children: “God bless Planned Parenthood!”

  PP has now come out in favor of murdering babies who survive abortion and who are therefore American citizens. That’s what Kermit Gosnell does. And what does President Obama say? “God bless Planned Parenthood!” Why? Because Obama also believes in murdering babies who survive abortions.     (tbc) _________________________________

  ------------------------------------------------------

 

 To send money to the federal Prisoners, those with eight digits after their names, make out a postal money order to the Prisoner’s name and number. Then send it to PO Box 474701,  Des Moines, Iowa 50947-0001.

 

  Ask the non-feds how they may receive money – check, money order, etc. It varies by state

  _________________

  -----------------------------

 

  Receipt of this excellent missive notwithstanding, if you wish to be excluded from such blessings in the future, simply advise me.  

"Contraception" is Murder, June 1, 11-3, 2013



 

formerly, Abortion is Murder, and, before that, skyp (stop killing young  people)

 

June 1, 2013,  Vol. 11   No. 3

PO Box 7424, Reading, PA 19603

Phone, 484-706-4375


Web, skyp1.blogspot.com

Circulation, 244

Editor, John Dunkle 

  “Contraception” is Murder, a weak, pathetic response to baby murder, is sent out at least once a month.  If the gestapo hasn’t jailed you yet for defending the innocent realistically, you either have to tell me you want it or go to the website.  Emails are free but snail-mail is free only for PFCs, two grand for others.

  Because I believe we should examine every legitimate means, including force, in our attempt to protect those being tortured to death, I want to hear from people who’ve been forceful and from those who defend them.  I’d also like to hear from those who oppose the prolife use of force and call it violence.

 

Prisoners  For  Christ: 

1.        Curell, Benjamin D., Monroe County Jail, 301 N College Ave., Bloomington, IN 47404

2.         Evans, Paul Ross 83230-180,  FCI, PO Box 1500, El Reno, OK 73036

3.         Griffin, Michael 310249, BRCF, 5914 Jeff Atles Rd., Milton, FL 32583-00000

4.         Grady, Francis 11656-089, USP Terre Haute, PO Box 33, Terre Haute, IN 47808

5.         Holt, Gregory 129616   Varner Supermax, PO Box 600, Grady, AR 71644-0600    

6.         Kopp, James 11761-055,  USP Canaan, P.O. Box 300, Waymart, PA 18472 

7.         Roeder, Scott 65192  PO Box 2, Lansing, Kansas 66043

8.         Rogers, Bobby Joe 21292-017, USP Beaumont,  PO Box 26050, Beaumont, TX 77720

9.         Rudolph, Eric 18282-058  US Pen. Max,  Box 8500, Florence  CO 81226-8500

10.       Shannon, Rachelle 59755-065, FCI Waseca, Unit A,  P.O. Box 1731, Waseca, MN 56093   

11.       Waagner, Clayton Lee 17258-039, USP, P.O. Box 1000, Lewisburg  PA 17837
  ________________________
  -------------------------------------

  The new Prisoner For Christ is Ben Curell who damaged a mill in Indiana.  Here’s Tobra:

 
BENJAMIN D. CURELL

Our hero paid a visit into a babykilling facility in the notso great state of indiana

Our hero let the notso nice babykillers understand

The long held prolifer viewpoint: if you think abortion is murder act like it!

MR. BENJAMIN D. CURELL is being embraced for his heroic deeds by prolifers throughout the land

Dandydon: we are throwing a BBQ in his honor.

Frank: good job ole chap

Kathielee: folks, no word yet if his ax come from home depot or gingerbelle's garage sale.

Howard: i think it was from gingerbelle's sale, Hell that girl dew provide the necessacities and always has.

Buttercup: unfortunately we have a Judas in the movement.  mike (liar, hypocrite & coward) fitcher and his yadayyada quote is brought to us courtesy of that dashing & debonair DONALD SPITZ.

