Abortion is Murder, 9-3, July, 2011

Formerly Stop the Killing of Young People (skyp) and soon, perhaps, Stop Killing Preemies

July, 2011 Vol. 9 No. 3
PO Box 7424, Reading, PA 19603
Phone – 484-706-4375
Email – johndunk@ptd.net
Web – skyp1.blogspot.com
Circulation – 114
John Dunkle, Editor

Abortion is Murder, a weak, pathetic response to baby murder, is sent out at least once a month. If the gestapo hasn’t jailed you for defending the innocent realistically, you either have to tell me you want it or go to the website. Faxes and emails are free but snail-mail is free only for PFCs, $100 for others.
Because I believe we should examine every legitimate means, including force, in our attempt to protect those being tortured to death, I want to hear from people who’ve been forceful. I’d also like to hear from those prolifers and pro-deathers who call force violence.

Prisoners for Christ:

1. Evans, Paul Ross 83230-180, USP McCreary, P.O. Box 3000, Pine Knot, KY 42635
2. Gibbons, Linda, Vanier WDC, 655 Martin St., P.O. Box 1040, Milton, ON, Canada L9T 5E6
3. Griffin, Michael 310249, 5914 Jeff Ates Rd., Milton, FL 32583-0000
4. Jordi, Stephen 70309-004, FCI P.O. Box 33, Terre Haute IN 47802 6/30
5. Knight, Peter James, P.O. Box 376, Laverton, Victoria, Australia
6. Kopp, James 11761-055, USP Canaan, P.O. Box 300, 3057 Easton Tpk., Waymart, PA 18472
7. Little, David SJRCC, 930 Old Black River Road, Saint John, NB E2J 4T3
8. Moose, Justin – FCI Talladega, P.O. Box 1000, Talladega, AL 35160
9. Richardson, Alonzo Lee 12898-021, FCI Pollock Federal Correctional Institution, P.O. Box 4050, Pollock, LA 71467
10. Roeder, Scott P. 65192, PO Box 2, Lansing Kansas 66043
11. Ross, Michael, Custer County Jail, 1010 Main St., Miles City, Montana 59301
12. Rudolph, Eric 18282-058 US Pen. Max, Box 8500, Florence CO 81226-8500
13. Shannon, Rachelle 59755-065, FCI Waseca, Unit A, P.O. Box 1731, Waseca, MN 56093 3/31
14. Waagner, Clayton Lee 17258-039, United States Penitentiary, P.O. Box 1000, Lewisburg PA 17837 8/25

Even though it’s a shameful sin to abandon defenseless victims to their attackers, it’s a far worse sin when you attempt to pass the blame for that sin onto God by claiming that’s what he wanted you to do. And that’s precisely what so many people have done with their rejection of God’s clear and sensible instructions to defend the defenseless, and with their pretenses and fake excuses for rejecting those instructions. Pride is a terrible thing when it leads you to deny your own sin and instead say that God sinned. Peter James Knight
--------------------------------------------

Dear John, How appropriate to write you on Mother’s Day. Yesterday I got to see my ex-wife, my two wonderful children, my two grandchildren, and my son-in-law. Today I will see my mother. I am truly blessed.
I wrote the enclosed just pouring out my heart not knowing what I was going to do with it, so when I got your latest newsletter, I figured I would send it on to you to discriminate how you wish.
I do believe that God’s will is being done in my life regardless of my surroundings and circumstances.
One of my prayers has been to get out the message of life and of salvation through Christ alone as far and wide as possible, and God has answered in pretty dramatic ways. I did a written interview with a Canadian newspaper. Then RTL (largest private broadcaster in Germany) came and interviewed me. Last February 60 Minutes (Australia) came and interviewed me and it was aired the first week of August (nine msn.com All)
You will find the interview quite an eye opener as far as how the abortionists think and the lies that Satan has them believing, such as 1) a baby is a parasite, 2) it only depends on how a woman feels as to whether or not to kill a baby, 3) abortion is like jumping off the Empire State Building, 4) God is a woman.
Like I said, an eye opener.
May you always find yourself in God’s will.
In Christ, Michael Griffin

The “enclosed” is “The Death of Truth: Satan’s Agenda.” I will start it below and finish it after two or three more installments.
----------------------------------------------------------------

Paganizing the USAFA.