All: MR. BENJAMIN D. CURELL we salute yew

 

SSSSSSSSSSSSSSAAAAAAAAAAAALLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLUUUUUUUUUUUTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
  _____________________________________
  -------------------------------------------------------
 

  The late George Tiller’s mill has reopened. Here’s what some killers’ helpers had to say: 

  The clinic has been reopened by Julie Burkhart, a former colleague of Dr. Tiller's. Militant anti-choicers in the area have responded in an upsetting, if predictable way: by making the people who work there fear for their safety.
  Kari Ann Rinker, a reproductive rights activist living in Wichita, reports at RH Reality Check on the efforts to intimidate Burkhart. One activist has a restraining order filed against him for picketing her home with a sign that says, "Where is your church?," a reference to Tiller's assassination in a church. David Leach of the group Army of God spoke to Dr. Tiller's murderer, Scott Roeder, and posted the audio of the conversation. He read his statement on the new clinic to Roeder:
 
  “If someone would shoot the new abortionist like Scott shot George Tiller back in the Operation Rescue days, people called him Tiller the Killer, hardly anyone would appreciate it, but the babies. It will be a blessing to the babies, everyone else will panic. Of all places to open up a killing office, to reopen the one office in the United States more notorious for decades than any other is an act of defiance against God and the last remaining remnants of reverence for human life. It is what the Supreme Court classifies as “fighting words,” like throwing lard in a Mosque, burning a cross in a Black neighborhood, or immersing a cross in urine at taxpayers’ expense. It is a reckless act. It is not the act of someone who values her own safety. It is a gauntlet thrown down, by someone who wants a fight. Of course, I don’t know if anyone will pick up the gauntlet. But I  didn’t know if Scott would act before he did either.”

  Roeder loved it and responded:

  “It is a little bit death-defying for someone to walk back in there. For Julie ‘Darkheart’ to walk back in there and reopen a murder mill where a man was stopped. It’s almost like putting a target on your back, saying, ‘Well, let’s see if you can shoot ME!’  I have to go back to what Pastor Mike Bray said: If 100 abortionists were shot, they would probably go out of business. I think eight have been shot, so we’ve got 92 to go. Maybe she’ll be number nine. I don’t know, but she’s kind of painting a target on herself.”

  Troy Newman of Operation Rescue is also doing his part by trying to dig up the identity of the doctor who works for the clinic, to make it easier to harass and stalk her. 

  And here’s what the killers’ helpers on the New York Times editorial board had to say: 

  Dangerous and unconstitutional legislative restrictions, unceasing harassment, threats of violence and fearful doctors having to hide their identities for self-protection: this is what it means to be on the front line of trying to deliver legal and necessary reproductive health care to women in Wichita and other parts of the country where zealous right-wing politicians and activists on the political fringe currently hold sway. 

  Vocal killers’ helpers are one of our greatest assets. Now if more of us could only learn to follow their lead. 
    _______________________________________________-  
  ------------------------------------------------------------------- 

  The president of NARAL, Ilyse Hogue, includes this paragraph in a recent fund-raising letter:

  We call these back-door bans TRAP laws, short for “Targeted Regulation of Abortion Providers.” Like all medical professionals, abortion providers already comply with important health and safety regulations. But TRAP laws are something different: they create a costly and confusing mine-field of additional requirements and regulations not imposed on other medical providers. Anti-choice politicians pretend that TRAP laws are about protecting women’s health, but their real goal is to close down clinics.

  That last sentence frightens me – we anti-choicers  want to close down abortuaries!  It’s scary the way those killers’ helpers can see into our hearts!
  ___________________________________
  ------------------------------------------------------------- 

  Pat Buchanan predicts that the political success of homosexual activity (like “gay” marriage) will inspire us to fight back realistically, and he compares it to the battle for civil rights for African-Americans:  

  Priests and pastors marched for civil rights. Others preached for civil rights. But if the gay rights agenda is imposed, we could have priests and pastors preaching not acceptance but principled rejection.   Prelates could be declaring from pulpits everywhere that the triumph of gay rights is a defeat for God’s Country, and the new laws are immoral and need neither be respected nor obeyed. 

  Too late. If priests and pastors had marched for and preached and declared from the pulpits everywhere that the imposition of legalized murder is a defeat for God’s Country and, therefore, the new laws are immoral and need neither be respected nor obeyed, then God’s Country might have emerged victorious. Not now though.

  But it’s easy to blame priests and pastors.  If just Catholics had broken those laws, we would have protected tens of millions of lives.  Who do you think will end up in Hell?
  ________________________________________
  -------------------------------------------------------------------

 

  A Times letter writer says this about the Boston bombing:
 
  Alas, there are those highly harmful few who can find purpose and meaning only through acts of destruction. No reasoning will penetrate those minds. 

  I responded:  “Few” above should be changed to “many”: on the same day three older people were murdered in Boston three hundred young people were too. 

 Then Neal:  Wait, John!  How can you possibly equate the lives of three born people killed illegally with the lives of 300 unborn people killed legally in Boston? When you impose that kind of reasoning and logic on reality, you utterly contradict the words of the Supreme Court of the people of the United States of America.

  Don’t you understand that the vast majority of people on this list, like the vast majority of people in the USA, let the Supreme Court do their thinking for them, and treat the logic and reasoning of the Supreme Court as if it was the Word of God.  The forefathers of the majority on this list have already proven to have a will to kill Jesus of Nazareth for doing the same thing you are doing. How can you expect these current people to leave you alive for long if you don’t stop contradicting the Laws decreed by their Supreme Mind? 
  ___________________________________
  ----------------------------------------------------------- 

  Did you read the last entry in the last newsletter, May 2, by John Brockhoeft?  Neal has issues with it:  

  Brockhoeft said, "... if there were an organized viable force of men willing to fight for our country and defend our land against the New World Order and against our domestic enemies, I would join that force of men right away..."
  What he is saying to me is clear. He is saying that the New Army of God I advocate forming is not "an organized viable force of men willing to fight for our country..." 

  Any comment I might make would remind you of what took place in the rabbi’s marriage counseling session:
 
Wife --  “He’s a terrible husband,” and she lists ten grievances.

Rabbi --  After each grievance, the rabbi says, “You’re right, you’re right, justified, justified.”  Then it’s the husband’s turn. 

Husband --  “She’s a terrible wife,” and he also lists ten grievances. 

Rabbi --:  After each grievance, the rabbi again says, “You’re right, you’re right, justified, justified.”    But this time the wife is listening; she bursts back into the office. 

Wife --  “Rabbi, both of us can’t be right! That’s terrible counseling!  You should be ashamed of yourself!” 

Rabbi --  “You’re right, you’re right, justified, justified.”
  _______________________________________-
  -----------------------------------------------------------------

 Dear John, The true story of Roe v. Wade is that Texas came to the U.S. Supreme Court as a straw man, with a glum look on its face, hoping the Court would tie its hands by making all states permit abortion, since Texans are too proud too legalize child homicide on their own. So the Court gave in by making all states permit abortion.
  But there was a problem. Although the Court was willing to assist states like Texas by requiring voluntary abortion, at the same time it did not want to hinder the abortion effort by placing too strict a limitation on forced abortions. So rather than literally founding Roe on a woman's right to choose, instead Roe was carefully crafted on the foundation of the involuntary abatement authority of Jacobson v. Massachusetts (forced vaccination) and Buck v. Bell (forced sterilization), going so far as to reaffirm the initial decision in Buck v. Bell by abandoning Skinner v. Oklahoma, so women can be forced to abort even due to poverty and for crimes such as drug use.
  As the Court puts it at the very heart of Roe: "the abortion decision" (whether to refuse or choose an abortion) cannot be left to "the woman's sole determination" in view of "important state interests" with emphasis on letting states override the decision to refuse an abortion based on the authority of "Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U.S. 11 (1905) (vaccination)" and "Buck v. Bell, 274 U.S. 200 (1927) (sterilization)." See Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973), pp. 153-154.
  As Justice Marshall explains two months after: The Court has never recognized any "right" to procreate, by which in this context he means the Court has refused to recognize a woman's constitutional right to carry her pregnancy to term, as evidenced by the fact that "the Court reaffirmed its initial decision in Buck v. Bell" when handing down Roe in the first place. See San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 1 (1973), pp. 100-101.
  By initial decision in Buck v. Bell, Justice Marshall means that when it came to abortion the Court in Roe ultimately abandoned Skinner v. Oklahoma. Skinner had modified Buck by prohibiting forced sterilization in arbitrary connection with poverty and crime. But in Roe the Court retraced its steps by disavowing Skinner's applicability to abortion, saying, "The situation therefore is inherently different from...Skinner." See Roe, p. 159. It was in this way that Roe both reserved and expanded forced abortion.
  And so the true story of Roe is about pregnancy abatement, with voluntary abortion as the path of least resistance, and with involuntary abortion as the backup plan.       Sincerely, Cal
  _____________________________________-
  ---------------------------------------------------------------

   As I arrived at Joel Lebed’s house recently for my monthly prayer vigil, I heard a dog bark.  Then a neighbor appeared: 

  Him,  Can’t you guys coordinate your visits?  Your buddy was here last Sunday.