Polytheistic Democracy is what our American experiment has turned into. A Christian Republic we came close to being. We had all the trappings and even permitted states to be Christian republics. The union of these (united) States was never intended to be the Leviathan it has become. Hobbes has surely rolled over several times. The "contract" has been violated since the southern states opted to lawfully secede and the northern states refused them that choice. For right or for wrong, liberty to part the company of covenant breaking North was denied.
Our political salvation is in a successful secessionist movement. Defiance by states of the federal behemoth. But that spirit must be kindled among the smallest communities and civil arenas.
What does your church teach about the duty of civil authorities? What is the church's duty regarding the discipling of such authorities and lobbying them for Truth and Justice (by the standards of the Word)? Why are we not Theocrats, first? If we are advocates of the Kingdom of God, what guidance does this fact give us in our citizenship? How can we be advocates of secularist (pagan) democracies or republics? Has it not become plain that such is a foolish - not to mention un-Biblical - posture?
Justice, then Peace, Michael Bray

I’ve already stolen the Holman’s words to open these newsletters. Now I’ll steal Rev. Bray’s to close them: Receipt of this excellent missive notwithstanding, if you wish to be excluded from such blessings in the future, simply advise us.
Following is a reply/elaboration upon my recent comments on the efficacy of secessionist efforts. David Rydholm poignantly puts it as follows:

Hello, Michael, You wrote, "Our political salvation is in a successful secessionist movement."

It is worth noting that many who call themselves Christian presently continue to view Abraham Lincoln as a great hero. But the main, defining, driving principle of what Mr. Lincoln believed, stood for, and worked to bring about consisted simply in coercion back into the "union" against states which would otherwise have successfully remained seceded. We all rejoice, naturally, that the unthinkable evil of slavery was ended -- something, by the way, that Lincoln originally had no plans to attempt. But what gets lost in the rejoicing is that a terrible precedent was set, that of the use of force to the coercion of seceding states back into the union -- that a great evil was "remedied" through the use of another great evil.
Every schoolchild needs to be taught, and taught emphatically, that Lincoln was prepared, for most of the early duration the war, right up to the Emancipation Proclamation, to allow slave states to maintain their "peculiar institution" if they would lay down their arms and return to the so-called "Union". Another fact that schoolchildren are not taught, but which needs to be emphasized, is that the Emancipation Proclamation did not proclaim all the slaves free -- it allowed slavery to continue unhindered in Maryland, Delaware, Kentucky, and Missouri, since those slave states never actually voted to secede.
As near as I have been able to determine, Lincoln does appear to have deplored the institution of slavery. But what mattered to him far, far more was to prevent the dissolution of the Union, and after the secessions took place, to reverse that dissolution. It is in that light that history ought to regard him, as the leader who was the driving force for the annexation of unwilling separated states, an act that, in and of itself, no one ought be seen to possess moral authority to do. Sincerely, David
-----------------------------------------------------------------

The Death of Truth: Satan’s Agenda
By Michael Griffin

1. If it took a civil war to stop slavery and restore inalienable rights, why is it that people argue we should only use peaceful means to stop abortion.

2. How could you further wrest the truth by planning the utter destruction of a child one second and seeking the death penalty for someone who completed the act in the next second.

3. If a mass murderer came across a man throwing his children off a bridge, are his moral obligations any different from a police officer’s at an abortion clinic?

4. If a black presidential candidate calls a child “punishment” and promises to fund an organization whose goal is to commit genocide on the b lack race, then why would someone from that same race vote for him?

The fact that we could even ask these questions in this day and age shows that Satan’s Agenda is nearly complete” Steal, Kill, and Destroy Truth.
Steal – Satan has stolen our culture of life by subtly and stealthily separating us from the gospel truth to the point those in authority do his bidding.
Kill – Satan has so deceived us that men take an oath in medical school one day to do no harm and the next day rip a child to pierces and call it healthcare and ask the country to pay for it.
Destroy – Satan has destroyed the very foundations of every conveyance of the truth in the Gospel of Jesus Christ and perverted it beyond recognition.