  Me,  I know.

  Him,  The dog just woke up my daughter from  her nap.

  Me,  I can hear her crying.

  Him, You’re not accomplishing anything.  You’re really annoying us. We’re all on his side.

  Me, Then annoying you is one of our goals.

  Him,  Can you at least do it together on one Sunday?

  Me, No -- one of the reasons we separated was to apply more pressure.  Now we’re getting two more prolifers to cover the whole month.

  Him, Oh God! 

  I should have said “trying to get” rather than “getting,” but this is another indication that prolife presence in a killer’s neighborhood can be effective.  If any of  you know of someone in the Philadelphia area who would help Gerry and me with our prayer vigils, please tell him or her to call.
  _________________________________
  ------------------------------------------------------

   I’d always been kinda anti-Abby Johnson until Rick Ellis emailed me this: 

  What Abby Johnson posted on her page....

  This Gosnell trial has really been a sobering experience for me. It is kind of hard to put into words. I look at the testimonies of these workers and I can't help but realize that they are no different from me. They watched babies die and did nothing to intervene...I watched a baby die and did nothing. I often wonder what it will be like when I die and meet Jesus. Yes, I have repented, but I spent 8 years helping to kill defenseless children. What will that feel like when He recounts the deaths of all of those little ones that I took part in. I want to feel anger at Gosnell and those who worked for him, but I can't. I just so desperately want them to repent. I know there are people out there who are angry because of my past life...I know it is hard for many to forgive me. I now have a better understanding of how that can be.
 

  Now I am solidly pro-Abby. This is  what caused me to  change: “ I look at the testimonies of these workers and I can't help but realize that they are no different from me. They watched babies die and did nothing to intervene...I watched a baby die and did nothing. I often wonder what it will be like when I die and meet Jesus.” 

  I’m pro-Abby because I’m pro-me -- even though I stand near babies under attack without helping them, and even though my taxes pay for their torturous deaths.  I too “wonder what it will be like when I die and meet Jesus.”  

  Two responders Rick included in his email are like the old me:

  1.  We should copy and past this to every Gosnell post we can find on face book. Johnson is running scared, and needs to be backed all the way up into a corner where she has to answer questions she has so far refused to answer.

  2.  ...and Abby Johnson deserves the same penalty as Gosnell.  
  Some one needs to ask Johnson if Gosnell "repents" should he get the same free walk that she demands for herself, and face no further prosecution????
  MIZZ Johnson needs to understand, that this is not about "forgiveness". that is between her and God.
  But if she is truly repentant as she now claims, then she will either fess up that her "testimony" is a fraud, or turn states evidence to see that the victims of her confessed crimes [under age girls, sex slaves, and tax payers] are liberated, and get justice.
  But Johnson has never been about justice for person's in the womb.
  She is about taking advantage of an opportunity to make a living based on what seems to be a fraudulent testimony.
 

  I’d sure like to hear these folks, and anyone else, respond to my response.
  ________________________________-
  ---------------------------------------------------------- 

  Dave Leach also believes “we should examine every legitimate means, including force, in our attempt to protect those being tortured to death.”    Prolifers attack us for this belief even more vehemently than killers’ helpers do: 

  A Des Moines anti-abortion activist has publicly proclaimed that “it will be a blessing to the babies” if  someone shoots the people who recently reopened a Kansas abortion clinic.

  Dave Leach’s comments are being denounced by the leader of Iowa’s largest anti-abortion group, who says such talk is immoral and hurts the cause.

  Leach posted the comments this month on YouTube. His posting includes a recorded phone conversation he had with another man, whom Leach identifies as abortion opponent Scott Roeder. Roeder is serving a life prison sentence for the 2009 shooting death of the Wichita clinic’s then-owner, Dr. George Tiller.

  Leach has previously suggested that other men were justified in killing other abortion providers. He notes in the video that Tiller’s old clinic was recently reopened by a new abortion agency.

  “If someone would shoot the new abortionists, like Scott shot George Tiller, … hardly anyone will appreciate it but the babies,” he says. “It will be a blessing to the babies. Everyone else will panic. Of all places to open up a killing office, to reopen the one office in the United States more notorious for decades than any other is an act of defiance against God and the last remaining reverence for human life.”

  Leach runs a small music store on Des Moines’ south side and has gained attention for years with his strident opposition to abortion.

  In an interview with The Des Moines Register, Leach said he would not personally harm any abortion providers.

  “I’m 67 years old. I don’t know anything about guns,” he said. “I think I could accomplish more with words.” He denied that his comments were meant to encourage anyone to kill abortion providers. “That’s not exactly a call for that to happen,” he said. “Any reasonable person looking at that statement would not equate that with a call for action.” 

  But the leader of Iowa’s largest anti-abortion group disagreed. Jenifer Bowen, executive director of Iowa Right to Life, watched the video and was upset by Leach’s words.

  “Comments like this don’t feel any different from a jihadist calling for the death of another person he doesn’t agree with,” she said.

  Bowen said Leach has never been connected to her group. Stances like his can turn people away from the anti-abortion cause, she said. She added that her group relies on calm, reasonable discussions to change the minds of abortion supporters.

  Bowen said she condemned Tiller’s Wichita abortion practice, but she was dismayed by the doctor’s slaying.
She said Tiller’s abortion clinic would soon have been put out of business by legal challenges, but Roeder decided to kill him instead.

  “We never would work toward taking his life. He was a person,” she said of Tiller.

  In the YouTube video, the man Leach identifies as Roeder laughs as Leach talks about the prospect of someone shooting the new leaders of the Wichita clinic. Then the second man wonders aloud about the clinic director’s motives. “To walk in there and reopen a clinic, a murder mill where a man was stopped, it’s almost like putting a target on your back — saying, ‘Well, let’s see if you can shoot me,’ ” he says.

  Then the man quotes a fellow activist, who predicted that the abortion industry would end if 100 abortionists were shot. “I think eight have been shot, so we’ve got 92 to go,” the man whom Leach identified as Roeder says. “Maybe (the Wichita clinic director) will be number nine. I don’t really know. I’m not sure about that. But she’s kind of painting a target on her.”

  Officials of the clinic, the South Wind Women’s Center, did not respond to requests for comment. Tarek Rizk, a spokesman for the national abortion rights group NARAL Pro-Choice America, said the video was troubling.

  “It’s obviously very disturbing to hear these men discussing what sounds to be a criminal act in such brazen terms,” he said.  “We feel the clinic in Wichita is providing a vital service to women, giving them the tools and opportunities they need to control their own lives, and obviously we don’t think that is something they should have their lives threatened for providing.” 

  University of Iowa law professor Todd Pettys said the question of whether the men’s comments were constitutionally protected speech is a gray area. The men didn’t threaten to personally hurt anyone, he said.  Theoretically, their comments could be taken as incitement to a crime, he said, but incitement usually involves encouraging someone to immediately break the law.

  “I think they do dance up to the line, but whether they cross the line — I think reasonable judges could disagree,” he said. 

  In an interview with the Register, Leach was asked whether he would be sad if someone killed the people running the Kansas clinic.

  “It would be tragic to have someone have to die over that,” he replied, “but it’s also tragic that they would open a clinic and kill more babies.”

  Leach said he would prefer that anti-abortion activists work through the courts to have abortion banned. He said he’s been offering Roeder legal advice on how to appeal his murder conviction in a way that they hope could lead to the overturning of the Roe v. Wade ruling, which legalized abortion.

  Local Planned Parenthood officials declined to comment about Leach.  

  I want so much to agree with Jenifer Bowen -- that  stances like Leach’s can turn people away from the anti-abortion cause and we should instead rely on calm, reasonable discussions to change the minds of abortion supporters.  My domestic situation would improve and I would have time for my other obsessions, fishing and hunting.

  But when you follow the history of child murder, you realize that argument is absurd.  Satan has planted an Auschwitz in or near all of our neighborhoods.  After forty years of calm, reasonable discussion, those
murder mills are still operating at break-neck speed.

  Even more absurd: “She said Tiller’s abortion clinic would soon have been put out of business by legal challenges.”  If Bowen is aware of the Wichita situation, she could not have said that with a straight face.  Oh yes, legal  challenges certainly did lead to the closing of Tiller’s mill, but that was only because they had failed, and failed again, and would certainly have continued to fail. 