In John 18:38 Pilate looked truth in the face and said “What is truth?” We ask the same question today, not because we don’t know the answer but because our conscience is searing. Having all the information we have at our disposal, we condemn ourselves as we cower under the question, What is truth.
The moment Guttenberg’s press printed the first Bible, Satan set an agenda to destroy the one thing he did not possess, The Truth. John 8:44: “He was a murderer from the beginning and abode not in truth because there is not truth in him.”
Because God’s word is settled: Psalm 119:89, “Forever, O Lord, thy word is settled in heaven,” Satan is in a losing race against time. His time to oppose this Gospel and its author is winding down. We must, we must, we must: look at our lies in light of the truth of God’s word and flee from error and back to the truth. When Guttenberg’s press came down, Satan came up with a plan to use that same technology to further his agenda. By degrees Satan’s plan has almost come full circle. First he started with partial truths, other gospels, and, as the centuries went on, it progressed to the point that he would have men change God’s word itself and them print his (Satan’s) own bible. In parallel with the attack on God’s word, he led men to print that that would oppose Paul’s admonition to “let us lay aside every weight, and the sin which does so easily beset us (Heb. 12) The printing presses turned out anything that would steal any portion of that 24 hour day God gave us. Whether it was a steamy romance to set men’s minds on something other than God’s word, to fiction where God is a fable and onto pornography to destroy men’s minds. (tbc) --------------------------------------------------------------

My great and good friend from Hawaii, Cal, sends this quiz. My answers will appear in the next issue.

Dear John, I've made a Catholic Pro-Life Quiz. To test your knowledge of the Church's position on life before birth, mark your answers carefully and let's see how well you did and how well your readers score.

1. Regarding an abortion brought about by human intervention, the Church condemns:
(a) Any kind of abortion
(b) Any kind of abortion, except to save the mother's life
(c) Any kind of abortion, unless the procedure is not specifically aimed at killing
(d) The Church remains undecided on this subject

2. Which of the following best sums up the Church's opposition to abortion?
(a) Faced with doubt about person status, it is morally wrong to accept the risk of committing homicide.
(b) Faced with no doubt about person status, it is morally wrong to commit homicide.

3. Which of the following best sums up the Church's position on the person status of the human embryo?
(a) The human embryo is really already a person.
(b) The answer to this question must remain open to further considerations.

4. Which of the following best sums up the Church's teachings on the person?
(a) The Church has expressly affirmed the person at conception.
(b) The Church has expressly denied the person at conception.
(c) The Church has not expressly committed itself to a statement of a definite kind.

5. Which of the following best sums up the sort of legislative model the Church wants in opposition to abortion?
(a) Children have the same legal rights during gestation as after birth, and so the law should expressly affirm the person at conception in a statement of a definite kind.
(b) Without going so far as to expressly affirm the person at conception in a statement of a definite kind, the law should still prohibit any intervention specifically aimed at killing.

6. When the Church says "the human being is to be respected and treated AS a person from the moment of conception":
(a) The word "as" is used figuratively, such that this assertion does not deal with the theme of personal identity of the human embryo; instead, it only goes so far as to say that when faced with doubt the issue of person status should be treated "as if" it were so.
(b) The word "as" is used literally, such that this statement definitely affirms the personal identity of the human embryo in the literal sense and without equivocation.

7. When the Church says a human being begins human life as a human individual at the moment of conception:
(a) Without specifically using the word "person," the Church has nonetheless affirmed the person at conception.
(b) Though continuing to ponder the question of how could a human individual not be a human person, the teaching authority of the Church has not expressly committed itself to a statement of a definite kind on this specific issue, but nonetheless constantly reaffirms the moral condemnation of any intervention specifically aimed at killing.

8. The Church:
(a) Has expressly left aside the question of when a person begins life.
(b) Has expressly affirmed that a person begins life at the moment of conception.

9. Which of the following best sums up the Church's position on protecting children from abortion?
(a) Since there is doubt that the child is a person, you should not run the risk of killing a child yourself, but at the same time you should not use any sort of violence to stop someone else from doing it either, because you yourself might be wrong, unless you are a law enforcement officer specifically authorized to do so.
(b) Since there is no doubt that the child is a person, you should use whatever means is necessary to stop someone from harming a child at the moment of conception, the same as you would for any other child.

10. Which of the following best sums up the Church's position on ministering to children who are victims of in vitro fertilization?
(a) A child in a test tube has the same right to be blessed and baptized as a child in a crib.
(b) A child conceived in a test tube should not be blessed or baptized, unless the child has already been transferred to the mother's uterus.