  Even prolifers who believe in calm, reasonable discussion still call abortion murder, and that will eventually move a courageous individual to act as if it is murder. Prolifers have refused to face this fact.  But killers’ helpers know it. That’s why they want to stop all of us from calling murder murder.

  When the killers’ helpers extend legalized murder to include one and two year olds and anybody over 75, will prolifers still call for calm and reasonable discussion?   

  That response does seem absurd now, doesn’t it.

  But that is what the killers’ helpers will call for then, and it’s what all official national and state prolife policy makers like Jenifer Bowen and 99.99% of us other prolifers will agree to then.

  I’d always thought Sodom and Gomorrah was an exaggeration.  What!  Five or so people saved out of a nation?  No more.
  _________________________________-
  ------------------------------------------------------- 

  When my family and I started our company 40 years ago, we were working out of a garage on a $600 bank loan, assembling miniature picture  frames. Our first retail store wasn't much bigger than most people's  living rooms, but we had faith that we would succeed if we lived and  worked according to God's word.

   From there, Hobby Lobby has become one of the nation's largest arts and crafts retailers, with more than 500  locations in 41 states. Our children grew up into fine business leaders, and today we run Hobby Lobby together, as a family.

    We're Christians, and we run our business on Christian principles. I've always said that the first two goals of our business are (1) to run our business in harmony with God's laws, and (2) to focus on  people more than money. And that's what we've tried to do. We close early so our employees can see their families at night. We keep our stores closed on Sundays, one of the week's biggest shopping days, so that our workers and their families can enjoy a day of rest.

  We believe that it is by God's grace that Hobby Lobby has endured, and he  has blessed us and our employees. We've not only added jobs in a weak economy, we've raised wages for the past four years in a row. Our full-time employees start at 80% above minimum wage.

   But now, our government threatens to change all of that. A new government healthcare mandate says that our family business MUST provide what I believe are abortion-causing drugs as part of our health insurance. Being Christians, we don't pay for drugs that might cause abortions, which means that we don't cover emergency contraception, the morning-after pill or the week-after pill. We believe doing so might end a life after the moment of conception,  something that is contrary to our most important beliefs. It goes against the Biblical principles on which we have run this company  since day one

  If we refuse to comply, we could face $1.3 million PER DAY in government fines. Our government threatens to fine job creators in a bad economy. Our government threatens to fine a company that's raised wages four years running. Our government threatens to fine a family for running its business according to its beliefs. It's not right.

  I  know people will say we ought to follow the rules; that it's the same for everybody.  But that's not true. The government has exempted thousands of  companies from this mandate, for reasons of convenience or cost. But it won't exempt them for reasons of religious belief.

  So, Hobby Lobby and my family are forced to make a choice. With great reluctance, we filed a lawsuit today, represented by the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, asking a federal court to stop this mandate before it hurts our business. We don't like to go running into court, but we no longer have a choice. We believe people are more important than the bottom line and that honoring God is more important than  turning a profit.

  My family has lived the American dream. We want to continue growing our company and providing great jobs for thousands of employees, but the government is going to make that much more difficult. The government is forcing us to choose between following our faith and following the law. I say that's a choice no American and no American business should have to make.

  The government cannot force you to follow laws that go against your fundamental religious belief. They have exempted thousands of  companies but will not exempt Christian organizations including the Catholic church.

  Since you will not see this in the liberal media, please pass this on  to all your contacts.

      Sincerely,

 David Green, CEO and Founder of Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. 

  Cathy Ramey sent this, along with her usual powerful comments:

  Please see the letter . . . from Hobby Lobby CEO; where are all those other enterprises, churches, seminaries, Christian schools, Christian-owned businesses...
  This is not a time for cowardice. If the "Church" at large were holding to righteousness, the Light would be so bright the media and the government could not mow over the few like Hobby Lobby. . . .

  Darkness as great as that which has fallen upon this nation gives us an unparalleled opportunity to make God's glory distinct against the "justice" of this present evil age.
  _______________________________-
  ----------------------------------------------------

   To send money to the federal Prisoners, those with eight digits after their names, make out a postal money order to the Prisoner’s name and number. Then send it to Des Moines, Iowa 50947-0001. 
  Ask the non-feds how they may receive money – check, money order, etc. It varies by state.
  _____________________________
  ------------------------------------------------- 

  Receipt of this excellent missive notwithstanding, if you wish to be excluded from such blessings in the future, simply advise me.