Note: If you believe the answer key is incorrect, I will be glad to give you the citations. Answers: 1(c), 2(a), 3(b), 4(c), 5(b), 6(a), 7(b), 8(a), 9(a), 10(b)
So what is your score? Sincerely, Cal.
----------------------------------------------------------------

Here’s a response to June’s newsletter:

"Violence" in the context of human acts is force unlawfully applied. Police use violence against baby savers. Most baby savers use lawful force, if any. M. Griffin & P. Hill acted lawfully under existing Florida statutes. Corrupt judge Bell unlawfully denied Hill a fair, that is to say, a, trial.
He was honest enough to declare in open court his reason. Al
---------------------------------------------------------

Here’s the latest from the magnificent Holmans:

We are all either a part of the baby-killing solution or a part of the baby-killing problem.
It takes a village to kill a child. It takes ambitious politicians, corrupt judges, and mind-less prosecutors and police; it takes indifferent pastors and churchmen; it takes selfish moms and dads, and merchants of death: doctors, medical organizations, and drug companies.
Collectively, they make up the bottom rung of the ladder of humanity.
Somewhere at the bottom of this food chain are those, who at the end of each baby-killing day, pack up the battered remains into cardboard boxes, and burn them in incinerators. Stericycle is a sanitized name for what the Nazi’s called “Copos,” and for what the concentration camp prisoners called “Gas-Oven-Jews.” For an extra crust of bread they would carry off their murdered brethren to the ovens for cremation.
But their ashes fall upon us all; their blood screams from the ground for vengeance. God does not turn a blind eye, a deaf ear, and a cold shoulder toward them as most Americans have. Blood must be answered with blood.
Our blood, and blood of our children will answer for America’s holocaust.
----------------------------------------------------------------

PFCs, I wish you could see Rev. Don Spitz’s latest video. You’re all there:

If I left you out of the video, I’m sorry, but Praise the Lord Jesus Christ there are more of us who believe unborn children deserve the same protection as born children then there ever were before and numbers keep on growing.

We will be joining those who have gone before us: Paul Hill, Paul deParrie, Robert Bob Ferguson, John Salvi III and a few others; so while we have breath and a few days left, let us serve our LORD Jesus Christ our King and Lord to the fullest of our ability.
---------------------------------------------------------------

Hello John, As far as Jim’s “idea” goes, I don’t think I’d agree with the words Eric used and I don’t think I’d agree with Jim’s attempted correction. It requires a bit of thought to state the situations correctly. I’ve not given it that thought as yet and I can’t help feeling that either Eric or Jim has either. It’s one of those affairs where you know what the situation is but it takes a bit of time and thought to put it into the right words.

Perhaps I can say this much at this stage though. Since Eric did use the word “you,” he is obviously addressing his comment to those who are at least old enough to read, and is thus not referring to the victims of abortion when he says, “You have no absolute right to life.

I’m still not 100% happy with it, not even 90% happy with it, but perhaps[s that’s the addition Jim should have suggested fort thickhead pro-abortionists who just can’t get anything right and who are barely able to read even at 30 or 40 years of age after many years of schooling.

Aranda
(And if you don’t know what that Baagandji word on the previous line means, then in the Nyawaygi language it means Nhanta. I hope that helps you out.) Peter Knight
-----------------------------------------------------------

Rev. Michael Bray saved this message Dan Holman wrote two years ago, thank God:

Does life imitate art? Does art imitate death? Both are true. An HBO documentary about Jack Kevorkian is being filmed in Oakland County this week. Al Pacino is starring as Michigan’s own Dr. Death.
The familiar furniture inside the Oakland County Courthouse will be part of the set. I am an anti-abortion prisoner of Oakland County these past 4 months; the same jail system which housed Dr. Death.
Jack Kevorkian murdered an estimated 130 people. With impunity, he bragged about it to the press. In 1999, Kevorkian was finally tried and convicted of one count of murder; he was sentenced to 10-25 years in the Jackson State Prison.
While in jail I met several Oakland County inmates who did time with Dr. Death. One of them carted him around the prison in his wheelchair. His prison job was performing sign language for deaf inmates. Kevorkian’s prison name tag fetched several thousand dollars on E-Bay!
Dr. Death was paroled in 2006 because he is dying of cancer. He obviously has not taken the cure he so highly recommends to others. ("Physician, heal thyself" Luke 4:23)

Those who achieve infamy have greater recognition and honor than those who do well! Michigan native James Poullion often stood alone in public places speaking up for the weak and the helpless. It is dangerous ministry, particularly when it is done alone. It is hard to find people to do this kind of ministry with! Jesus sent his disciples two by two because someone needs to watch your back. Those who hate God love death. There are a lot of God haters in America! On September 11, 2009, while speaking up for the weak and the helpless, Jim Poullion was gunned down in front of Owosso, Michigan High School.
Kevorkian did not seem to worry much about watching his back. After every killing day, Like Goliath of old, he publicly challenged the judicial system of any state to charge him with a crime. But it seemed that there was no David who wanted to take him on!
Why is this you might ask? Why do Americans love and admire Dr. Jack Kevorkian and Dr. George Tiller, but hate the likes of Jim Poullion?
It is because we Americans are inherently evil; we are a wicked nation of God-haters. We have expelled God from our schools; we mock HIM in our media, and we rebel against HIS holy law. HE commands “Thou shall not murder” and we cheerfully and systematically murder 4000 innocent Americans per day. It is done with our tax money, and with our tacit or expressed permission. The American People, called by God’s name, turn a blind eye, a deaf ear, and a cold shoulder towards their plight.
Jim Poullion is not nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize; we have no illusions of a movie being made of his life. But we do expect Jim to be honored before our Lord and our King.
On that Great Day of Judgment, before all of His creation, Jim Poullion should hear "Well done thou good and faithful servant!" Matthew 25:21-23
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Don’t despair! Stacey & Hutch are still around. Here’s the second part of “Scary Stories with Happy Endings”: Our story to date: S & H continue to reminisce about some narrow escapes where angels rescued them. Reminiscing comes along with reflections about optimization, on the long hauls to and from the edges of the “donut” (said the other Dauphin . . .), a self imposed discipline which helps them sleep at night when they are “out of the field.”

The Back Alley – the Real Back Alley

“When I think back on that one, I get goose bumps,” said Stacey.
“We almost got popped,” rejoined Hutch, uneasily.”
“No, it’s not that,” Stacey came back. “Jail I can deal with. I was arrested once at a CWA convention in Chicago.”
“Do tell.”
“Some other time,” said Stacey, “but it was not a problem, almost a party, a bunch of us sitting on the floor of a gym eating baloney sandwiches and apples.”
“Ugh”
“But it was no big deal. The thing about the back alley thing was the creepiness of it. That’s what gives me goose bumps.”
And, in the telling, the story came out.
It had been a long night, and actually, S & H had quite a while previously figured out a way to do more than one switch in a night.
Usually that meant several exurb switches comparatively close together, or, substations that were all within what would be considered one city, geographically speaking, and if telephonically speaking, there were several separate exchanges all in one city.
With experience S & H had figured out a routine of checking out a switch by day, to look for things like surveillance cameras, over the street (and not all of those were Telco security cameras in this era of urban police cameras in downtown areas).
They also looked for cop shops too close, all night diners, bus stations, bars, etc.

As they knew from their learning about Red Zones, not all of these were enemies all the time. It depended on micro-geography, line-of-sight, etc.
A few tipsy civilians wandering around could actually be a good thing, depending.
During these “dry runs,” S & H would become a least a little familiar with the towns they were visiting, which were by definition strange towns.
They knew that if they ever got too familiar with a town, that someone in that town could also be getting too familiar with seeing them, and maybe even making the connection between seeing them in the shadows, and the appearance of new art work in dawn’s light.
Nothing draws the attention of everyone, including police, to a stranger in town quicker than the stranger hesitating at a stop sign, stop light, turn lane, a sudden move across lanes, etc.
However, nothing blinds eyes to the sight of an out-of-state plate quicker than someone who seems to know what she’s doing. Locals just assume she’s looking for a travelling salesman or ex-spouse, of which there so many in our “mobile” culture.
By the time night rolled around, S & H had a pretty good idea of where they were going to go that night, and the sequence, which, like everything, was flexible and subject to change on a moment’s notice or an exigent change of circumstance.
Each night, each series of switches had a little feel of its own. Too much routine could lead to complacency. A great way to break up the night’s work and relax a little, and wake up and stay sharp, was the “lunch” break, a run to an all-night diner. (tbc)

I will continue this episode of S & H in August. ---------------------------------------------------------------

Receipt of this excellent missive notwithstanding, if you wish to be excluded from such blessings in the future, simply advise us.